Vickers Vanguard#Cargo operations

{{short description|British medium-range airliner with 4 turboprop engines, 1959}}

{{for|the 1920s biplane airliner|Vickers Type 170 Vanguard}}

{{Use British English|date=September 2017}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2017}}

{{Infobox aircraft

|name = Vanguard

|image = File:Invicta International Airlines Vickers 952 Vanguard.jpg

|caption = A Vickers Vanguard of Invicta International Airlines. This aircraft was involved in the Flight 435 crash.

|type = Airliner

|manufacturer = Vickers-Armstrongs

|designer =

|national_origin=United Kingdom

|first_flight = 20 January 1959

|introduction = 17 December 1960 (by British European Airways)

|retired = 17 October 1996

|status =

|primary_user = British European Airways

|more_users = Trans-Canada Air Lines

|produced =

|number_built = 44

|developed_from = Vickers Viscount

|variants =

}}

The Vickers Vanguard was a short/medium-range turboprop airliner designed and produced by the British aircraft manufacturer Vickers-Armstrongs.

The Vanguard was developed during the mid-to-late 1950s in response to a specification issued by British European Airways (BEA) for a 100-seat airliner; Vickers decided to design such an airliner as a follow-up to the existing Viscount series, the principal difference from which being an expanded airframe that provided considerably more internal volume. Another key innovation was the Tyne engine, which was roughly twice as powerful as the Viscount's Rolls-Royce Dart engine, and allowed for increases in both cruising speed and altitude. Throughout the design process, the needs of two airlines, BEA and Trans-Canada Air Lines (TCA), heavily shaped the Vanguard's specifics.

The Vanguard was brought into revenue service on 17 December 1960, around the same time as the commercial availability of a new generation of jet-powered airliners; as a result, these competitors quickly overshadowed its performance and led to the type being largely ignored by the market. Only 44 aircraft were ever built, the type having been ordered by BEA and TCA. After only about ten years' service, TCA experimentally converted one of its Vanguards to a freighter configuration, calling it the Cargoliner. Considered to be a success, the majority of Vanguards were converted into freighters during the early 1970s, those from BEA becoming the Merchantman. As a freighter, the type remained in service for many years, the final example being retired in 1996.

Development

=Background=

The origins of the Vanguard can be traced back to speculative discussions between Vickers and the airline British European Airways (BEA) conducted as early as 1953, the same year in which the commercially successful Vickers Viscount airliner first entered revenue service. Even at this early stage, the two firms had envisioned the introduction of a successor to the Viscount entering service around 1959. This envisioned successor airliner would possess economics 10 per cent greater{{clarify|date=November 2023}} than those of the Viscount, while also being considerably faster throughout all operational stages. Out of BEA's internal analysis of various options, which studied both turboprop and pure jet propulsion arrangements, it became clear that a larger aircraft that could accommodate bigger payloads was highly desirable.Andrews 1969, p. 451.

On 19 April 1953, BEA's chief executive, Peter Masefield, outlined the company's requirements in a letter to Vickers; these criteria included a cruise speed of {{convert|370|kn|mph kph}}, a standard range of {{convert|1000|mi|km}}, with {{convert|305|mi|km|sigfig=2}} in reserve fuel, the ability to accommodate up to 100 passengers, and an explicit preference for a high-wing configuration. Coincidentally, another airline, Trans-Canada Air Lines (TCA), also made contact with the manufacturer with its own list of requirements, calling for a Viscount-like airliner capable of servicing its transcontinental routes while carrying up to 60 passengers. Recognising the potential to fulfil both airlines' requirements in a single airliner, Vickers' design team commenced work on producing such an aircraft.

Vicker's initial proposal, known as the Type 870 or alternatively as the Viscount Major, was incapable of meeting BEA's criteria, and was quickly dismissed. On 14 May 1951, Vickers met with Rolls-Royce representatives to discuss potential engines for their envisioned airliner; the meeting led to the decision to adopt the in-development Rolls-Royce Tyne powerplant for its revised proposal. While considerations towards adopting a turbojets engine were made, a study performed in November 1953 found that such an engine would produce inferior performance over shorter routes to a turboprop counterpart.Andrews 1969, pp. 451-452. It was around this time that Vickers' design team also discarded notions of adopting a swept wing, largely due to its providing little benefit at the envisioned airliner's {{convert|400|mph|kn mph kph|order=out|adj=on}} cruise speed, as well as its inferior performance during the approach stage of flight.Andrews 1969, p. 452.

