User talk:Cold Season#while you (not having edited the article before)

Hey Cold Season

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Would appreciate your comments here after your recent participation in this discussion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. This was my mistake, I didn't realize there was an article for the Nanyue campaign. I have expanded the scope of the article so that it discusses all of the Han campaigns against the Baiyue, so it fits the title Southward expansion of the Han Dynasty better.--Taiping Tulip (talk) 07:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Cold Season, I noticed you deleted File:Tianxia en-zh-hans.svg again on 5 July and was going to revert. But assuming in good faith that you didn't see my previous request to explain your reasons, I first will ask again. Thanks, Keahapana (talk) 21:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Treasure voyages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 20px This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- {{User-multi

|doc=yes

|User=Khazar2

|1=t

}} 18:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

The article Treasure voyages you nominated as a good article has failed 20px; see Talk:Treasure voyages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- {{User-multi

|doc=yes

|User=Khazar2

|1=t

}} 18:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Cold Season. I noticed that user Philg88 has made some nice maps of early China, and asked if he could help us. As you can see here, he is willing. Your opinions on the 四夷 map will be valuable. Keahapana (talk) 23:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

:Apologies, I should have read the talk page for Hsigo first. sorry ^^ Kayau (talk · contribs) 01:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

::Nothing to apologize for. My edit summary could have been perhaps a bit clearer on hindsight. --Cold Season (talk) 14:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Could I ask you to look in at User talk:Enok#Noodles vs pasta? Thanks! jmcw (talk) 10:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

the last merger discussion is here, where is the new one? Frietjes (talk) 18:25, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

:The last merger discussion was focused on the noodle versus pasta debate, for which it resulted in no consensus. Meanwhile the Chinese noodle vs noodle in general was neglected, noting that this was a multi-proposal, I may make this this bold edit per Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. --Cold Season (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

::so the next step is revert? Frietjes (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|style = notice

|small =

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 21 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yongle Emperor's campaigns against the Mongols, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ming China's armies deployed their cannons to defeat the Oyirad Mongol hordes at the Kerulen and Tula rivers in 1414? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yongle Emperor's campaigns against the Mongols. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [http://stats.grok.se/en/201401/Yongle_Emperor%27s_campaigns_against_the_Mongols quick check]) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

}} Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

:Thank you, it's a very interesting and dynamic subject to write about. --Cold Season (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for find the Ten Thousand Buddhas Monastery link error in Chinese dragon. Apparently there is more than one monastery with that name. I have proposed moving the Ten Thousand Buddhas Monastery article and creating a disambiguation page. Your participation would be helpful, so check it out here: Talk:Ten Thousand Buddhas Monastery. Badon (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Cold Season! I've been moving lots of articles on Chinese history to their new titles with uncapitalized "dynasty". I'm mostly done with the Ming and Qing, and I've done several on the Han, but there are a few pages I can't move. Economy of the Han Dynasty is move-protected. The other ones (presumably with an edited redirect) are Chen Cheng (Ming Dynasty), Economy of the Ming Dynasty, History of the Han Dynasty, History of the Ming Dynasty, Islam during the Ming Dynasty, Tibet during the Ming Dynasty. I'd be very grateful if you could use your superior powers to move them to where they belong! {{=3|friend}} Otherwise keep up the good work! All the best, Madalibi (talk) 08:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Cold Season, I know that it was my mistake for not citing information but can you PLEASE remind me next time more politely? Thanks!

Dustinliu76 (talk)Dustinliu75

:You interacted with me with along the lines of "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hongzhi_Emperor&diff=prev&oldid=498754483 U mad bro? or just jealous?]" (that was one of your socks that I quoted) and you ask me to be more politely in speech. Now that's some sanctimonious fluff right there. I do not have to be anything more than straightforward to you, which is not impolite and more than you've given me. Anyway, I haven't talked to you for months. --Cold Season (talk) 00:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I am very sorry that I talked to you in this way. But your tone was kind of impolite. Anyways, this was two years ago so can we put this behind our backs so we can move on? Please reply, thanks. Dustinliu76 (talk)

