User talk:Treeenthusiast#top

Welcome!

Hello, Treeenthusiast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or {{edit|Special:MyTalk|click here|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}} to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 06:15, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=675096255 your edit] to Gunnera may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Gunnera|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

  • the largest species, with leaves typically 1.5 to 2.0 meters (5 to 6 feet) long {{red|(}}not including the thick, succulent leaf stalk (petiole) of up to 2.5 meters (8&

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:15, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

[[Largest fungal fruit bodies]]

Hi Treeenthusiast; thanks for your efforts with this article. Just so you're not alarmed when you next take a look, I've made a number of changes to try and bring it more in-line with what is expected of a Wikipedia article of this sort, and asked the members of the fungi WikiProject (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fungi) if they'd like to have a look. It's potentially a really valuable article. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of world's longest vines

Hello Treeenthusiast,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged :List of world's longest vines for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:List of world's longest vines}}&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Chase (talk) 05:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

List of world's longest vines

Hi Treeenthusiast, thanks for your work of List of world's longest vines. I just wanted to give you a quick tip; if you make additions to the table there needs to be a |} at the end to close the table (See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_world%27s_longest_vines&type=revision&diff=725843314&oldid=725839873 this diff as an example]). You might also want to put a sentence or two at the start, before the table, as an introduction to the article. If you need any help or have any questions just let me know. Sarahj2107 (talk) 06:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

:{{tps}} If you edit a table, I strongly recommend using wp:show preview to verify that something hasn't been broken (which I always seem to do). Often one sees other text and tables "glommed" together. Thank you! Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

References

Would you please use {{tlx|cite book}} (with ISBN) or {{tlx|cite web}}? Please avoid wp:bare urls wp:citing sources and links to a few primers at the top. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Treeenthusiast. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Treeenthusiast. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

[[Draft:Posoqueria longiflora|Posoqueria longiflora]] moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Posoqueria longiflora, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

  • Article has no categories
  • Article has insufficient references
  • Article has no infobox
  • Article needs more botannical information Whiteguru (talk) 21:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Oxyanthus tubiflorus]] has been accepted

File:AFC-Logo.svg Oxyanthus tubiflorus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Oxyanthus_tubiflorus help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AryKun (talk) 07:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Treeenthusiast

Thank you for creating Anthocleista talbotii.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Hi, Nice start to the article. I've added a species box, categories and another reference. This species is a synonym of Anthocleista vogelii, which is the currently accepted name according to the reference I added. I will move the page in the nearish future and leave this page as a redirect. Is this OK with you or am I missing something?}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Hughesdarren}}}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|~~~~}} .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

  • I moved the page before I saw this note. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 01:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

species that have been renamed

Sometimes species are given new names as scientists find more appropriate categories for them or decide that one species is the same as another one. Draft:Posoqueria longiflora is an old name that has been replaced by Oxyceros longiflorus (Lam.) T.Yamaz., 1970. You could edit the existing Draft:Posoqueria longiflora and move it to the correct name. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 01:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

:@Eastmain This move was incorrect. The original article created by Treeenthusiast was about the species Posoqueria longiflora {{small|Aubl.}} ([https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:761025-1 POWO]), which is a valid name. The taxon Posoqueria longiflora {{small|(Lam.) Roxb.}} ([https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:761027-1 POWO]) is an entirely different plant on a different continent, and this is the one that is a synonym of Oxyceros longiflorus {{small|(Lam.) T.Yamaz.}} I have now edited the article and moved it back to Posoqueria longiflora, and created a new article for Oxyceros longiflorus, as well as fixing content in Wikidata and other links to the article. In the future, please ensure that you have the full information before making critical moves like this. Cheers, Steve Junglenut ☼ Talk 22:32, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

''[[Eucalyptus rhodantha]]''

Hello Treeenthusiast,

Thanks for your work. Wondering if you have a reference for "[t]hese stamens can number as many as 1700 in one flower" for Eucalyptus rhodantha. I can't find it in the references cited. Feel free to replace the sentence if I have made a mistake. Gderrin (talk) 08:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

:Sorry, but the "reference" you have added is not a reference. We need to know from where this information was obtained. Please feel free to describe here or on my talk page, where you read this information. Provided that your source is a reliable source, I would be happy to add it to the article or to help you do that. The name of the book, its author and the page number would be great. Gderrin (talk) 22:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Treeenthusiast

Thank you for creating Ficus salomonensis.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Nice work, I added an infobox and a reference, hope you approve. Best Regards}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Hughesdarren}}}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|~~~~}} .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 04:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Chisocheton lasiocarpus]] has been accepted

File:AFC-Logo.svg Chisocheton lasiocarpus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Chisocheton_lasiocarpus help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

[[Semecarpus magnificum]]