=Redesign=

Despite BEA's initial preference for a high-mounted wing, the company opted for a low-mounted wing following the adoption of a double-bubble fuselage. This type of fuselage was necessary because of the large proportion of freight which BEA needed to carry. It was considered by Vickers to be impractical if carried at the same level as the passengers due to the excessive length that would be required, but carrying the freight in a lengthy hold beneath the main cabin was a practical arrangement. Furthermore, TCA wanted a low-mounted wing, which would make the aircraft easier to refuel, de-ice and service, as well as giving a statistically significant improvement in survival in the event of a water landing.Andrews 1969, p. 453.

By 13 April 1955, the range of design studies had been shortlisted down to five, these remaining concepts were jointly evaluated by BEA and Vickers. Of these submissions, it was recognised that the combination of the low-mounted wing and the double-bubble fuselage represented the optimum configuration, having offered the best capacity and versatility amongst other attributes. This conceptual aircraft, referred to as the Type 870 Scheme 16a, could accommodate 88 passengers, a cruising speed of {{convert|420|mph|kn mph kph|order=out}} at {{cvt|25000|ft|m}}, and payload of {{cvt|20000|lb|kg}}. While BEA were interested in relatively short, sub-1000 mile, routes, its fuel tanks were progressively enlarged over several revisions to give a range of {{convert|2600|mi|km}} so that the airliner would be acceptable to TCA as well.Andrews 1969, p. 454.

The Type 900 was a further revision of the design, featuring an expanded payload capacity of {{cvt|21000|lb|kg}} and carry up to 93 passengers. Following some relatively minor revisions, which largely bolstered the gross weight upwards, that were made to better suit the design to the needs of global customers, the definitive Type 950 proposal emerged. On 20 July 1960, BEA placed an initial order for 20 Type 950s, the type becoming subsequently known as the Vanguard; the airline publicly announced the order and its intended plan for the new airliner to succeed the Viscount in its fleet.Andrews 1969, p. 455.

At the time, TCA was, while intensely interested in the airliner, not yet willing to commit itself, partially due to the basic model not entirely fulfilling its requirements, such as the level of capacity for air mail. Vickers recognised that a high-density seating configuration, accommodating up to 139 passengers to be carried, would likely be attractive to more operators, and designed the Type 952 model for this market. Following a particularly vigorous evaluation, during early January 1957, TCA announced that it had placed an order for 20 Type 952s. With a follow-on order for three more aircraft, it would be, measured in dollar worth, the largest single export deal in postwar Britain's history at that time.

=Into production=

The launch of the programme commenced immediately following BEA's initial order for the type. Due to the substantial growth of the airliner during the concept phase, engine supplier Rolls-Royce set about scaling up the Tyne engine from its initial output of {{cvt|2750|hp|kW|-3}} to at least {{cvt|4000|hp|kW}}. As the Vanguard's production line was coming online at Vickers' Weybridge facility, BEA recognised that, due to the typically short length of its routes, a higher density economy seating configuration could be adopted without impacting performance. Accordingly, on 23 July 1957, Vickers announced a new model, the Type 953, which could handle payloads of up to {{cvt|29000|lb|kg}}, which greatly improved the operating costs for BEA's preferred model; the airline quickly converted its order to six Type 951s and 14 Type 953s.Andrews 1969, p. 456.

On 20 January 1959, the first Type 950 prototype G-AOYW conducted its maiden flight.Wright Air International April 1997, p. 242.Andrews 1969, pp. 456-457. The flight, a transfer to Wisley three miles away, had been planned for December but the engines were returned to Rolls-Royce for minor work. Proper flight testing was then carried out from Wisley.[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1959/1959%20-%200317.html "Vanguard Maiden Flight."] Flight, 30 January 1959, p. 150. While development proceeded relatively smoothly, apart from over 2,000 flights being required to resolve unacceptable stalling characteristics, the last weeks of trials with BEA in early 1960 uncovered some engine-related difficulties, necessitating a brief delay while the compressor rotor was modified.Andrews 1969, pp. 458-459. With the issue resolved, the Vanguard entered revenue service with TCA on 1 February 1961, and with BEA one month later.Andrews 1969, p. 459.