:(1) My tone.... or my manner of speech has been quite consistently straightforward; maybe it's the content that you find negative. I don't know. (2) I responded to the matter at hand, because you decided to bring "this" up after we haven't interacted for many months. I can assure you that I haven't thought about this at all, but sure. --Cold Season (talk) 16:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I brought this up because I felt bad about the things I said to you.Dustinliu76 (talk)

:There's nothing to feel bad about, since I do not particularly care or have interest about people's minor mannerisms (those not attacking and malicious). My point was that one should also reciprocate what he or she expects from others, otherwise it's hypocritical. Anyway... I find straightforwardness more appropriate than feigned formality. --Cold Season (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

The short and long citations are two parts of the references supporting the content of the article, and some editors prefer to put them in the same "References" section. Both styles are in use in a large number of articles. Please don't edit war to force your preference of style. Kanguole 09:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

• Firstly, I did one (partly) revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fanqie&diff=615880712&oldid=615864685], which is not edit warring; you did two [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fanqie&diff=prev&oldid=615864685][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fanqie&diff=next&oldid=615880712]. So just don't even go there.
• Secondly, you explicitly stated that "these are references" when I changed the header from Works cited to Bibliography. I pointed out that a Bibliography is not the same as Further reading. This is a simple matter. There's no mention that you didn't preferred the "style", so don't tiptoe around next time.
• Thirdly, you know very well what the original style of citations was (long form citations) when the article was beyond a stub, namely not your preference of style. You can have your way, but don't be a hypocrite. --Cold Season (talk) 09:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

LOL, there would not have been an edit war' if there were no participants, that includes you and your other account, Balthazarduju. So bring it on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddragonawakens (talk • contribs) 09:08, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

:I have always found it predictable that exposed sock puppet users (like yourself) often retort with the useless "no you" reply when feeling cornered. Considering that User:Balthazarduju and I have a long-standing, differentiated, and considerable contribution history, I will just say... feel free to report as I feel no concern for your "counter" accusation. There's nothing to "bring on", since this is not a battle but you being disruptive. And just so you know, your swearing and cussing (rather than engagement in civil discussion) in your talkpage has been duly noted and added to the edit warring report about you. --Cold Season (talk) 11:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I think the best thing to do is just combine both figures. "Presumed dead" and "killed" is the same thing anyway. None of it is contradicting the other. Just a suggestion. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 23:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

:Presumed dead and killed are not the same. Anyway, see the article talkpage. --Cold Season (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

::Alright then, "presumed killed" and "killed" are the same then. Happy? Supersaiyen312 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

{{Outdent|::}}It's already over, at least hopefully for now. Saying "Vietnamese report" is fine, you don't have to remove it.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=620712749&oldid=620712308] However, they are all "still" saying the same thing, so it does not matter who says it. I only removed it because you said, "since when is a figure from chinese newspaper an vietnamese figure".[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=620421689&oldid=620421237] Again, it does not matter "who" says it. (For example, if the actual "ships had sunk" then there is no denying that the ships had sunk then, as it's most likely true.) And "dead" and "presumed dead" are the same thing. This wasn't supposed to be some big thing.

And I said I don't care about your conflict of interest defending China, because I defend China too. So if we're both defending China, then I don't care. Only I also go for both sides. That's why it said it does not matter about your conflict of interest (if we both like China) and I like both sides. If the conversation is over, then there is no need to unnecessarily go off-topic. Again, that's why I said your COI doesn't matter. Even though it's clear what your main area of interest is, if you're still angry about the "conflict of interest" thing, then I think it's best if we remove our conversation, avoid each other, and act like we never crossed paths. (and this whole thing was probably a mis-understanding anyway.) It's over, so leave it alone. And lets try to shake hands now and walk away. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 20:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

:Yes, my point was that the sources state that it is a Vietnamese figure and you shouldn't have removed it, and I only unwillingly made that compromise because you kept removing that it was a Vietnamese figure.