Hi. I have proposed this article for deletion. Is it possible you mean Adding Semecarpus magnificus? YorkshireExpat (talk) 07:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

:My original source spelled it as "magnificum" You will find these spelling disagreements everywhere in botany. It is a pity I did not copy down all of the information at the time, as I also have had a problem finding the original on line. All I can add is that it was published by the Department of Forests of the (then) territory of Papua New Guinea, and the locality was Port Morseby. I garnered this info circa 1985, probably from the UCLA bio-med library. Treeenthusiast (talk) 23:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pandanus obeliscus

Hello, Treeenthusiast,

Thank you for creating Pandanus obeliscus.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

{{Quote|1=Please add proper sources. See WP:CS for assistance.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rsjaffe}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Treeenthusiast. Thank you for creating Persea kadooriei. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Hello, Thanks for creating the article but this plant looks to be a synonym of Machilus wangchiana and will be moved there instead. There are some notes on the current articles talk page you may want to take a look at. Best Regards.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Hughesdarren}}}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|~~~~}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

:The article has now been moved to Machilus wangchiana, the discussion can be found on the talk page there. Thanks for your contributions. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 08:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

[[Draft:Salpichlaena volubilis|Salpichlaena volubilis]] moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Salpichlaena volubilis. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It doesn't meet WP:STUB and needs too be built upon prior to namespace implementation.

Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - GA Melbourne (talk) 07:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

[[Draft:Musa truncata|Musa truncata]] moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Musa truncata, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Pentagonia gomez-lauritoi. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Hi, Nice job on the article, added a taxobox. According to POWO the species was described in 2015 so I changed that category. Regards.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Hughesdarren}}}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|~~~~}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 05:26, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on [[Cariniana estrellensis]]

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Cariniana estrellensis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cariniana_estrellensis&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1153526385%7CCariniana%20estrellensis%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on [[Lepanthes oscarrodrigoi]]

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Lepanthes oscarrodrigoi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lepanthes_oscarrodrigoi&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1154671307%7CLepanthes%20oscarrodrigoi%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)§ion=new report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Equisetum giganteum

Hi there! You recently added a reference to the Equisetum giganteum article with an incorrect URL. Could you please fix this issue? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on [[Strobilanthes]]

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Strobilanthes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strobilanthes&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1163889601%7CStrobilanthes%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)§ion=new report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Sarcopus aberens. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Can't find any mention of this species on Kew POWO or using a google search. Is it spelled correctly?}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Hughesdarren}}}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|~~~~}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 03:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding [[Draft:Musa truncata]]

File:Information.svg Hello, Treeenthusiast. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Musa truncata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

[[Draft:Pandanus atrocarpus|Pandanus atrocarpus]] moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pandanus atrocarpus. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and the single source quoted is misspelled and has no verifiability (ISBN/link). Article formatting is also an issue - is has no taxonomy, categories, reference tag, infobox or other content..

Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, [[Draft:Musa truncata]]

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Treeenthusiast. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Musa truncata".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AMusa+truncata request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on [[List of world records held by plants]]

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :List of world records held by plants, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_world_records_held_by_plants&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1175720005%7CList%20of%20world%20records%20held%20by%20plants%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Treeenthusiast§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:List of world records held by plants}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1175720005 report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding [[Draft:Pandanus atrocarpus]]

File:Information.svg Hello, Treeenthusiast. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pandanus atrocarpus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, [[Draft:Pandanus atrocarpus]]

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Treeenthusiast. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pandanus atrocarpus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3APandanus+atrocarpus request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Alocasia robusta

Hi, I reverted your edit on Alocasia robusta because neither of the supplied URLs were working and the whole thing seemed kind of malformed. Were you copying that edit from somewhere else? -- D'n'B-t -- 05:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

File:Information.svg Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to :Largest fungal fruit bodies, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 04:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Amorphophallus pusillus]] has been accepted

File:AFC-Logo.svg Amorphophallus pusillus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Amorphophallus_pusillus help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Holmsia parva. Another editor, Hughesdarren, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Unable to find any mention of this species or Genus holmsia in the kew garden website (https://powo.science.kew.org/) or world flora online (https://wfoplantlist.org/) database. Is the spelling correct?}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Hughesdarren}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 04:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

:{{re|Hughsdarren}} Sorry Hughsdarren. I misspelled it. Should have been 'Holmesia" but it has been reclassified. I don't have the name in front of me, but something like 'Angraecops' Treeenthusiast (talk) 05:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

The categories/stub template for the articles you're creating

FYI, it would be easier for the reviewers if you added the categories/stub template yourself. The two that I've reviewed, both qualified to be in the :Category:Orchids of Tanzania category and {{tl|orchid-stub}} template. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 04:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join the WikiProject Plants Stub-to-Start Drive

