Login
Login

WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 25#Rebecca Scofield

{{rfd log header|2025|January 24|2025|January 26}}

=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 25|January 25]]=

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 25, 2025.

==Inter-presidency of Donald Trump==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was Retarget to Donald Trump#Between terms (2021–2025). * Pppery * it has begun... 17:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Too many levels of "huh?" going on here to know what is going on, including the double section redirect target and the lack of this term being in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

  • It's a simple typo of the section #Inter-presidency (2021–present) that existed at time of redirect creation. The section is renamed #First post-presidency (2021–2025) so update/retarget that. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :Not anymore, the "Too many levels of huh?" was part of an edit war that was just solved and has been concluded with an edit request to change the title. Since you two already do not know what I'm talking about, I will explain.
  • :This is my explanation. 2601:483:400:1CD0:A1A4:FD62:9508:F4EB (talk) 02:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

:Comment: I reverted this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inter-presidency_of_Donald_Trump&diff=prev&oldid=1270703321 edit] by Lazesusdasiru to retarget the redirect to Donald Trump#Inter-presidency (2021–2025). (My revert was solely to enforce not changing the target during an ongoing RfD and does not reflect whether or not I support or oppose the edit.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 23:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Individual 1==

File:White equals sign on grey rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was no consensus

. There was support for the delete nomination, however participants also found alternatives to deletion. There was no support for the several alternate targets proposed in the nomination. Hence retargeting to the suggested target that came up: {{section link |Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (July–December 2018) |December}} Jay 💬 18:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

{{Old RfD list|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 8#Individual-1|keep|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 10#Individual One|withdrawn}}

Not mentioned in the target article, and the target section does not exist (anymore). My first consideration was to "refine" to Donald Trump#Mueller investigation since they seems to be what the current target is meant to refer, but the issue of the redirects not being mentioned in the target article still exists. Other options I found were the articles Mueller special counsel investigation and Mueller report, but the redirects do not seem to be mentioned there either. However, this is an alternative name that has several sources ... not sure what the best path is here, but my thoughts are, in order of preference, delete (due to lack of mention), retarget to Donald Trump (remove the section redirect), retarget to Donald Trump#Muller investigation (but it's not mentioned there), or retarget to Mueller special counsel investigation and Mueller report (no mention at either one, my stance is equal on both). Steel1943 (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete because it is a common way to identify people generically -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

:Delete, it's a commonly-used identifier, and this redirect is only for a single slightly notable use of it. FunIsOptional (talk) (use ping please) 13:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget to {{slink|Timeline_of_investigations_into_Donald_Trump_and_Russia_(July–December_2018)#December}} (or a more precise anchor therein), where it is mentioned, without prejudice against retargeting to Trump, the investigation, or the report in the future if the term is reïntroduced on any of those articles. This is a well-known bit of political jargon, and while it could be ambiguous, that's not a good reason to delete unless it is ambiguous. (Cf. Jane Roe, a common litigant pseudonym and yet one with a PTOPIC.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 17:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 23:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget as suggested by Tamzin. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Pakistani kalashnikov==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 5%23Pakistani kalashnikov

==ready mixed==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 20%23ready mixed

==Soyjak.party==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. ✗plicit 23:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Retarget to Wojak#Soyjak or Delete. Been looking into this thing, it's mentioned on my proposed target, and seems more relevant there than here. It's talked about on Twitter and 4chan to some degree from my research, so people might search it here. Possible deletion as the topic appears to be connected to some disruptive editing, the creator of this very redirect, for example. Maybe having nothing (similar to our policy regarding a certain webcomic artist) would be better. Either way I doubt the status quo of this redirect is the best way to go about things. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Keep. Soyjak.party is an imageboard with its own subculture that is distinct from that of 4chan, Twitter, etc. It is notable and could arguably have its own page. The tendency for a user of that particular imageboard to be the kind of person who engages in disruptive editing, does not change the notability and topicality. It is not more relevant on your proposed target. Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep, is discussed at the target with a dedicated section. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep, it's a notable enough imageboard that is mentioned in two articles, so I don't see why the redirect should be deleted. I'm not opposed to retargeting to Soyjak though. Derpytoucan (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

