User talk:Noleander#Wikipedia:Arbitration.2FRequests.2FCase.2FNoleander closed

The article Margaret Sanger you nominated as a good article has failed File:Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Margaret Sanger for reasons why Talk:Margaret Sanger/GA2{{!}}the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Margaret Sanger/GA3{{!}}begun reviewing the article Margaret Sanger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Margaret Sanger you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Margaret Sanger for comments about the article, and Talk:Margaret Sanger/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Cscr-featured.svg

|imagesize=60px

|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;

|text = Congratulations, Noleander! The article you nominated, Margaret Sanger, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|FrB.TG}} via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

}}

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review South Sudan at the Olympics. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #31.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Silent Parade/GA2{{!}}begun reviewing the article Silent Parade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 18 May 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

{{User QAIbox

| image = Yellow roses, Johannisberg.jpg

| image_upright = 0.8

| bold = story · music · places

}}

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "Margaret Sanger is an important figure in United States history. From her beginnings as a nurse, a socialist, and a feminist, she evolved into a charismatic activist that worked to legalize birth-control. She founded Planned Parenthood, and was responsible for the gradual legalization of contraceptives in the U.S. between 1918 and 1965. To promote birth control, she endorsed eugenics, which has tarnished her reputation, because many eugenicists were racists. Six decades after her death, Sanger remains a highly visible figure in the U.S. because the anti-abortion movement frequently attacks Sanger on social media. The attacks focus on her support of eugenics and purported racism, so the article covers those areas in some depth."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:51, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of lynching victims in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Silent Parade you nominated as a good article has failed File:Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Silent Parade for reasons why Talk:Silent Parade/GA2{{!}}the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 23:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, based on your directions at The Featured Article Candidates, I have applied for Hindustani-speaking world to be peer-reviewed. Could you please go over the article and then leave a message at my talk page or on this thread below? Shubhsamant09 (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Shubhsamant09}} - Yes, I can do a peer review of that article. Noleander (talk) 22:47, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

::Hello, and thank you so much for peer reviewing the article. I went over the map, and instead created a new one with sources cited so its accuracy is not disputable. At the end of the page, I've added the topics like you mentioned and have simplified the citations without the quotes. Thank you once again. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:::@Shubhsamant09 Okay. I am about 1/3 of the way done with the peer review. I will look at your changes you recently made. I will let you know when I am done with the peer review. Noleander (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Hello, I went over your review thoroughly, ractified the article according, and have submitted the article for the GA category. Thank you once again for reviewing.

::::The GA review -

::::https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hindustani-speaking_world/GA1&action=edit&editintro=Template:GAN/editintro&preload=Template:GAN/preload Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{yo|Shubhsamant09}} Good luck with the GA process. Be patient: you have to wait for some volunteer to find your article at GA and pick it and start a review. That can take anywhere from 1 week to 3 months. Sometimes articles fail the GA, and you simply work on them more, then they pass the second try. So if you fail the first GA, do not give up hope.

:::::If you think the article is ready for GA, and you are in a hurry, you should consider listing the article in the "GA review circle" at WP:Good article review circles. If you list the article there, it will get reviewed within 10 days ... but you must also do a GA review on some article. I'm not saying that is a better option, but I thought you should know. Only list at WP:Good article review circles if you are positive that you can perform a decent GA review yourself on someone else's article. Noleander (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::Okay, thank you. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Sounder commuter rail. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #33. 750h+ 10:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Silent Parade/GA3{{!}}begun reviewing the article Silent Parade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Silent Parade you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Silent Parade for comments about the article, and Talk:Silent Parade/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review HNLMS Java (1921). At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #37. 750h+ 11:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Kitty Marion/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Kitty Marion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Star Manatee -- Star Manatee (talk) 13:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Kitty Marion you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Kitty Marion for comments about the article, and Talk:Kitty Marion/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Star Manatee -- Star Manatee (talk) 15:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Oogle Doodle commemorating 100th anniversary of the Silent Parade.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hi Noleander, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:42, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Can I suggest you have another look at this page you recently approved as to sourcing. Cite 1 is incomplete so as to be meaningless, cite 2 is good but almost the whole article is a copyvio of it, cite 3 as you pointed out is not a RS and cite 4 is a flickr photo Lyndaship (talk) 08:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Lyndaship Thanks for the feedback on the WP:New_pages_patrol review I did. I believe my actions were consistent with the instructions at WP:New_pages_patrol ...there are circumstances where an article can be marked "Reviewed" even though the reviewer adds tags that indicate bad sources. (PS: the term is "reviewed", not "approved"). If you think the article need more tags, or should be sent to WP:AFD, or should be un-reviewed, please feel free to go for it. Maybe you should contact user Woffio, they created the article, and they also removed the "bad sources" tag I added (without fixing the sources issue). Noleander (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Soliloquy. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #41.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Negro problem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junius.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Atlanta Compromise/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Atlanta Compromise you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Governor Sheng -- Governor Sheng (talk) 12:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

