User talk:LtNOWIS

• I agree. You worded it much better than I was able to. Riffsyphon1024 02:21, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Thanks. I had the manual with me. -LtNOWIS 03:33, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I stand corrected, though if France hasn't actually been mentioned in an episode, it might be worth noting the source for the information, since it's always possible a future episode might contradict it. (I don't know what Abram's standing is re:canon; Star Trek, for example, discounts everything that isn't mentioned on screen, even official profiles. According to the official profile for Jack Bristow, he was born in Canada, but I don't think this has ever been confirmed on screen, either. 23skidoo 04:20, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Might I ask what the hell could GRider be doing by making all of these articles Vfds. I can agree that some could be merged, but others like the Repulsorlift article that I created, should not suffer the wave of Vfd that he has been applying. This is utter nonsense, and its forces me to defend all SW articles like I'm Everyking with his little Ashlee Simpson fetish. Comments? -- Riffsyphon1024 03:18, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

::Well, you could talk to him. I don't know why he wants to nominate all these at once, instead of only a couple. But I guess we have little choice but to go to VfD and do a search of all instances of "Star Wars" on the page, and plead their cases. Is there a guideline/rule regarding someone's deletion requests per topic per day? If not, there should be. You could complain to an administrater about his completely unfair methods, but I'm content to just thwart them. I'll contact Shadowtrooper, and let him know the situation.-LtNOWIS 03:29, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The Star Wars Wiki is now up and running at [Removed Wikicities link OCT 2013]. -- Riffsyphon1024 11:06, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

• I dunno. I'd really like to preserve the interlinkability and quality of having Star Wars stuff on Wikipedia. Like when you research the LAAT and there's a link to helicopter gunship. I guess we could use mirroring a lot. We'd be allowed to copy content back and forth freely, right?-LtNOWIS 16:35, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Supposedly, but all the minor stuff that is being Vfd'd in the Great Lucascruft Purge needs to be transwikied to the Wookieepedia. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:50, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

Hi LtNOWIS,

Please don't take down the VfD header from an article (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Trade Federation PAC) while it's still being debated.

Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 18:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC). (P.S. I grew up in Reston!)

• And now its gone. I wanted this to be transwikied to the Star Wars Wiki [Removed Wikicities link OCT 2013]. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:20, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Sorry, I thought the debating was done. How long does it usually last for, like a week? 10 days?-LtNOWIS 16:35, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• It doesn't matter now. The admin temporarily reinstated it so I could copy the text and repost it at SWW. He doesn't like them to redirect however. He explained that the list of vehicles would be the place to direct to these articles at SWW. -- Riffsyphon1024 17:19, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

Oh, really? It just seemed like vandalism to me. I guess it's just the way he put it. Well, sorry about that. bob rulz 04:19, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Do you want to help me finish them off EG Peace Brigade

SGCommand

Thanks for the keep vote on Starfleet ranks and insignia. I'm South Lakes High School, Class of 1993! -Husnock 9 July 2005 06:17 (UTC)

• Cool! Anyways, the keep vote really was a no-brainer, compared to some of the other fancruft votes.-LtNOWIS 9 July 2005 06:20 (UTC)

The official site is not the top authority on canon. Only the movies are. Adamwankenobi 20:25, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

• Well, it's not top, but it's pretty far up there. It doesn't contradict the films, but rather confirms what they imply. Mace dies, according to Star Wars canon.-LtNOWIS 06:44, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

This may not satisfy all of your needs, but if you don't show some support, we're not likely to get even this much. — Xiong熊talk* 10:47, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

I noticed you are categorized as a Wikipedian by alignment. If you are in to userboxes, there are now infoboxes available using a standard template. See the alignment category page for details.

This is a copied announcement, please reply on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xaosflux&action=edit§ion=23 My Talk Page] or in the category talk if you have any questions. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 18:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanking ye for the vandalism revert on my user page - much appreciated :) Barneyboo (Talk) 22:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• No problem. I just happened to be in the right place at the right time. It's always dubious when an anon edits a user page. -LtNOWIS 18:20, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello!