However, by the time of the Vanguard's entry to service, the attitudes of the travelling public had shifted in favour of the new bypass jet engines which did not use propellers.Andrews 1969, pp. 459-460. Passengers typically preferred the additional speed, even at the disadvantage of greater operating costs and thus higher ticket prices, that came with jet-powered airliners. As such, the turboprop-powered Vanguard did not sell well, although those examples that were introduced typically performed well in numerous capacities, and often had lengthy service lives.Andrews 1969, p. 460.

Design

The Vickers Vanguard was a turboprop-powered airliner designed for short- and medium-range services. The principal difference between the Vanguard and the preceding Viscount was in the construction of the fuselage; the Vanguard lower fuselage was similar to that of the Viscount but the top section had a larger-diameter giving a double bubble cross-section (somewhat similar to the Boeing Stratocruiser). The primary result of the larger upper portion was a more spacious interior, along with an increase in cargo capacity below the floor of the main cabin.Swanborough 1962, p. 99. A low-mounted straight wing was also adopted for the type, despite considerations towards shoulder-mounted and swept-wing alternatives.Andrews 1969, pp. 452-453. Aviation author C. F. Andrews observed the design to be orthodox in practically every respect.Andrews 1969, pp. 457-458.

The Vanguard's larger and heavier fuselage presented an obvious need to be combined with a more powerful engine, which led to the adoption of the newly-developed Rolls-Royce Tyne engine. This powerplant was capable of generating a nominal {{cvt|4000|hp|kW}}, in comparison to the Viscount's Rolls-Royce Dart of about {{cvt|1700|hp|kW}}. The Tyne engine enabled the Vanguard to be operated at a substantially greater service ceiling and cruising speed. The Vanguard was one of the fastest turboprop airliners to ever be built, including much later designs such as the Saab 2000 and de Havilland Canada Dash 8. A pilot report describes maintaining {{cvt|10000|ft|m}} altitude with three engines at idle power and propellers feathered and the port outer engine at maximum cruise power.Aviation Week, 14 September 1959, pp. 57, 59.

The flight deck of the Vanguard was particularly spacious for the era.Andrews 1969, p. 458. The flying controls were designed with manual operation in mind and were aerodynamically balanced. In spite of this arrangement, according to Andrews, the onboard electrical systems were a major advance over the previous generation of airliners; amongst other capabilities, the engines could be started without the aid of a ground support cart. The Vanguard possessed relatively docile stall characteristics, in part due to the dihedral positioning of its horizontal stabiliser, which kept it clear of the jet efflux from the engines and aided longitudinal stability.Andrews 1969, p. 457. However, acceptable stalling behaviour only came after an extensive programme of over 2,000 stalls to correct initial very violent tendencies which included rolling inverted.Trubshaw, Brian, with Edmondson, Sally, Test Pilot, {{ISBN|0 7509 1838 1}}, p. 48

Operational history

File:Vickers 952 Vanguard CF-TKA BC TOR 26.03.71 edited-1.jpg at Toronto Airport in March 1971, with a Douglas DC-9-32 in the background]]

The Vanguard entered service with BEA and TCA in late 1960. BEA operated its first Vanguard schedule on 17 December from Heathrow to Paris. Following delivery of its full fleet of six V951 and 14 V953 aircraft by 30 March 1962, the type took over many of BEA's busier European and UK trunk routes. The aircraft received names of famous Royal Navy warships; the first (registered G-APEA) was named "Vanguard", however by the time that the aircraft were delivered, BEA had adopted its new "red square" livery, which saw the end of naming and none of the Vanguards actually carried a name. Initial seating was 18 first-class at the rear and 108 tourist, but this was changed to 139 all-tourist, in which configuration the Vanguard had very low operating costs per seat-mile. On flights up to {{convert|300|mi}}, such as from London to Paris, Brussels and Amsterdam, the type could match the block times of the pure jets which were being introduced in the early 1960s. The remaining BEA fleet passed to British Airways (BA) on 1 April 1974 and the last BA passenger flight with the type was on 16 June 1974.Davis 1981, pp. 87–88.

