User talk:Fryede#top

If you feel that this Admin is over zealous would you be prepared to join a move to get his Admin status changed and even get him banned for a while. Albatross2147 (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

:I don't think he is over-zealous. He made a mistake, acknowledged it, and fixed his mistake. Fair play as far as I'm concerned. The one I'm worried about is Nyttend. He made the first mistake, and then when it was exposed, went around and sabotaged several of my edits to try and cover it over. Fryede (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

25px Hello! Your submission of 2011 Pulitzer Prize at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath {{T:TDYK|2011 Pulitzer Prize|your nomination's entry}} and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Can you please explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Idiot_%28musical%29&curid=24353141&diff=465160313&oldid=465135598 this edit]? Why are you insisting to include the word "cum"? It does not make sense there... BOVINEBOY2008 15:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

:I insist on using it because it's the correct word to describe the situation. I refer you (again) to http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cum#Conjunction "Conjunction cum Used in indicating a thing with two or more roles, functions, or natures, or a thing that has changed from one to another." Jesus Christ, Superstar started out as a concept album and was eventually adapted as a stage musical. Hence the usage of the conjunction "cum".

::Thanks. I apparently was not familiar with the use of that word in such a way. I have only seen it in the slang and in the Latin. BOVINEBOY2008 01:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

25px Hello! Your submission of Lysistrata Jones at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rlendog (talk) 16:51, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|style = notice

|small =

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 18 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lysistrata Jones, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the ancient Greek drama Lysistrata by Aristophanes has been adapted as a Broadway musical titled Lysistrata Jones about a basketball team and its cheerleaders? {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Lysistrata Jones|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lysistrata Jones.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Lysistrata Jones|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Lysistrata Jones.}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [http://stats.grok.se/en/201112/Lysistrata_Jones quick check]) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

}} Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

25px Hello! Your submission of 2011 Liberty Bowl at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|style = notice

|small =

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 10 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2011 Liberty Bowl, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that among the players in the 2011 Liberty Bowl were the grandson of civil rights leader Ralph Abernathy and the brother of Super Bowl-winning quarterback Aaron Rodgers? {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/2011 Liberty Bowl|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2011 Liberty Bowl.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/2011 Liberty Bowl|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/2011 Liberty Bowl.}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [http://stats.grok.se/en/201201/2011_Liberty_Bowl quick check]) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

}} The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

The article American Idiot (musical) you nominated as a good article has failed 20px; see Talk:American Idiot (musical) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Achowat (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

: Could you explain this a little better? I can't figure out how to fix the article because there are no notes at Talk:Article. In addition, the link from Wikipedia:Good article nominations been deleted. There doesn't seem to be any discussion that I can track down. A little assistance would be greatly appreciated. Fryede (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

::Sorry about that, I broke the template. You were supposed to be a discussion at Talk:American Idiot (musical). I've fixed that now and hopefully clear up some confusion. It's a very fine article, easily B Class (it'd be A Class if we had that). For a template to go on to improve it up to GA, feel free to take a look at The Importance of Being Earnest, WikiProject:Theatre's Highest Priority GA. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask! (The Talk-Back was a nice touch; I appreciate that) Cheers! Achowat (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

:::Thanks for clearing that up and for the review. (Boo for failing it though! ;-) I can easily incorporate the characters into the plot section. And I'll check out TIOBE so see if there's anything I can glean from it. Before I go to all the trouble of a renomination, however, is there anything specifically that you think I should or could fix/add/update/change/etc? I'd hate to sit around for another six weeks waiting for a new review when I could spend that time improving the article. This is my first attempt at a GA, so any guidance would be appreciated. Fryede (talk) 23:46, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

::::The only other issue that might give GA Reviewers pause is the length and detail of the Plot section. I didn't comment because I didn't mind it, it made sense to go over each musical number, especially for a musical of this kind, but other GA Reviewers might not see it that way. That not, for instance, the way the MOS would have us do it. Everything else looks fine (though, again, finding more or better free/fair use images would be worthwhile). Cheers Achowat (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Template duplications on the future use of navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how these templates are organized, named, and used in future, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC).

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Pulitzer Prize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idiot Box (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Recategorising on the proposal of recategorising following the rollout exercise of the new navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how articles are reorganized in future to provide an easier index system, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC).

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the blue bar.

|

|}

|}

This Newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.