:You state that you defend whatever, but I care about what reliable sources explicitly state. I do not give you my consent to remove the talkpage discussion, even if you're throwing accusations without evidence at me rather than comment strictly on content, since I have nothing to hide. You may strike your comments as warranted by the Wikipedia guidelines, but I will not enforce your habit of removing or refracting talkpage comments, which has been in place since [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Supersaiyen312&oldid=603945990#Why_am_I_blocked.3F your sock puppetry period], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Supersaiyen312&oldid=617563404#Refactoring_talk_page your post-sock puppetry period], and even this dispute (without permission). I will not actively look for you. I hope that was your final say, so yeah... "let's". --Cold Season (talk) 23:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

::Here we go in circles again... First of all, I was only blocked for sockpuppetry, not "refracting talkpage comments" when I was new. And don't comment on something you don't know the situation of. And again, I was allowed to remove your off topic harassment. And now it looks like you still want to drag this out after all. And no, I didn't keep removing it.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=620435231&oldid=620421940][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=620693740&oldid=620577251][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=620699088&oldid=620697775] We've already gone over this again and again now, and it looks like it is not going to end afterall. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 23:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

:::Mentioning someone's sockpuppetry history is not harassment. Anyway, you know what's particularly striking; you quoted diffs that show you adding uncited information in front of references (the last diff even showing you stating that I "admitted" that your added bit was supported by the ref, while I admitted to no such thing). Like I said, I care about sources. You did remove it [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=next&oldid=620435231][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=next&oldid=620699088]. --Cold Season (talk) 23:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

::::It is harassment in this case if it has nothing to do with the discussion, and you are only resorting to it because you have nothing else to say and ignoring the rest of the conversation. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 00:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::The hypocrisy. --Cold Season (talk) 00:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::: Hypocrisy is throwing around WP:PERSONAL as a personal attack. If you can't cut it out, at least keep it out of article talkspace. betafive 04:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::I've quoted the exact application of WP:PERSONAL, provided a diff of said edit, and provided an explanation. If you don't have something of value to contribute, then don't. --Cold Season (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::: The hypocrisy. --betafive 04:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::The thing is, you can't deny that I didn't substantiated my statements [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AJohnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=620700947&oldid=605763445] and you can't back up your statement that I just throw it around. So call it all you want. --Cold Season (talk) 04:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::: I just did! :-P betafive 05:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::::The hypocrisy of throwing around "hypocrisy" as whatever. --Cold Season (talk) 05:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::::: Glad we agree. betafive 05:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::::::I was referring to you, but I'll wait for you to back up that I didn't substantiate it [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AJohnson_South_Reef_Skirmish&diff=620700947&oldid=605763445] rather than throw it around. And don't post on my talk page until you do. --Cold Season (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

::::::::::::::Since we already came to agreement, I had no plans to, but now I need to make sure you're aware that this page is not "yours." It belongs to the community, and you are not entitled to prevent me from posting here. betafive 05:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::You have no plans to, because you talk nonsense that you can't back up and not because we came to an agreement. And yes, I am aware, let me rephrase it: don't bother me on my talk page with this nonsense. --Cold Season (talk) 05:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

{{od|:::::::::::::::}}How bout this: you keep yours out of article talkspace and off ANI, and I'll give the community's User talk:Cold Season page wide berth. Deal? betafive 05:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:I have no desire to humor your thinly-veiled pointy requests or sarcasm in your edit summary. --Cold Season (talk) 06:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

::Well, then I have no desire to humour your thinly-veiled pointy requests either. Peace! betafive 14:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:::I was blunt and there's nothing thinly-veiled about me saying "stop bothering me." And seriously, stop trying to annoy me for whatever point you are trying to make. Bye. --Cold Season (talk) 15:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

I made new request on another different title; please join in. --George Ho (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Cold_Season_reported_by_User:Elfie99_.28Result:_Reporting_editor_blocked.29 Fyi].... Wifione ^Message 11:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

