User talk:History6042

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Central Powers/GA2{{!}}begun reviewing the article Central Powers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BarntToust -- BarntToust (talk) 14:05, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

The article Central Powers you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Central Powers for comments about the article, and Talk:Central Powers/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BarntToust -- BarntToust (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

The article Cook Islands at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cook Islands at the 2024 Summer Olympics and Talk:Cook Islands at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ReturnDuane -- ReturnDuane (talk) 14:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Cook Islands at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Cook Islands at the 2024 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:Cook Islands at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ReturnDuane -- ReturnDuane (talk) 11:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

The article South Sudan at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South Sudan at the 2024 Summer Olympics and Talk:South Sudan at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

The article South Sudan at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:South Sudan at the 2024 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:South Sudan at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 16:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Not a huge deal, just FYI the closing template goes above the header. If you put it below it causes weird errors in the day's AFD log. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 21:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 02:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

The article South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics and Talk:South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 03:21, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

The article South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:South Sudan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 21:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi History6042, thanks again for participating in the Cup. Unfortunately, I just received a complaint indicating that you were performing subpar reviews in order to claim FAC, FLC, or GAN points—specifically, that you were submitting reviews with exactly five pieces of feedback. For example, in Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Sakurai Prize/archive1, you suggested four minor grammatical changes; the fifth suggestion, which recommended swapping out an image, was the only substantial feedback in the review.

I know that I told you that we were not going to accept submissions with less feedback than that, but if you are doing superficial reviews with the bare minimum of feedback, that can be considered WP:GAMING. My concern is that, if you are not conducting a full review of the FAC, FLC, or GAN to the best of your ability, it lowers the quality of the reviews. As Lee said above, the goal of the WikiCup is to improve the encyclopedia and not to claim points; as such, overly short reviews don't help nominators whose FACs, FLCs, and GANs actually have substantial issues.

As such, I encourage you to go over your recent reviews. If the nomination is still open, I encourage you to either add more substantial feedback, or if that's not possible, write a paragraph explaining how the article or list meets the respective criteria. Otherwise, we may have to unfortunately reject some of your recent review submissions. I'm also going to ping my co-judges—@Cwmhiraeth, @Frostly, @Lee Vilenski and @Guerillero—so that they are aware. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:57, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:Okay, @Epicgenius, I do not have time to fix them today, but if you could provide me with a list of the reviews with issues I can fix most/all of them tomorrow morning. Also, I did not know that grammatical changes didn't count, sorry about that, I will stop counting them from now on. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

::@History6042, I did not mean to say that grammatical changes don't count; on the contrary, if you proposed 10 or 20 grammatical changes, these may amount to a substantive review in themselves. I meant to say that they may count less than content-related comments. Five substantial comments is the bare minimum for a review, but even these may not count for points if the only things you're suggesting are minor grammatical comments. – Epicgenius (talk) 04:27, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Okay, so I will assume that grammatical changes count as 1/3 of a review. Also, do you know which specific reviews are subpar? If so please tell me. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

::::Forgot to ping @Epicgenius. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::I will check again tomorrow and let you know. The specific complaint I received mentioned Sakurai Prize. However, I suggest that you look at all the reviews you performed over the last 2-3 weeks and see if there is any feedback you can add. We aren't looking for you to make a certain number of comments - so you don't need to make 15 grammatical comments - but we do need you to review the entire article to the best of your ability. Epicgenius (talk) 13:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|1=On 18 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Michael O'Sullivan (jockey), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

|2={{Ambox globe current red}}

|imagesize=50px

}}

Hi @History6042,

I hope you are fine and healthy? Please I am inviting to the FLR of Soyinka’s work. Please help when you are less busy. Thank you for considering. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

:@SafariScribe, hi, I will review the article soon when I have time. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:02, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

When using the new Michelin key template, is there a way for it to only show the relevant ratings for the specific page? When using the key it shows all 3 ratings but in some pages only 1 star or 1 and 2 star ratings are applicable. Expandinglight5 (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

:I asked that question on the talk page to see if anyone else knew. I don't sorry. @Expandinglight5. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

::If that's the case, we shouldn't use the template as the legend/key if not all three ratings are included in the list. Expandinglight5 (talk) 01:04, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Cscr-featured.svg

|imagesize=60px

|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;

|text = Congratulations, History6042! The list you nominated, List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Toronto, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Hey man im josh}} via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