== five gallon bucket ==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was No consensus on whether to delete or restore, hence default to restore since deletion requires an explicit consensus. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

only mentioned in the name of one external link, which i'm honestly not entirely sure isn't spam. five-gallon bucket was an article until 2011, and it surprisingly had some sources, but i think those should be stashed somewhere for later use and the title returned to red as malformed and burgerland-centric, assuming the sources are usable in the first place consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 16:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. I removed the whole EL section anyway, since it was awful. There's nothing special about this particular size, and these are no more useful search terms than n-gallon, m-liter, etc. buckets. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :Ehh, I just noticed that the first one has some history...it claims that a merge happened, but I don't see anything that actually exists at the target. Maybe it did and got removed eventually, but it's long gone if so. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Yes, it was merged. I have tagged the redirect with {{tl|R from merge}}. Jay 💬 14:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Restore and take to AfD (optional) or keep as an R from merge. 5-gallon buckets are likely to be the most common size for buckets, to the point where they might just have icon status. Probs a likely search term too (but it's true that there isn't much there for readers who search it at this time). Had notability enough to exist as an article for 4 years with some references which, even if shoddy, still existed. These are the types of buckets you see at all hardware stores, highly used in street performance and are overall pretty symbolic of many aspects of culture. There was a good chunk at this title prior, and RfD is not the spot to settle the case for inclusion on WP, imo. I think it could stand on its own with some improvement, and/or exist as a section somewhere at the very least with the references.Utopes (talk / cont) 22:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete Does anyone search for this bucket size specifically? Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

::I might tbh, it's a pretty important cultural symbol potentially. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

:::I wasn't expecting to be convinced by this argument, but having googled various bucket sizes (forgive me, I have no earthly idea how big a gallon is), I agree that this is The One True Bucket. They even sell them in Canada, a country that is ostensibly on the metric system, as "5-Gal/19-L" buckets. -- asilvering (talk) 03:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Restore per Utopes. -- Tavix (talk) 22:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Delete or restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep with options on restore. I'm tempted to create a subst:able template to respond to some of these "not mentioned" noms. The rule is to consider deletion if it's not mentioned and also if it's {{xt|"a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name"}}, with an emphasis on non-English translations (e.g., the Chinese Shuǐ → Water). The rule is not to delete redirects, such as this one, whose connection to the subject is patently obvious. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

::Are you using "Shui" as an example of a good redirect to water? Utopes (talk / cont) 05:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

::a "patently obvious connection" isn't necessarily an excuse to keep something if there's no specific info about it in the target. if someone wants info on five gallon buckets so much they're even willing to type two extra words for it (what a hurdle!), they'd likely be disappointed at being redirected to an article that doesn't mention them. which is why i'd prefer if it was instead draftified (yes, draftified, not restored, that pre-blar content is way too yeehaw-centric for something i have at my extremely not murican home), worked into the target, or something else consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 12:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==P:==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 10%23P:

==Texvc==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 00:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Texvc }} → :MediaWiki#Rich content  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Texvc|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Texvc closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Texvc|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Texvc closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Texvc|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Texvc closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

{{Old RfD list|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 25#Texvc|delete}}

I removed the mention from the target in Special:Diff/1267682290. The name of the parser that an optional Math extension to the MediaWiki software used six years ago is undue trivia. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

  • You're probably right, if it does belong anywhere it's probably in the history section (like, Math support predates the extension system and texvc has multiple academic publications about it). I don't really think RfD is the correct venue to discuss this though; the talk page would've been better. Legoktm (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete again per all. Steel1943 (talk) 18:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Violent Pornography==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 03:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Retarget to Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 in order to be consistent with Violent porn and Violent pornography. -Samoht27 (talk) 21:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep per WP:SMALLDETAILS and the capitalized title. Frankly, I'm skeptical that the other two should redirect where they redirect either, since the target is about one country's particular law, part of which includes violence in porn, and not about the overarching concept of violence in porn, which would make a lot more sense. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: Like the IP editor, I'm skeptical that any of these should target an article about one country's law. We don't seem to have an article about the general concept of violent pornography; the most relevant articles I can find are Rape pornography and Bondage pornography. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 20:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep per DIFFCAPS. A conversation about potentially retargeting the other articles should come later. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:27, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Dog poop==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. This is not an issue for RfD. If there is a separate article to be written about "dog poop" as distinct from "feces", my suggestion is that you draft it and submit it to WP:AFC. asilvering (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Dog poop }} → :Feces  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Dog poop|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Dog poop closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Dog poop|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Dog poop closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Dog poop|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Dog poop closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