:Thanks. Yeah, the user has been socking for a while and evading blocks. --Cold Season (talk) 19:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Merge-arrows.svg An article that you have been involved in editing, Bixie, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. John Hill (talk) 01:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I seem to recall finding that that could be sourced, but didn't get around to it. My memory may be fault, the sources may have been unclear. I'm sure I decided not to delete it though. Dougweller (talk) 11:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:I had glanced at it and saw {{citation needed|date=December 2013}} behind it. Feel free to add a source whenever you stumble at one again, you don't really have to notify me for that. --Cold Season (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Cold Season, thanks for your continued contributions. I've noticed that you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Filial_piety&diff=632677808&oldid=630836409 removed] the entire section about filial cannibalism from Filial piety. While the section did probably have WP:UNDUE weight and should be summarized, I don't feel removing the entire section is warranted. Filial cannibalism is well documented and was often praised in Chinese history, and I think it deserves a section in the article. -Zanhe (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

:I found that it had it was placed there not for the topic but for the novelty of it. There was no focus on filial piety. --Cold Season (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Cold Season, thanks for filing the WP:AN3 complaint against Cydevil38. I was actually planning to file a complaint on WP:ANI, but since you've already acted, I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FEdit_warring&diff=635948650&oldid=635932208 added my evidence] to your complaint. However, please be aware that you're required to notify the user when you file a complaint against them. {{u|Bbb23}} did it for you in this case, but please remember to do it yourself in the future. -Zanhe (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

:Sure. Anyway, yeah... mixed up policies, I guess. I hadn't filed a case in a while. --Cold Season (talk) 23:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

You have a reply. --George Ho (talk) 07:19, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

You can't fight a POV pusher by edit warring with him. You can revert once. That's right, just once, and then you have to report him. If you edit war with them it muddies the waters, making it harder for an uninvolved editor to see who is wrong. Jehochman ^Talk 16:01, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

In these other move discussions:

• Talk:Lau Kong-wah
• Talk:Jasper Tsang Yok-sing
• Talk:Gary Fan Kwok-wai
• Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen
• Talk:Wong Sing-chi
• Talk:Connie Mak Kit-man

TheAvatar (discuss–?) 18:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

An extreme edit war over the result in the infobox that has lasted for almost a year now. Could use your help. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sino-French_War&action=history 172.56.32.200 (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

:I don't edit within that area, so I can't really help you with that. --Cold Season (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

I wanted to say something same as well, so I am writing under this thread. Supersaiyen312‎ is now indefinitely blocked again for socking. This time it was worst that he used a sock account and he would do nothing except making copy paste the arguments. Check WP:ANI#WP:BLUD on a AfD. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

:I see that it's resolved and that the user is banned, which I'm rather glad about. I think I will spend a few minutes being slightly smug in being right, since I also had made a report which resulted into nothing. Yeah, I had problems with the user before at a certain article and on my talkpage above. That user seems really sanctimonious in regards to his/her socking and disruption. I'm rather surprised at the large scale of it to be honest. --Cold Season (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

::You are rightfully surprised, WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Xharm is still opened. I had opened it before he got blocked, maybe a few more accounts are yet to be terminated. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Cold Season,

I am Allen Lin, a computer science PhD student at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are working on a project studying the main article and sub article relationship in a purpose of better serving the Wikipedia article structure. We noticed that you've created main/sub article relationship in Chinese ceramics for Yixing clay. So it would be appreciated if you could take 4-5 minutes to finish the survey questions. Thanks in advance! We will not collect any of your personally information.

Thank you for your time to participate this survey. Your response is important for us!

https://umn.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bvm2A1lvzYfJN9H — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheetah90 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Cold Season,

I saw your edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tirgil34 here]. If you have anything to add regarding the same sock master/long-term abuser (e.g. WP:OTHERSITES), you can share it on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Tirgil34 LTA page] or can mention them on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Long-term_abuse/Tirgil34 talk page]. Such contributions/additions provide a significant informations in SPI cases. Bests, 46.221.228.215 (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cold Season. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