}}

:Congrats! I hope you will consider working on other Michelin lists. Thanks and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

::I will, I have already got another FLC up. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:58, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

{{reftalk}}

{{ivmbox

|1=On 26 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article William Browder (mathematician), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 22:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

|2={{Ambox globe current red}}

|imagesize=50px

}}

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Gog the Mild}} with 1,168 round points, mainly from 4 featured articles and 4 good articles on old military history, in addition to an assortment of GA and FA reviews.
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Generalissima}} with 1,095 round points, mainly from 2 FAs, 2 featured lists, 8 GAs, and 16 Did You Know articles mainly on historical topics.
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}}, with 866 round points from 20 GAs, 23 DYKs, and 2 In the News articles primarily about athletes.
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Sammi Brie}}, with 846 round points from 16 GAs about radio and TV stations, 45 GA reviews, and 3 DYKs.
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Hey man im josh}}, with 816 round points from 5 FLs about sports and Olympic topics, 46 FL reviews, 3 ITN articles, and a large number of bonus points.
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|MaranoFan}}, with 815 round points primarily from 3 FAs and 1 GA about music, in addition to 9 article reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

The article Riggie Dwyer you nominated as a good article has failed File:Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Riggie Dwyer for reasons why Talk:Riggie Dwyer/GA1{{!}}the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Cscr-featured.svg

|imagesize=60px

|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;

|text = Congratulations, History6042! The list you nominated, List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Turkey, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|PresN}} via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

}}

:Great work! Congrats ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:56, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:00, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Tiny Croft/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Tiny Croft you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 21:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

The article Tiny Croft you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Tiny Croft for comments about the article, and Talk:Tiny Croft/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|1=On 10 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jozef Markuš, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

|2={{Ambox globe current red}}

|imagesize=50px

}}

{{ivmbox

|image = Cscr-featured.svg

|imagesize=60px

|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;

|text = Congratulations, History6042! The list you nominated, List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Dubai, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Hey man im josh}} via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

}}

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:South Sudan at the Olympics/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article South Sudan at the Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Noleander -- Noleander (talk) 07:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

The article South Sudan at the Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:South Sudan at the Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:South Sudan at the Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Noleander -- Noleander (talk) 01:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Milan Marjanović. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #32. 750h+ 01:51, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Bhutan at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Bhutan at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Bhutan at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Bhutan at the 2024 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:Bhutan at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Sudan National Olympic Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review 1990 United States Senate election in Delaware. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #33. 750h+ 10:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Cscr-featured.svg

|imagesize=60px

|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;

|text = Congratulations, History6042! The list you nominated, List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Moscow, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Hey man im josh}} via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

}}

{{ivmbox

|image = Cscr-featured.svg

|imagesize=60px

|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;

|text = Congratulations, History6042! The list you nominated, List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Vancouver, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Hey man im josh}} via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

}}

:Nice work! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 01:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics and Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 04:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|1=On 10 April 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Grand National, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

|2={{Ambox globe current red}}

|imagesize=50px

}}

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review In the Black. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #34. 750h+ 12:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:South Sudan National Olympic Committee/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article South Sudan National Olympic Committee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 13:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has failed File:Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics for reasons why Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1{{!}}the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

The article South Sudan National Olympic Committee you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:South Sudan National Olympic Committee for comments about the article, and Talk:South Sudan National Olympic Committee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from {{User0|Nettrom}}, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you! History6042😊 (Contact me) 10:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Jordyn Wieber. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #36.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 06:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Kosovo at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Kosovo at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 03:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Kitty Marion. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #37. 750h+ 11:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Kosovo at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Kosovo at the 2024 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:Kosovo at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 13:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. FYI: You were assigned to review my article within GA review circle #37. Someone jumped in a few hours ago and did a review on my article, so I guess you are off the hook: Talk:Kitty_Marion/GA1. They spent a lot of time on the review and looks like a really thorough review. So, I'm going to start fixing the issues they raised and just go with it. Thanks anyway for volunteering to do the review. Noleander (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, @Noleander, sorry about not being able to get to your review on time. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA2{{!}}begun reviewing the article Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 13:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics and Talk:Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 22:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Palau at the 2024 Summer Olympics. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #39.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 11:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hey, are you okay if I review Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics at the GAN circle? – Reidgreg (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

::Yes @Reidgreg. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:Mauritania at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 21:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics and Talk:Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:Bhutan at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 21:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics for comments about the article, and Talk:Bhutan at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)