Thank you for contributions. I have realized that you have edited a Star Wars related article. If you wish there is a Star Wars WikiProject which you can join and help us edit Wikipedia’s Star Wars articles. Wikipedia also has the following Star Wars related projects:

• Star Wars WikiProject discussion
• Index of the best Star Wars articles
• Star Wars things to do
• Star Wars Portal
• Star Wars Selected Article voting

If you have any questions just ask at the Star Wars WikiProject.

Again, Thank you for your help! Jedi6-(need help?) 22:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey, Nowis! I've read your comments on the aformentioned articles. Please explain your thinking more to me, as your definately have more experience than I. If necessary, I'll add a description for every ship: it's condensed history, commander, accomplishments, famous battles it was at, and where it was destroyed.

Thanks,

RelentlessRouge 11:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello, Lt. Nowis. Check out List of Star Wars ships. I've only been working for a few hours, but if you could spend a few minutes of your invaluable time and check out how it is, it'd be great. Look at the Super Star Destroyer section. Thnx.

Cheers!

RelentlessRouge 23:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

You have worked on Naming the American Civil War within the last few months. I am stepping back from the article for a day or so to avoid an edit war. My request is that you consider stepping in to apply some peer pressure in the interest of civility, NPOV, assuming good faith, etc. It's up to you. -- Alarob 00:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey thanks, I did actually think about that. It would probably be much more suited on Wookiepedia than on an encyclopedia hah. I'll link you to it once i move it. I'll put in the discussion to have it removed too. GunnerChief 09:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

• added: [http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Rage_of_the_Shadow_Warriors Rage of the Shadow Warriors]GunnerChief 09:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, LtNOWIS, this is my first AFD. I found it referred to in the article Ryan's Mom and didn't notice it was an actual redirect, although when I first visited the page it was recursive. Sartan 00:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

• Yeah, no problem. Also, vandalism page like that just speedied, instead of going on AfD. -LtNOWIS 00:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi there,

Tank you for your work stubsorting. I just wanted to tell you that it is customary to place the stug tagged at the bottom on the page, usually underneath the categories and the other languages, not in the body of the article unless its an expand section tag. Thanks--Thomas.macmillan 20:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

• Ok, thanks. Yeah, I'm not used to doing it that way, but I'll keep that in mind. -LtNOWIS 02:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading :Image:Born_To_Fly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 21:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in :Category:Wikipedians_in_Virginia, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 22:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

leftHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on :BlasTech, by {{#ifeq:1|1|Schutz (talk · contribs),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because :BlasTech is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting :BlasTech, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

I just saw the comment you made a few years ago and I thought it was very good. I totally agree. --Igor at work 01:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

There was none. The one you removed depicts the official Imperial symbol of state, the double-headed eagle on the yellow background, and the red/white/blue cockade and sash colours (though these were discontinued shortly before in 1810).--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 00:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

25px Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test {{#if:Agent Orange|on the page :Agent Orange}} worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} TestEditBot (talk) 23:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

• heh, This bot could do with reading Wikipedia:AGF Theterribletwins1111 (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Good work on adding links to the pages of the respective towns, it looks alot cooler now :) I think you should consider doing that for all pages. Also, if you are interested in radio stations, please consider joining the radio station Wikiproject. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • March 11, 2009 @ 08:54

• Thanks, but I'm not organized enough to make this a habit. But it's quite easy to add in the town names, since Wikipedia has all the town articles. Just takes a lot of time... -LtNOWIS (talk)

::No worries :) It does take a little time in some areas, some are just easy. Thanks again for putting the time into the page. - NeutralHomer • Talk • March 11, 2009 @ 15:45

There is indisputable the U.S. victory in other battles of the U.S.-Mexican war, but in the Buena Vista battle the U.S. victory is not quite credible and questionable. You need to reference and weighting just among historians from both sides without any nationalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.175.255.165 (talk) 01:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey! Chzz asked me if I could edit Template:Country data Dominica, adding the older flag into the template. I added it as "var4" so that the existing uses of the template aren't affected by this new change. You can see my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Country_data_Dominica&diff=308799485&oldid=177492450 two] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Country_data_Dominica&diff=308799939&oldid=308799485 diffs] to see what I did. :-) Killiondude (talk) 01:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on :Native Americans in Virginia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:16, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Soviet Russian Kamrad (talk) 11:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Redneck's vocabulary wuz funny, wasn't it?