{{tmbox

|image = none

|style = background-color: white; border: 2pm solid green;

|text = Hello {{PAGENAME}}! I would like to invite you to join the WikiProject Plants Stub-to-Start Drive where we focus efforts on upgrading Stub-class plant species articles to Start-class. The instructions are straightforward and located on the page for the drive. If you wish to participate, you can join on the sign-up page, or feel free to ask for assistance on the talk page any time. Thank you for your contributions and for your interest in plant articles on Wikipedia! Fritzmann (message me) 22:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

}}

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Passiflora speciosa. Another editor, Hughesdarren, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=I have moved this article to the correct spelling of passiflora}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Hughesdarren}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Ficus caulocarpa. Another editor, Cremastra, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=In future, please make sure taxon article you write have a {{tl|speciesbox}} and {{tl|taxonbar}}.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Cremastra}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cremastra (uc) 22:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Monophyllaea horsfieldii. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for creating the article! I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|SunDawn}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

The stub pages you create

Very frequently you create stubs that have many errors and create lots of work for other editors. For example you created Canavalia kauensis without checking to see if the species was still accepted and this resulted in two moves. I strongly urge you to check [https://powo.science.kew.org/ Plants of the World Online] before you create a page about a flowering plant. In addition in this case you cited two sources and managed to misspell the first author's name on one, leave off the other authors entirely, left out most of the article's title, and cited the wrong page number. This made it much harder to track down. This is a frequent problem with your citations. If you can find a DOI number and use the create citation tool it would avoid many of these problems when citing a journal. Similarly when citing a book using the ISBN number can create a very reasonable citation in more than half of cases. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Dracontium gigas]]

Hello, Treeenthusiast

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheTechie, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Dracontium gigas, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Dracontium gigas}}&action=edit Edit the page]
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the {{Clickable button|Publish changes|color=blue|link=no}} button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechie}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 21:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Hypoxida]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Hypoxida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypoxida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

[[Draft:Anthurium salvinii|Anthurium salvinii]] moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anthurium salvinii. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Royiswariii Talk! 06:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Neomirandea angularis. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this stub for a species. You might want to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Template to see the recommended structure for such pages; remember also that when adding categories, it's best to check that they exist so that its easier for readers to find your content.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Klbrain}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Anthurium salvinii]] has been accepted

File:AFC-Logo.svg Anthurium salvinii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Anthurium_salvinii help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Citations

I've noticed some problems with your citations. As an example, in the most recent one I noticed you got the title of the book somewhat wrong by combining two words into one, replaced the periods after the initials of the first author's name with ">", and purposefully combined two separate authors into one. I've noticed similar mistakes in many of the edits you make. If, as I suspect from the types of errors you make, you are having trouble typing, I suggest using the reference wizard to make citing books easier. Putting in the ISBN from your edit on Robinia hispida into the Book citation (RefToolbar) accessible from the "Templates" pull down menu on the top left of an editing window would have produced this:

{{cite book |last1=Allen |first1=O. N. |last2=Allen |first2=Ethel Kullmann |title=The Leguminosae, a source book of characteristics, uses, and nodulation |date=1981 |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |location=Madison, Wisc |isbn=0-299-08400-0 |page=22}}

Instead you produced this:

{{cite book | last= Allen | first= O>N> and Ethel K. | date= 1981 |title= The Leguminosae - A Sourcebook of Characteristics, Uses and Nodulation | location= Madison, Wisconsin | publisher= Univ. of Wisc. Press | page= 22 |ISBN= 0-299-08400-0 }}

If you do not like the fact that the Book citation (RefToolbar) pulls information that often does not capitalize book titles quite correctly, that is still an easy fix either in the boxes of the RefToolbar or after inserting the new ref. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 04:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

[[Draft:Hibiscus cisplatinus|Hibiscus cisplatinus]] moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hibiscus cisplatinus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and not clear that this is an accepted species - see https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:328182-2#children.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:List of longest vines]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :List of longest vines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest vines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🌿MtBotany (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Species articles

When you create species articles, please include a {{tl|speciesbox}} (with an image if one is available) and a {{tl|taxonbar}}. Thanks. Cremastra talk 00:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Oxalis rusciformis]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Oxalis rusciformis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxalis rusciformis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

William Avery (talk) 10:57, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Treeenthusiast. Thank you for your work on Xylopodium. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this short article, although it's little more than a dictionary definition. A few more sources would be great!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Klbrain}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

"loc. cit."

Please note that this is something that should never be used here. It's a relic of printed material. In electronic encyclopedias, we have other ways of showing a reference is being used in multiple places. Please look at where you've used it and how it's been replaced. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2025 (UTC)