File:Merge-arrows.svg An article that you have been involved in editing—Perilla—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Diospireiro (talk) 10:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your undo: "It's not 60; And this is worded worse, since it now seems that Euro/E.Asian have 20% of the total INTROGRESSED seq. The text talks about the population and not individuals anyway". You are correct in numbers, I meant 600 (broadly) and apologise for the error. The researchers may have extrapolated to the population level but the study was based on individuals - a future broader study may find an even higher percentage so it is not definitive. The current wording indicates that in any one Eurasian you will find 20% Neanderthal genome, and that conflicts with a DNA figure of 1-4% given earlier in the article. However this is written, it will need to reconcile or explain this difference. My understanding is that the researchers were able to recover 20% of the Neanderthal genome after "pooling" the results of the human sequences. Over to you. Regards, William Harris • (talk) • 23:46, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

::"The current wording indicates that in any one Eurasian you will find 20% Neanderthal genome, and that conflicts with a DNA figure of 1-4% given earlier in the article."

:(1) I do not see how the wording indicates that though, so... that would be on me. If it does indicate that, it would indeed be wrong. I don't not oppose a re-wording anyway. What do you suggest? (2) I do think the your new wording also raises confusion, which is the reason to revert.

::"My understanding is that the researchers were able to recover 20% of the Neanderthal genome after "pooling" the results of the human sequences."

:Your understanding is correct. --Cold Season (talk) 00:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

{{ping|Cold Season}} "The stories of Manora/Manohara told in Southeast Asia are related to the stories of the Cowherd and the Celestial Weaver Girl, popular in China, Japan and Korea" and another quote, "It is generally accepted that the tale of Manora (Manohara) told in Southeast Asia has become conflated with the story of the Cowherd and the Celestial Weaver Girl, popular in China, Korea, and Japan." Here are the two quotes that you were asking for. (120.144.19.54 (talk) 10:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC))

:Sure. Related and conflation isn't really just a differing variation, so that could be worded more precise. --Cold Season (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

::Okay, I will make that change. (120.144.19.54 (talk) 11:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC))

::Nevermind, I noticed you already made the change. Thanks. (120.144.19.54 (talk) 11:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC))

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cold Season. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Hi Cold Season, thank you so much for uploading the pictures of the disciples of Confucius! I've seen them a lot and thought of uploading them, but was unsure of their provenance. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 19:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

:No problem. There's like 106 more [http://painting.npm.gov.tw/Painting_Page.aspx?dep=P&PaintingId=1891 portraits in the museum database], but the files are of much lower quality, so I'm kind putting off uploading those for now (especially since the files need cropping). The 14 files uploaded were available high quality, only because the museum used them for the [http://theme.npm.edu.tw/exh106/Confucius/en/page-2.html#main website of the Confucius exhibition] earlier in this year. --Cold Season (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

I don't know what problem you have for the Manchus, but I think we had this conversation before. If you don't mind, we can do this over and over again.

Quotes are optional. I have provided pages for each reference which matches the content very well. These are all reliable source. However, you are actually the one that is specifically targeting Manchu people. You have been doing this for many years by misstating the reference. Your quote and reference are meaningless because it does not matter how many reference you are citing, it all came from Shirokogorov's research in 1924. The book has already mentioned that his research is based on his visit to Amur River in Northern Manchuria in the 1900s, that is far away from giving a conclusion for a culture. You can't play WP:I just don't like it for your own interests.--Šolon (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

:I'm not WP:I just don't like it. You are. You write with a sole MANCHU WP:POV by willing trying to curb any info about Manchu people's cultural practices that isn't to your liking. And even now you are arguing in that way here. It is well cited to several researchers, such as Barre, Henderson, and others.

:Secondly, info about cultural practices for HEALTH or others does not belong in an article about AFFECTION.

:Thirdly, info about disgust need to be about disgust, as explicitly mentioned in the sources and not from own biases of what's disgusting.

:Fourthly, a quote is needed, as you need to establish that your info is in fact factual and relevant by providing a quote when it is contested. If you refuse to do so, it means that you show explicit unwillingness to resolve an issue (and that's on you).

:Fifthly, do what over again? Fixing you trying to remove well cited info (about Manchu cultural practices) that you don't like, and fixing you trying to misconstrue sources in places that are not related to the topic?

