User talk:Paalappoo

{{Tb|Tinucherian|Category:Latur Division geography stubs}}

-- Tinu Cherian - 13:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svgAn editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Thuravoor, Angamaly. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thuravoor, Angamaly. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

As of now, this is the only legal information I could get. I do not find anything, any legal reference, related to Latur Division bcoz, it is more over clear that if the division has to be made, it will be Nanded only, whereas Latur being the second sub-division in Aurangabad division after Nanded. I am not sure, but may be, since last 8-9 yrs we have Maharashtra CM from this area, people would have had a thought of putting Latur's name as a separate division, but the reference I provided is a legal reference and it shows Nanded. MarathiJain (talk) 01:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Help! ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

:Are you a reliable source? ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Notable? And what about Marimallappa? I hope all is well there. Party on. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

:Sorry, no idea about both. Maybe User:Salih can help with Joy J. Kaimaparamban. I have left a word in his talk page. Paalappoo (talk) 05:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

::Okay. No problem. Thanks for having a look. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Which pics? Sorry for the slow response. I've been distracted. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

:::Had posted pics of lavanga latika, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Labanga_001.JPG], [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Labanga_002.JPG], [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Labanga_003.JPG], [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Labanga_004.JPG] and [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Labanga_005.JPG]. Was wondering if it qualifies to be a doughnut... Dont ask me anything more about it. All I know is that it is tasty... :) Paalappoo (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Bacon materializer.jpg

Unable to resist bacon's temptations, rogue editors have kicked off the Bacon Challenge 2010 before the New Year even starts! This is a fun and collegial event and all are welcome. There are many non-pork articles for editors who enjoy some sizzle, but object to or don't like messing with pig products. This year's event also includes a Bacon WikiCup 2010 for those who may want to keep score and enjoy engaging in friendly competition. Given the critical importance of this subject matter, I know you will want to participate, so remember to sign up today and get started A.S.A.P. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I really want to categories the pages under this template to Category:Kolhapur district geography stubs. You have put up these templates along with Satara Sangli Pune Solapur under Pune Division geography stubs. Please help to putup the pages under these templates under the respective district geography stubs category rather than the division geography stubs. Please help!

Shivap (talk) 12:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

:Stubs are already classified division-wise. Is there the need to further classify district-wise? If you want to do that, you will have to remove the existing templates and re-classify all the stubs district-wise. That will involve creating stub templates and categories for all districts. I feel division-wise categorizations will suffice. As it is, the number of stub pages per division is not that high. Paalappoo (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. Grutness...wha? 23:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

:PS - most of the problem is with the category, which it seems you weren't happy with either. Grutness...wha? 23:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

::{{tl|Latur-geo-stub}} is ok, I feel. It is :Category:Latur Division geography stubs that I have a problem with, as Latur division does not exist. Paalappoo (talk) 04:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

:::I though that was the case from your edits dealing with the template. It looks to me like there is one editor who is trying to push the idea of a Latur division for some reason, and he made the category. Grutness...wha? 05:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

::::I reverted the edits which categorized the template as :Category:Latur Division geography stubs. Yes, there is one editor who is pushing Latur division. Latur division page was created twice, I suppose, and subsequently deleted. The divisions can be verified in Divisions of Maharashtra. Paalappoo (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The next time you go through geography articles for tagging, can you check recent ones added to Madhya Pradesh. There are a few users from Khurai who go on creating nonsensical articles categorized into lots of MP categories. I've marked a few for deletion, but if you find some, please tag them for deletion or let me know and I'll take care of them. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 05:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

:Thanks, apparently there are many users, I know of four, from that region who are going on with this, so it's difficult to search for articles unless you actually go category sweeping. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 20:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks! :) Paalappoo (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Notable? ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

:He's a Sri Lankan Tamil from the UK (like M.I.A., so unlikely that most Indians would know about him or he'd have been covered in the Indian media (based on what's in the article now). cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 23:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

::I see. I saw that he was Tamil (Tamilian?) but I didn't notice that he is Sri Lankan or in the U.K. Thank you for the clarification. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Would you like to help out with this? There are lots of Kerala politicians and actors in the list and your expertise in that area would help. cheers. –SpacemanSpiff 19:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 45%; border:1px solid #cedff2; background-color:#f5faff; vertical-align:top"|

|-

!

|-

|style="color:#000"|

|}

|}

|}

This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 02:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Greetings! Two or more stub types which you created have been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. Grutness...wha? 12:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Bacon donut.jpg? :)]]

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Bacon has been created, and you are cordially invited to join, and list yourself as a participant at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bacon#Participants!
• You may also feel free to add the userbox - {{tl|User Bacon}} - to your userpage, to indicate your participation in the WikiProject.
• The Wikipedia:Bacon WikiCup is also ongoing, more info about that at User:SuperHamster/Bacon Challenge 2011, and User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 08:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 45%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background-color:#f5fffa; vertical-align:top;color:#000"|

|}

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 45%; border:1px solid #cedff2; background-color:#f5faff; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

JCbot (talk) 01:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

JCbot (talk) 01:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature.

This applies to several of the subcategories added under {{cl|Gujarat geography stubs}}. Many of these are undersized. I've proposed keeping the templates, but deleting the categories. Please discuss on the project page. Dawynn (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

==Invite to WikiConference India 2011 ==

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide.

Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

{{User0|ssriram_mt}} & {{User0|AshLin}} (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bot_requests&oldid=481419438#Message_to_take_part_in_Assessment_Drive request] on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Amanakkanthondi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:not notable orphaned article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravi_{My Tea Kadai} 05:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Ammbappur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:not notable orphaned article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravi_{My Tea Kadai} 05:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Ammenabath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:not notable orphaned article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravi_{My Tea Kadai} 05:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Anaikudam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:not notable orphaned article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravi_{My Tea Kadai} 05:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Anandavadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:not notable orphaned article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravi_{My Tea Kadai} 05:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{tlx|infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY

Nbound (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Highway 17A (India)(old Numbering) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. naveenpf (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Edaayankurichi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article uses only one source and the topic of the article isn’t notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycoMa (talk) 15:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Tadubi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 18:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Mehsi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I think this article should be deleted as it is seemingly not much significant or popular to have it's own wikipedia page, no way to verify claims and include a lot of original research. majorly rely on just this [https://www.india9.com/i9show/Mehsi-74380.htm] and [https://eastchamparan.nic.in/mehsi-button-industry/] as primary source. No third party sources are available. Other sources in the article do not have any connection, which i am looking forward to remove. Most of edits on this article are either vandal attacks or the edits reverting those. I think this article should either be improved or just deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RamaKrishnaHare (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Joshipura (surname) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:NNAME, no sources. Anjan Joshipura is not notable. I don't see redirecting to be a viable WP:ATD due to the parenthetical disambiguator.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Kalikave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources. Run of the mill farm next to an open pit mine. Not enough information to merge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Inai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No relevant and reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Not named on Open Source map. Apparently very small village. Not enough information to merge. Willing to redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Chittar, Tamil Nadu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)