TCA initiated Vanguard schedules on 1 February 1961 with two flights from Toronto and Montreal via intermediate stops to Vancouver. The fleet was also used on services from Toronto and Montreal to New York and Nassau, Bahamas. Tyne engine reliability was a concern to the airline in the early 1960s. It had a Constellation on stand-by at Dorval Airport in Montreal and at Toronto to take Vanguard passengers in case an engine failed to start.Pigott, Peter, National Treasure: The History of Trans Canada Airlines, 2001,{{ISBN|1 55017 268 9}}, pp. 405, 419

=Cargo operations=

File:Vickers 953C Merchantman, British Airways Cargo AN1927866.jpg]]

In 1966, Air Canada removed all the seats from one of its aircraft and refitted for pure cargo work, in which role it could carry {{cvt|42000|lb|kg}} of freight. Known by the airline as the "Cargoliner", it was the only such conversion, but survived to be the last Canadian Vanguard to be retired in December 1972.Davis 1981, p. 88.

BEA operated nine Vanguards modified to the V953C "Merchantman" all-cargo layout from 1969, with the first two conversions being designed and carried out by Aviation Traders Engineering Ltd (ATEL) at Southend Airport. BEA modified the remainder at Heathrow using kits from ATEL. A large forward cargo door measuring {{convert|139|by|80|inch|cm}} was incorporated. The Merchantmen continued in service with BA until late 1979 when the remaining five were sold.

Air Bridge Carriers purchased several of the Merchantmen and operated them until 1992, when it changed its name to Hunting Cargo Airlines. Hunting Cargo operated its last V953C flight on 30 September 1996 and donated the aircraft, registered G-APEP, to Brooklands Museum on 17 October 1996.Wright, Air International, April 1994, pp. 240, 245.

Accidents and incidents

  • On 27 October 1965, British European Airways Vanguard registration G-APEE, flying from Edinburgh Airport to London Heathrow Airport, during a landing in poor visibility attempted an overshoot but crashed on runway 28R. All on board died – 6 crew and 30 passengers.[http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19651027-0 "Accident description: Vickers Vanguard G-APEE, 27 October 1965."] Aviation Safety Network; retrieved 20 October 2010.
  • On 2 October 1971, British European Airways Flight 706 operated by Vanguard G-APEC, crashed near Aarsele in Belgium. The cause was the failure of the rear pressure bulkhead and subsequent destruction of the tailplane. All 8 crew and 55 passengers died.[http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19711002-1 "Accident description: Vickers Vanguard G-APEC (2 October 1971)"], Aviation Safety Network; retrieved 20 October 2010.
  • On 10 April 1973, Invicta International Airlines Flight 435, operated by Vanguard registration G-AXOP, crashed near Basel-Mulhouse Airport Switzerland. Of the 145 people onboard, 4 crew and 104 passengers died.[http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19730410-1 "Accident description: Vickers Vanguard G-AXOP (10 April 1973)"] Aviation Safety Network; retrieved 20 October 2010.
  • On 29 January 1988, Inter Cargo Service Flight 1004, operated by Vanguard F-GEJF, crashed on takeoff from Toulouse–Blagnac Airport when takeoff was attempted with only three fully operable engines. There were no casualties of the three crew and one passenger aboard.[http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19880129-0 "Accident description: Vickers Vanguard F-GEJF, 29 January 1988."] Aviation Safety Network; retrieved 20 October 2010.
  • On 6 February 1989, Inter Cargo Service Flight 3132, operated by Vanguard F-GEJE, crashed on takeoff from Marseille-Marignane Airport, France. Three crew died; there were no passengers on board.[http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19890206-0 "Accident description: Vickers Vanguard F-GEJE, 6 February 1989."] Aviation Safety Network; retrieved 20 October 2010.

Variants

;Type 950: Prototype, one built and two fuselages were used as static test airframes.

;Type 951: BEA, 20 ordered, six delivered. All in 127-seat, mixed class configuration (18 first and 109 economy).

;Type 952: TCA, more powerful engine and stronger fuselage and wing for higher weights, 23 delivered.

;Type 953: BEA, Same engines as 951, but the stronger airframe of the 952. Mostly operated as 135-seater, all economy, but some configured as 127 mixed class the same as 951. A total of 14 delivered replacing an order for 951s.

;Type 953C Merchantman: Nine Cargo conversions from Type 953.

Operators

{{refimprove section|date=September 2015}}

These airlines operated the Vickers Vanguard:"Database: Vickers Vanguard". Aeroplane, January 2012, pp. 169-183; {{ISSN|0143-7240}}.

