User talk:Mgoldenbarnes#top
{{Talk header}}
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Hannes Bieger|Hannes Bieger]] (February 10)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hannes Bieger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hannes Bieger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hannes_Bieger Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hannes_Bieger reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Mgoldenbarnes!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
Your thread has been archived
style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
valign="top"
| Hi Mgoldenbarnes! You created a thread called {{tq|Hannes Bieger Wiki page declined}} at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit§ion=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to Hannes Bieger Wiki page declined}} create a new thread]. Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC) |
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Hannes Bieger|Hannes Bieger]] (April 13)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hannes Bieger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hannes Bieger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hannes_Bieger Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utopes&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hannes_Bieger reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Nic Fanciulli|Nic Fanciulli]] (August 23)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Fails GNG, can be better sourced for review}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nic Fanciulli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nic Fanciulli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nic_Fanciulli Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aman.kumar.goel&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nic_Fanciulli reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 11:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
valign="top"
| Hi Mgoldenbarnes! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, {{tq|Wondering what else I can do to get my page accepted?}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Wondering what else I can do to get my page accepted?}}. The archival was done by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC) |
[[WP:AfC|AfC]] notification: [[Draft:Nic Fanciulli]] has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nic Fanciulli. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Nic Fanciulli]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Nic_Fanciulli help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
scope_creepTalk 15:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about [[Argy DJ]]
Hello Mgoldenbarnes, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Argy DJ, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argy DJ.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with
. And don't forget to sign your reply with
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
:{{Re|Bobby Cohn}} Hi there, as far as I know, he now has two Gold certifications for a track he made called 'Aria' (in France and Italy). Would that suffice to get the page approved?
:Thanks
Mgoldenbarnes (talk) 11:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
::Hi @Mgoldenbarnes, take a look at WP:MUSICBIO, for a certified gold achievement, we would ideally like to see it for the album not just the single. The deletion discussion also looked like someone listed some additional citations, so you can review those as well. Alternatively, if the track charted in France or Italy, that would work as well. Bobby Cohn (talk) 12:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Ok thanks, appreciate your feedback. :-) Mgoldenbarnes (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)