Soviet Russian Kamrad (talk) 07:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)As I can see, you are american. So, can you help me with one word?

How is "anti-" pronounced?(In words like anti-aircraft, anti-tank) I heard 2 variants: Ant-eye and An-tee. Which one is correct?

• Ant-eye is more common, but I've heard it both ways. -LtNOWIS (talk) 23:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Soviet Russian Kamrad (talk) 08:08, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Thanks, dude.

You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 19:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, just realised that I overwrote your warning on User talk:95.116.166.248, I noticed that you had added {{tl|uw-redirect1}} and I just thought I'd explain why I added {{tl|uw-redirect3}}: the IP had previously reverted a revert of the page to remove their vandalism and it was obviously bad faith against the featured article for today, thanks. --Searle, L. (talk) 09:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

• No worries. -LtNOWIS (talk) 09:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg A tag has been placed on :Tim bridgewater requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tl|hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Frank  {{!}}  talk  16:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

• I don't think this notice was really necessary, seeing as how I didn't write the article. But, no worries. -LtNOWIS (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Two templates for the price of one! :)

right

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{tl|User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{tl|Rollback}} top icon on your user page

:If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--You might like to look at Twinkle to help you with warning vandals. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks, I really appreciate it. -LtNOWIS (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

I was wondering why did you change |align="center"| to |style="text-align:center;"| there is no difference and the second one just takes up more space?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• It's part of the "common fixes" made by [http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/Dab_solver Dab solver]. I don't know why it's supposedly better this way. -LtNOWIS (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Just letting you know that your edit of the above article this morning went wrong. I see you are using DAB - it added ref tags around items which were below the reflist template on the page, in external links etc. Caused the page to end up on the maintenance lists for a broken ref problem. Just a heads-up: you may need to be careful how you use DAB in these situations. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 11:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

• Sorry about that! I'll try to be more careful in the future. -LtNOWIS (talk) 04:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, LtNOWIS:

Several days ago, you made a post on the talk page of the template {{Tl|Current U.S. First Spouses}} questioning if it was necessary for the template to exist. I have decided to nominate the template for deletion – your thoughts on the nomination would be appreciated. You can access the template's deletion discussion here. Thank you. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the AIV report on {{vandal|75.93.198.139}}. On the subject of number changing, this is something I see a lot when huggling. Do you have any advice or techniques for identifying number-changing vandalism and distinguishing it from legitimate edits? I often find plausible-looking number changing edits by IPs, such as changing the population of a city, and find myself wondering what is the best way to handle it. --causa sui (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

• In this case, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Taylor_Swift_%28album%29&action=historysubmit&diff=436042094&oldid=435931015 these two edits]. I knew they were wrong based on knowledge of the singer, but even if I didn't, the new quote wouldn't make any sense, and it's a big change. So the edit was definitely suspicious enough that I would recommend checking the reference, which is linked right there. If it wasn't hyperlinked, than checking the Taylor Swift article would be really easy. Changing a direct quote is automatically suspect. The vandal's other edits were mostly the release dates of past albums and birthdates, which again are automatically suspect, because those figures should never change. Populations and sales figures are a bit trickier than that, but common sense helps. Ridiculous numbers or big changes should stand out. Checking the citation or the rest of the article helps. If an uncited number gets changed from one thing to another, then it was never really verifiable in the first place, and you can add a {{Cite}} tag. For some things, like for me sports statistics, it's easiest to accept that you have no idea what the numbers mean, and defer to editors with more knowledge in the field. -LtNOWIS (talk) 23:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks for cleaning up the links on Naser Jason Abdo, It was instructive to go through the diffs. V7-sport (talk) 02:11, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