♠ original operators

;Canada

;France

;Gabon

;Iceland

File:Merpati Nusantara Vickers 953 Vanguard Fitzgerald.jpg

;Indonesia

;Lebanon

;Singapore

;Sweden

;United Kingdom

File:Invicta International Vanguard G-AZRE.jpg

Aircraft on display

File:Vickers Vangard 953C Merchantman Superb.jpg

  • Type 953C Merchantman Ajax (formerly registered G-APEJ) on static display inside Stratosphere Chamber at the Brooklands Museum, Surrey, England. (nose section only)
  • Type 953C Merchantman Superb (formerly registered G-APEP) at the Brooklands Museum, Surrey, England. The only intact airframe in existence.[http://www.brooklandsmuseum.com/index.php?/explore/vickers-merchantman-vanguard-1969/ "Vickers Merchantman (Vanguard) 1969."] Brooklands Museum. Retrieved 14 July 2011.
  • Type 953C Merchantman Swiftsure (formerly registered G-APES) on static display at East Midlands Aeropark (nose section only)

Specifications (Type 952)

File:Vickers Vanguard cockpit.jpg

{{Aircraft specs

|ref= Vickers Aircraft since 1908Andrews & Morgan 1988, p. 461.

|prime units?= imp

|genhide=

|crew= 3

|capacity= 139 passengers

|length m=

|length ft= 122

|length in= 10+1/2

|span m=

|span ft= 118

|span in= 0

|height m=

|height ft= 34

|height in= 11

|wing area sqm=

|wing area sqft= 1,527

|empty weight kg=

|empty weight lb= 85,000

|gross weight kg=

|gross weight lb= 141,000

|fuel capacity=

|eng1 number= 4

|eng1 name= Rolls-Royce Tyne RTy.11 Mk 512

|eng1 type= turboprops

|eng1 kw=

|eng1 hp=

|eng1 shp= 5,545

|eng1 note= (eshp)

|prop blade number=

|prop name=

|prop dia m=

|prop dia ft=

|prop dia in=

|perfhide=

|max speed kmh=

|max speed mph=

|max speed kts=

|max speed note=

|cruise speed kmh=

|cruise speed mph= 422

|cruise speed note= at {{convert|15000|ft|m|abbr=on}} (high speed cruise)Green 1967, pp. 62–63.

|range km=

|range miles= 1,830

|range note= with maximum payload

|ceiling m= 9,144

|ceiling ft= 30,000

|climb rate ms=

|climb rate ftmin=

|more performance=

|avionics=

}}

See also

{{aircontent|

|related=

|similar aircraft=

|lists=

|see also=

}}

References

=Citations=

{{Reflist}}

=Bibliography=

{{Refbegin}}

  • Andrews, C.F. Vickers Aircraft since 1908. London:Putnam, 1969.
  • Andrews, C.F. and E.B. Morgan. Vickers Aircraft since 1908. London:Putnam, 1988. {{ISBN|0-85177-815-1}}.
  • Davis, Peter W. Vickers Viscount and Vanguard. Tonbridge, Kent, UK: Air-Britain (Historians) Ltd., 1981. {{ISBN|0-85130-091-X}}.
  • Green, William. The Observer's Book of Basic Aircraft: Civil. London: Frederick Warne & Co. Ltd., 1967.
  • [http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1956/1956%20-%200671.html "Preliminary Details of Commercial and Design Characteristics."] Flight, 1 June 1956.
  • Prins, François. "Homage to the Vanguard: Vickers' Four Turboprop Workhorse Bows Out". Air Enthusiast, No. 69, May–June 1997. pp 21–29. {{ISSN|0143-5450}}.
  • Stanfield, Robert I. "[http://archive.aviationweek.com/issue/19590914/#!&pid=54 Aviation Week Pilot Report: Vanguard Demonstrates Single Engine Flight Traits]". Aviation Week. 14 September 1959, Vol. 71, No. 11, pp. 54–57, 59, 61, 65. (Registration required).
  • Swanborough, F. G. Turbine-engined Airliners of the World. London: Temple Press Books, 1962.
  • [http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1959/1959%20-%200157.html "Vanguard: A presentation of Britain's new turboprop airliner."] Flight, 9 January 1959, pp. 61–73.
  • Wright, Alan J. "Right Aircraft, Wrong Time". Air International, Vol. 52, No 4, April 1997, pp. 240–245. {{ISSN|0306-5634}}.

{{Refend}}