:--Cold Season (talk) 23:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

::I have reproduced the discussion at Talk:Public_display_of_affection#Disgust_and_Public_display_of_affection. --Cold Season (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

::First, I am trying to reach a consensus instead of arguing.It doesn't matter how many researchers you have. They all came from Shirokogorov's research, Barre, Henderson, and others are just citing the reference. Why don't you post their bibliography? Because you know that'd absolutely against your favor.

::Secondly, my source is about affection of Chinese parents towards different situation.

::Thirdly, your quotos have nothing to do with disgust. My source even mentioned that Chinese and Vietnamese consume human placenta, which is done by psychologist Rachel Sarah Herz. It is obviously not from "own biases of what's disgusting."

::Fourthly, Quote is not required as you can see in so many Featured and Good Articles. Pages number is good enough.--Šolon (talk) 23:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

::Fifthly, you are overly dedicated on posting these stuff in many articles. You are obviously WP:I just like it. Like what I told you, the research was done in a visit in Northern Manchuria, but you are focusing on playing WP:I just like it and wouldn't listen.

--Šolon (talk) 23:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cold Season. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cold Season. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Hi Cold Season, thanks for your new article Battle of Palembang (1407). I've nominated it for DYK, please see nomination page. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 05:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

:Thanks! I appreciate it. --Cold Season (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 26 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Palembang (1407), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1407, Admiral Zheng He's treasure fleet defeated the pirate force of Chen Zuyi, who had occupied Palembang in today's Indonesia, and sent him back to China for execution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Palembang (1407). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-02-16&end=2019-03-08&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Battle_of_Palembang_(1407) Battle of Palembang (1407)]), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} — Maile (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Arkillo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

hello admin. please remove this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Turkish_offensive_into_north-eastern_Syria&diff=922094347&oldid=922091209 addition from the page. it has nothing to do with the topic. i can't edit that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.126.84.157 (talk) 10:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

:Sure, I've removed it. I'm not an admin. Cheers, --Cold Season (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

The last edit you made on barisha raid in syria by U.S Forces a dog was also involved there and the gender of tge dog is mentioned on this page is that of male whereas the dogs own biography in the wikipedia is listed as female so I request you that please fix the typo. Ritvik0 (talk) 11:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

:I don't know what you're talking about, as I haven't made any edits about the gender of a dog... --Cold Season (talk) 11:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

::Anyway, I've taken the trouble to find the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barisha_raid&type=revision&diff=923708921&oldid=923708716 edit] that you're probably talking about. It was made by another user, who corrected the information (as Newsweek seemingly updated their article with a correction). --Cold Season (talk) 11:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

| 1 = Hello, Cold Season. Killing of Luo Changqing, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

|2=Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

}}

Hello, I made an ANI-notice for User:Horse Eye Jack. You can find it here. Your input would be appreciated. Best regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Please see relevant discussion at User talk:Designate#Surname clarification at top of articles – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Hey, as you've been part of the discussion at 2019-20 Hong Kong Protests on the Luo passage in the lead, your input is requested in the continued discussion at the Talk on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%9320_Hong_Kong_protests&diff=943842767&oldid=943770386 this as the adopted version.] You can reach the Talk here: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2019%E2%80%9320_Hong_Kong_protests#Second_section_break 1] Sleath56 (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

}}

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

}}

Making sure you are aware of these relevant DS systems in effect.

Please also—as I recently said on article talk—be aware of WP:ONUS ("The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is upon those seeking to include disputed content."). Regards, --Neutrality^talk 01:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Saint Walker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

}} NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Per your previous involvement in the same subject matter. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

I've begun my first pass at copyediting the article Ming treasure voyages. Expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 22:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic :Killing of Luo Changqing. Thank you. Deryck C. 17:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

: I apologise for the impersonal templating (hence this custom message) - this templated message seems to be a policy requirement for opening an ANI thread. Deryck C. 17:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that - browser jump is annoying. Acroterion (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