• Hey, it's my pleasure. Template:Cite news is definitely worth understanding for news-related articles, but fortunately it's pretty simple. -LtNOWIS (talk) 02:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Please see my post here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yaksar#Luther_Strange]. Thanks!Zigzig20s (talk) 20:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

• - Ellen Corbett

Hi - I made some removals after investigation. Please have a look at what I have left and let me know if you think it is now npov and not undue,thanks - Youreallycan (talk) 20:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you, I think it's a lot more balanced now. -LtNOWIS (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

• Hi again - there has been some more of a similar pattern of undue weight additions to the Ellen Corbett article. As you are more local would you have a look at the recent edit history of this BLP and let me know what you think, the article is now semi protected for a little while - regards - Youreallycan 20:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
• You made the right call in simply reverting those edits. SPAs using biography articles as political attack pages is pretty much a textbook case of POV-pushing, even it it wasn't a BLP article. The word choice in those edits was simply egregious, with the bill being "gutted" and taxpayers being "shocked." But I think the POV and sourcing issues were secondary to the fact that it was a clear case of WP:SYNTH. There's no source that connects Corbett with Solyndra, but the editor draws these separate threads together to create a narrative. That would be great for a blog or newspaper, but we don't do original research here. So yeah, you made the right call. Let me know if you ever need me to look at it again. -LtNOWIS (talk) 02:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
• Or rather, there is a source that indirectly connects Corbett with Solyndra, but the stuff about the one bill's language going into another bill is all OR. -LtNOWIS (talk) 02:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Operation Gladio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shortsword (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

• That was deliberate. "Shortsword" is an actual thing with a definition. -LtNOWIS (talk) 21:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amy Kremer. Since you had some involvement with the Amy Kremer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Travis Thurston+ 00:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for the notification, even if I have no memory of creating that redirect. -LtNOWIS (talk) 03:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts# Request for Comment: Pro wrestling. --Tenebrae (talk) 12:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

is jewish, as said by jewish law, cause her mother (named Goldsmith, a typical jewish name) is jewish. That's it what problem do you have with jews? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.3.25.92 (talk) 03:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

• Even though Carole Middleton's maiden name was Goldsmith, she was not Jewish. -LtNOWIS (talk) 00:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Radtke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

• I went ahead and gave this message to the person who actually expanded this redirect into an article. -LtNOWIS (talk) 08:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kerry Bentivolio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Mary’s College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, LtNOWIS,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Teodoro Lonfernini should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teodoro Lonfernini .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, MJH (talk) 03:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|style = notice

|small =

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 11 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clinton Romesha, which you created or substantially expanded. {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Clinton Romesha|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clinton Romesha.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Clinton Romesha|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Clinton Romesha.}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [http://stats.grok.se/en/201302/Clinton_Romesha quick check]) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

}} KTC (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mac Schneider, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Attorney and Prairie Public Broadcasting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Join us at the NLM next week, either in person or online, to learn about NLM resources, hear some great speakers, and do some editing!

File:Wiki med logo outline.svg]] On Tuesday, 28 May there will be a community Wikipedia meeting at the United States National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland - with a second on Thursday, 30 May for those who can't make it on Tuesday. You can participate either in-person, or via an online webinar. If you attend in person, USB sticks (but not external drives) are ok to use.

Please go to the event page to get more information, including a detailed program schedule.

If you are interested in participating, please register by sending an email to pmhmeet@gmail.com. Please indicate if you are coming in person or if you will be joining us via the webinar. After registering, you will receive additional information about how to get to our campus (if coming in-person) and details about how to join the webinar. Klortho (talk) 05:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the last-minute notice, but on Saturday, June 8, from 3 to 6 PM, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute are hosting a Legislative Data Meetup. We will discuss the work done so far by WikiProject U.S. Federal Government Legislative Data to put data from Congress onto Wikipedia, as well as what more needs to be done. If you have ideas you'd like to contribute, or if you're just curious and feel like meeting up with other Wikipedians, you are welcome to come! Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for D.C.-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Harej (talk) 04:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Please join [http://wikimediadc.org Wikimedia DC] for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, June 15 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill ^[talk] 19:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)