@Noleander hello - can i ask you to review List of companies involved in the Gaza genocide Thanks a bunch Cinaroot (talk) 20:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Cinaroot - The list article appears to comply with the WP:MOS manual of style. Most facts and sentences have good citations that point to sources, which is very important to meet the WP:V and WP:RS requirements. I have not looked at the individual sources, but WP:Reliable sources policy suggests that independent (not biased) sources are desired; it is best to use major, independent news outlets, such as The Guardian news site; New York Times, Mother Jones, BBC and so on.

:One requirement for WP articles or lists is the WP:SYNTH requirement, which prohibits "synthesis" ... that means an editor should not take a bunch of facts (even if they are all true and all have strong sources) and assemble them together into a single article or list ... Unless there is a source that has published a similar list.

:Whether or not this particular list of companies complies with the WP:SYNTH policy is hard to say. The best way to comply with the policy is to find a "list of companies involved in Gaza...." article that was published by some strong, independent source (like the The Guardian etc). This article does not have to copy that list exactly: the important thing is that sources have published some kind of list of companies.

:If you cannot find a published list of companies, that is not necessarily mean the list is invalid: there are hundreds of lists in Wikipedia that are assembled by editors, even tho there are no sources that publish similar lists. In that case: if an editor nominates the list for deletion (using the WP:AFD process) you'll need to justify the list... for example, by finding similar WP lists of companies that were involved in wars, conflicts etc. You can look in :Category:Lists of companies and try to find similar lists. Then in the AFD process, other editors will contribute their opinions. Noleander (talk) 21:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

::What about https://afsc.org/gaza-genocide-companies

::This is by American Friends Service Committee Cinaroot (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

:::I can also find supporting articles like https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/gaza-war-profiteers-corporations/ Cinaroot (talk) 21:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

::::@Cinaroot The reliability (per WP:RS) of sources will not be black-and-white: sources will cover a broad spectrum: from very biased propaganda sources, to middle-reliability (Amnesty International, etc), to very objective (BBC, New York Times, etc).

::::WP has a list of some common sources that indicates if they are okay or not at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources ... but it only has a few dozen source listed. You should glance at that and you will learn a lot about how to tell if sources are reliable or not.

::::You posted a source above from [https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/gaza-war-profiteers-corporations/ The Nation] ... that magazine is very solid & reliable. The source from American Friends Service Committee is probably middle-reliability (not great, but not too biased) ... but I'm not sure.

::::I did a quick google search for weapons companies involved in Gaza. There are a lot of sources that might be perceived as biased, but an example of a reliable source is: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute which published this: https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2024/how-top-arms-exporters-have-responded-war-gaza

::::If you can find three or more sources that are reliable, and that published an article about "list of companies involved ..." that would be good proof that the list article complies with WP:SYNTH requirement.

::::Again, even if you cannot find published lists, the article may still meet the WP:SYNTH and WP:OR policies, but you may be required to argue the case in the WP:AFD process. Noleander (talk) 21:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

I think there are more news sources. If i add them can the deletion be raised? Grffffff (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 18 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Silent Parade, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1917 more than 8,000 African Americans protested lynchings by marching down New York City's Fifth Avenue in silence, accompanied only by the sound of muffled drums? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silent Parade. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-05-08&end=2025-05-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Silent_Parade Silent Parade]), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} —Kusma (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks! I saw your article on Veiqia on the front page a few days ago, it looked nice there! Noleander (talk) 08:48, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I understand your doubts but you forgot to mention that was a hull loss which automatically increases notability. The problem lies with the article's quality, not it's existence. I hope you'll understand and have a nice day Private User Edgeworth (talk) 06:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)