I feel that there should be an article specifically about dog poop rather than redirecting to the page feces (that article is about feces in general). There are standalone articles specifically about the feces of a specific animal, including Human feces, Cow dung, and Manure. style="color #964b00 Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 21:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Comment, Dog Poo is currently its own redirect, leading to List of South Park characters. If we expand the Dog poop redirect to be a full article, i'd recommending retargeting Dog Poo to the new article. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • This could be repointed to Pooper-scooper, which has some generic information. I think that turning into its own article would be a very good outcome. The only question is whether any editor is willing to do the necessary work. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :i've turned it into a stub article before but it got reverted back to redirecting to feces. style="color #964b00 Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 22:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Where? There's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dog_poop&action=history nothing in the history]. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dog_poop&diff=prev&oldid=1215721038|] This link style="color #964b00 Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 17:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
  • ::::That link shows "(No difference)". However, you had turned it to a one-line stub which was reverted as a {{tqq|Unsourced restatement of title}}. You had then turned it to a disambig which was reverted as {{tqq|Restore - feces seems like the very clear primary topic}}. Jay 💬 11:45, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==James logan elementry school==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 2%23James logan elementry school

==Naver Enter==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. The sole delete vote's rationale was based on there not being a mention in the target article. A mention has been added, so I see rough consensus to keep here. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 03:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Naver Enter }} → :Naver  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Naver Enter|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Naver Enter closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Naver Enter|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Naver Enter closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Naver Enter|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Naver Enter closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Not mentioned in target. Google search gives a bunch of headlines like "Company and Naver Enter Agreement..." and also typos for "never enter", so if this is an actual subunit of the company I cannot find any evidence of it. Rusalkii (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:That is a name of the real website run by Naver. It's a new aggregator. https://m.entertain.naver.com/ Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

::@Emiya Mulzomdao, could you add a sentence to Naver about that? Either way, we should keep this. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

:::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naver&diff=1272198164&oldid=1267091672 Done]. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete this confusing, misleading etc redirect. Without a mention this is confusing and misleading and confusing and misleading redirects should be deleted until they are no longer confusing and misleading. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:Keep mention was added seefooddiet (talk) 08:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Synthetic music==

File:Three disambiguation arrows icon in rounded blue square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was disambiguate

. Jay 💬 15:58, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I don't think this is what most readers would be looking for. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Would you like to see it repointed to Synthesizer? Or to Synth-pop? Or to something else? WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate, as this could also refer to AI-generated music, covered at Music and artificial intelligence. BD2412 T 04:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Note, I have created a list under the redirect on the page, with five reasonably possible targets. BD2412 T 05:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Marplan==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Isocarboxazid. There was agreement that the term is ambiguous, and a disambiguation page may be created at Marplan (disambiguation) with the suggested entries from the discussion. Jay 💬 18:40, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

No mention at target. Isocarboxazid an antidepressant drug currently being sold under the brand name Marplan seems more appropriate. UndeadAnarchy (talk) 13:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Revert/retarget per nom. The name can apparently refer to a number of things, including a (former?) [https://www.nytimes.com/1981/07/07/business/advertising-interpublic-marplan-agreement-reached.html subsidiary of Research International], but the antidepressant appears to be the clear primary topic. - Eureka Lott 22:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate aside from the current and former targets, there's Marketing Planning Corp (Marplan) subsidiary of McCann (company). There's a UK polling organization called Marplan referred to in several Wikipedia articles (A,B,C,etc) -- which makes 4, 3 of which have single target articles; "Marplan" can be added to Research International with that NYT ref to support its entry. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :It sounds like we need a dab page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

::*No objection to creating a disambiguation page, but it should be at Marplan (disambiguation), not at the base title. I performed a WP:GOOGLETEST, and the first item about something other than the antidepressant didn't appear until the eighth page of search results. - Eureka Lott 00:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

::*:A dab page Marplan (disambiguation), with the antidepressant as the primary topic, sounds good to me. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

::A disambiguation page with the AD as the primary topic also sounds good to me. I didn't know about those other articles. Good catch! UndeadAnarchy|✉ 07:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==List of Orange Islands Gym Leaders==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. asilvering (talk) 22:50, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