WikiProject Eurovision: This is a reminder to all members of Project Eurovision, that there is still an ongoing RfC discussion taking place at the project talk page. It is vital that everyone participates in this discussion, as it concerns the future manual of style and article layout in regards to Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year articles. This is your ideal opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas on a major issue, which will reflect on the way these articles will be written in future. Thank You! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:09, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi! This review is on now. I hope that you will help in fixing the issues that are raised. Cheers! →TSU ^tp* 14:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

:I'm on vacation this week and can't put much effort in to cleaning it up until I return next week. Fryede (talk) 22:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

::Could you tell me how long finding any possible errors will take? I was planning to complete the review and pass the article either today or tomorrow. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 04:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

{{hidden begin|toggle=left|title=Your monthly WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter has arrived. To open click "show".}}

{{hidden end}}

|-

| colspan="3" style="background-color: #E6FE80; text-align:center; border: 1px black solid; padding: 0em; border-top:1px;" |

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

We would like to welcome the following new members who joined since our July publication.

{{Col-2}}

{{Div col|cols=2}}

• {{user|Moldova96}}
• {{user|Reckless182}}
• {{user|Sang'gre Habagat}}

{{Div col end}}

{{Col-end}}

|}

Hello,

Please note that there have been some changes to operations surrounding Eurovision articles, these being that:

• Template names have now been modernised and/or megred into super-templates, for example Countries in the Eurovision Song Contest has now been merged into Template:Eurovision Song Contest making it even easier to find everything under one template. If you are planning to create a new template, please keep the standardised titles in mind. Other templates have been modernised and a full list of them can be found here.
• The Eurovision Song Contest and Junior Eurovision Song Contest articles have now been standardised to keep a consitancy throughout the project and to the genral reader too. Skeleton article drafts can be found for Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year.

If you have any questions, please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Eurovision

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/September 2012}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/16 September 2012}}

This mini memorandum has been delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/October 2012}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/November 2012}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 10:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Looks like you had problems with a recent edit on the Recent Deaths page regarding an edit conflict. You managed to double the size of the page and made it temporarily inaccessible. I think that I have returned it to near normal functioning. In the future if you find yourself with an edit question please find an editor at the help desk or just back out of the edit and try it again.

Nothing terribly upsetting as mistakes happen. If you have any questions, please feel free to send me a message and i will try and help you out. Thanks. Sunnydoo (talk) 03:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/December 2012}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/January 2013}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/February 2013}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/March 2013}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:14, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/April 2013}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/May 2013}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thanks for uploading :File:Skip-holtz-sale-of-the-century.jpg, which you've attributed to (TV screenshot). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{tl|OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{tl|non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Fryede}} your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/June 2013}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/30 June 2013}}

This memo was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/July 2013/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/August 2013/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/September 2013/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 12:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your upload of :File:2011LibertyBowlFinalScoreboard.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, :File:Beaver Tower.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters/Issue 43/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of {{U|Wesley Mouse}} 13:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Dear Project Eurovision Member,

There is a serious discussion been created at the WikiProject Eurovision talk page that requires utmost attention from all, or as many members as possible, as this could bear a huge impact on the project as a whole. Please click here to read the discussion, and participate peacefully. Thank you.
This message was delivered at 04:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC) by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of Project Eurovision Newsdesk

25px Hello! Your submission of LearnedLeague at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/Issue 44/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of {{U|Wesley Mouse}} 18:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/Issue 45/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 11:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/28 February 2015}}

This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 16:17, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/Issue 46/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision 10:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/1 April 2015}}

This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 10:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/1 July 2015}}

This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 13:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/Issue 47/Delivery}}

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision 16:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/5 October 2016}}

This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 21:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Fryede. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Fryede. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

:{{small|Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)}}

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Diggil-ej has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this radio program passes WP:NMEDIA/GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Kris Boswell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG/WP:NBIO. No inline references so a possible WP:BLP issue. No sv interwiki to expand from. BEFORE does not show any in-depth coverage (if you deprod this, please add at least two in-depth independent sources about the subject as required by GNG).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Boswell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :SR Sverige has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Digital-only radio channel that existed for presumably few years, maybe 10+? Fails WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Sv wiki article is even less complete than this. Unreferenced, both of them.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SR Sverige until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

{{User Good Article|Eurovision Song Contest}}{{-}}

The Eurovision Song Contest, which you have looked after now and again, has been listed as a Good Article. Thank you for your contributions. SilkTork (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Mony Marc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO and falls under WP:ONEEVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/News/13 August 2023}} Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

A request for comment regarding the future of WikiProject Eurovision is currently ongoing. A proposal by Sims2aholic8 has been opened for comment, and a discussion is now taking place to determine consensus on whether WikiProject Eurovision should be rescoped and renamed WikiProject Song Contests. You are invited to read the proposed changes to the WikiProject at the discussion page and to participate by voting on the proposed changes and adding any comments or further proposals. This discussion will remain open until 31 January 2025, at which point, if consensus has been reached, further discussions will take place on the exact changes agreed.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add :Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2025 (UTC)