There is a discussion regarding your edit. on 86'd. Lightburst (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey, you contributed significantly to Chopsticks. Even though you may not have edited it since 2014, I thought I would still check with you. I think the article can use a holistic revision. I [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chopsticks#Enhancing_this_article_holistically posted a proposal] on the talk page. It would be great to have your feedback before or while the revision takes place. Fred Hsu (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Ming treasure voyages has to be one of the most impressive articles I've seen on WP. I would sincerely recommend you bring it WP:GAN or WP:FAC—it would be a mighty fine addition, and I would be happy to chip in a review in either venue. Aza24 (talk) 19:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Special:Diff/1024347915, the assertion that I have not edited the article before is false. Please familiarize yourself with the "Find edits by user" feature located at the top of the history page. But more importantly, the question of whether I've edited the article before is irrelevant. Please familiarize yourself with WP:OWN: {{tqb|No one "owns" content (including articles or any page at Wikipedia). If you create or edit an article, others can make changes, and you cannot prevent them from doing so. In addition, you should not undo their edits without good reason.}}

Einsof (talk) 03:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ming treasure voyages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Death of Chow Tsz-lok. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Ohc ^{revolution of our times} 13:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Again, my apologies for the impersonal notice, but I think this hard conversation is necessary. Deryck C. 21:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

:This discussion was archived but has now been reopened with a view to formally closing. SpinningSpark 06:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

The article Ming treasure voyages you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ming treasure voyages for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Well... I assure you 2 months is no where near typical for GANs. Sorry you had to go through that, but I'm thrilled to see the positive result. Having a high quality and easily accessible article on such a seminal event will surely be extremely beneficial for generations to come—congrats! Aza24 (talk) 04:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

:Thank you for your words of support and for convincing me to nominate the article (I would probably have let it sit for a fairly long time otherwise). --Cold Season (talk) 13:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Crazy Jane Doom Patrol 63.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Sita Chan on 16 April 2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 219.78.190.230 (talk) 13:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Lightray - Jack Kirby's Fourth World Gallery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Cold Season! You might recall our brief exchanges about the terrific Ming treasure voyages article in the past. I stumbled across it again today, and wondered if you had any future plans to bring other articles to GA? Aza24 (talk) 08:36, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

:I have none at the moment. I've not been editing much lately. --Cold Season (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

::Ah I see, no worries. I was looking at the Zheng He article and saw much of its content on his Expeditions and earlier life was written by yourself—if you have any interest in collaborating on that article in the future do let me know. Best – Aza24 (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Reggie Long, Rorschach, no mask - Doomsday Clock 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, please have a look at WP:ES, which says that "According to the consensus policy, all edits should be explained". It appears that the vast majority of your edits are not.

When present, at least [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Myth:_Wukong&diff=prev&oldid=1242225775 one of your recent summaries] is vague (no errors specified), even though the guidelines suggest to "Avoid vagueness". [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Game_Science&diff=prev&oldid=1241760978 Another] of your summaries does not actually summarize the edit (i.e. it adds a new reference but the summary omits that), even though the same guidelines say "Avoid misleading summaries". Daisy Blue (talk) 02:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

:If you have issues with the edits, go bring it up on the article and not here. Secondly, if I say that references do not contain a specific info and I add new references in their place, it would be common sense that the new ref does (?). --Cold Season (talk) 02:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Could you upload a comparison image of Kang Jin Star in the game alongside the statue it is based on? I mean the humanoid form of Kang Jin Star in the game — Preceding unsigned comment added by YuelinLee1959 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Claiming that I am acting "fraudulently" in edit summaries is a clear violation of WP:NPA please kindly cease such behaviour and focus on the matter of the article content. Simonm223 (talk) 13:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

:Old message, I will second this. I explained a policy-based reason for a revert and got an edit summary of "you are ignorant about". IgelRM (talk) 04:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Black Myth Wukong, princess.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The file :File:Black Myth Wukong gameplay.gif has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

{{talkback|Talk:Game Science|Interview-based edits|ts=12:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)}}

Aaron Liu (talk) 12:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

{{talkback|Talk:Game Science|Interview-based edits|ts=13:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)}} Note that you can choose to not reply. I think I should start an RfC anyways. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Black Myth Wukong gameplay.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)