User talk:Dagonweb#top

Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• Community Portal
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Manual of Style
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Picture tutorial

I hope you will enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can sign your name on talk and voting pages using four tildes, (~~~~), which produces your username, the time, and the date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- getcrunkjuice^contribs 19:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

25px Welcome to Wikipedia. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Order_of_Cosmic_Engineers?diff=262481736 recent edit] you made to :The Order of Cosmic Engineers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. prashanthns (talk) 07:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

:Hello Dagaonweb! Consider nominating the article for deletion if you think it fits the criteria. Check the link. Blanking the page would be inappropriate. prashanthns (talk) 07:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning pn.svgI have nominated The Order of Cosmic Engineers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Order of Cosmic Engineers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. – Toon^(talk) 20:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop altering articles to include original research on theories about mind uploads in the Terminator Salvation movie. None of the references you are referring to make any such mention, the trailer you link to says no such things about a Terminator remembering he is on death row. A terminator can be programmed to think they are human, but there is no evidence to support uploading of minds of humans into Terminators. Canterbury Tail talk 17:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure, apart from the discussion whether or not this is a relevant topic for the Mind Upload article, I happen to know a few things from behind the screens about the T4 script. In other words, if you see the movie and in that movie Marcus Wright is indeed depicted to be an upload of a human into a terminator body, would you be willing to concede this point of inclusion was applicable in the first place? Just a simple yes or no will do, let me know in june or so, after you have seen the movie. talk 10:00, 3 May 2009 (CET)

Well? I was right wasn't I ?

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Technosis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

:A quick Google search suggets this is a neologism.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tl|dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. eaolson (talk) 03:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Editorial comments in the middle of articles are not useful. Please use the Talk pages. Thanks. DOR (HK) (talk) 06:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading :File:Tsathoggua.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Dagonweb}} your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 08:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Yah well whatever. I looked at those links above and all I got was endless endless FAQs. Where is a utton or link I can push where I can do what it is whatever the hell I am supposed to do? I drew that pic of Tsathoggua like ages ago. It's my pic, I knowingly uploaded it. What is it I need to do to avoid having the lawyers throw a hissy fit? PLEASE email me on dagonweb@gmail.com wth a clear link where I can edit the image as needed. I simply cannot traverse the maze-like mess that wikipedia has become. Dagonweb (talk) 18:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

:Slack it off! Bigtop みんな空の下 (トーク) 18:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

What does 'slack it off" mean? Dagonweb (talk) 18:39, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

:Your edits on your file description page on the file described above. Please don't be unconstructive. Also, I think you should understand on Wikipedia:Copyrights for more information. Bigtop みんな空の下 (トーク) 18:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Cool! I added this: "So where do I add information? Ok? Let's do it here since I don't have a clue where else. I drew this image. I made it. I can use it as aI damn well please right? I hereby allow Wikipedia to use it. Go ahead, have fun, use it. It's OK. *papal gesture*."

That should do it right? Great that we sorted THAT out. I wouldn't wanna be 'unconstructive', right. Dagonweb (talk) 18:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khannea Suntzu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)