Talk:Neifi Pérez/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Neifi Pérez/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Neifi Pérez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 19:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

I'll do this review.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

;WP:LEAD

;Colorado Rockies

  • "The Rockies had offered him a 4-year, $17 million contract in favor of a 1-year $3.55 million deal." is unclear.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • : I left out a clause when I wrote that; updated. Mackensen (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • "In the end the Rockies dealt Pérez to the Kansas City Royals as part of a three-way deal in which the Royals sent Jermaine Dye to the Oakland Athletics who then sent Mario Encarnacion, José Ortiz and Todd Belitz." This is a three way trade that sounds like a two way trade. Please clarify.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • : Clarified that the Oakland players went to Colorado. Mackensen (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

;Chicago Cubs

  • "worth between $1 million and $2.5 million." - We should be able to be more clear than this.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • : Found a source explaining it: $1 million base and up to $1.5 million in bonuses. Mackensen (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

;Detroit Tigers

;Foreign

;See also

  • This section shows he is on two lists that are not explained in the text above. These seem to by accomplishments that should be in the text.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

:* I've added references and text for both. Mackensen (talk) 13:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

:* Done. Mackensen (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

;References

  • No one uses {{Reflist|2}} anymore it should be {{Reflist|33em}}.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:53, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • : Well I do, and I'm not no one ;). The discussion at {{t1|Reflist}} seems inconclusive, but I agree that setting an em scales better on different devices. I've adopted 30em per the documentation there. Mackensen (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • This article seems fairly complete and is within striking distance of WP:GA so I will put it on Hold. I will monitor responses to my concerns and reevaluate within about 7 days.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:55, 7 December 2013 (UTC)