There is not a list of Orange Islands Gym Leaders at the target. Furthermore "Orange Islands" is not actually mentioned at the target in any capacity, or at least no longer, nor are any of the (presumably) five gym leaders associated with Orange Islands discussed here either. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

  • #1 and #3 have substantive page history and I have tagged them with {{tl|R from merge}}. Jay 💬 10:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of both #1 and #3?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep The rule at WP:RFD#DELETE #8 is to consider deletion if it's not mentioned and it's {{xt|"a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name"}}, with an emphasis on non-English translations (e.g., the Chinese word for water is, but we don't want a redirect created at {{blue|Shuǐ}} to point to Water). The rule is not to delete redirects, such as this one, whose connection to the subject is obvious. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

::Are you saying that the Chinese word for water is a good redirect to Water? Utopes (talk / cont) 05:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

::Rather than following the letter of the law, I'd urge we consider which is more helpful to the reader. Since this isn't mentioned at the target in any capacity, nor is even "orange islands", it is simply baffling for the reader to end up here. So delete per nom. Cremastra (talk) 14:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

  • delete all. none present in the target, all unsourced fancruft pre-blar, all images in the pre-blar content got replaced (which is actually really funny the third time i see it). i'm still of the mind that someone looking for this would want info on those specific characters, but seeing as they're unfortunately unnotable, it's better off leaving them as red links for now consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 12:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==🫃🏻==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Pregnant man. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = 🫃🏻 }} → :Male pregnancy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:🫃🏻|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#🫃🏻 closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:🫃🏻|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#🫃🏻 closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:🫃🏻|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#🫃🏻 closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 
  • {{no redirect|1 = 🫃 }} → :Male pregnancy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:🫃|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#🫃 closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:🫃|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#🫃 closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:🫃|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#🫃 closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Retarget to Pregnant man or pregnancy, consistent with 🫄 and 🫄. LIrala (talk) 04:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Oppose, the current redirect is fine. Pregnant man is a disambiguation page in which the only page that is applicable regarding the emoji is Male pregnancy. The only other term that could remotely be applicable could be Transgender pregnancy. I still think it should just be left alone. Heart (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :I support a retarget to Transgender pregnancy then. LIrala (talk) 05:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • ::The emoji centers around transgender pregnancy, a quick google shows that. LIrala (talk) 05:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :::A search shows the "Pregnant man" emoji, which is what a male pregnancy is. I stand by my opposition to retarget. Heart (talk) 06:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • ::::The article Male pregnancy is mainly about seahorses, while the emoji is of a human man. I think if we end up sticking with the current target, we should at least refine it to the #In humans section of the article. (My first preference is still disambig, per my comment below.) BugGhost 🦗👻 13:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to the disambiguation page Pregnant man. I don't see a way to guess whether readers who search for this emoji are looking for Male pregnancy, Transgender pregnancy, or Couvade syndrome, so we should let them decide for themselves. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 05:22, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget to disambig page Pregnant man, per Mx. Granger. I don't think the current target Male pregnancy is a great target as that article is not specific to human males, while the emoji clearly is of a human. The emoji doesn't display any more info to determine a more specific target, so the disambig page Pregnant man is a suitable choice. BugGhost 🦗👻 13:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Pregnant man per BugGhost and to keep consistency with the other emojis. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Rebecca Scofield==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. asilvering (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

This should be deleted. Rebecca Scofield was falsely accused of being involved in this crime which is the subject of the article to which it redirects and [https://www.idahoednews.org/kevins-blog/professor-prevails-in-tik-tok-defamation-trial/ won a defamation suit over that accusation]. She also (appropriately) isn't mentioned (whether by name or otherwise) in the article to which it redirects. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

:Support - If the false accusation isn't notable enough to be mentioned in the article, there is no point in having a redirect. (However, I do not think mentioning her in the article is entirely out of the question, simply because it was a false accusation; even false accusations can be notable, as in the Dreyfuss affair. I have no opinion about the notability in this particular case.) Nø (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

::Hi, Nø! Can you clarify what you support? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

:::Unless she is actually mentioned by name in the article, I support the proposed deletion of the redirect. Nø (talk) 15:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Oppose - Scofield is part of the case. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not mentioned at target, making this a misleading redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
  • {{u|Some1}} removed names with summary {{tq|too much WP:UNDUE weight given to the lawsuit.}} but kept content about the lawsuit, which was later removed. Note that mention of the tiktoker who accused her, Ashley Guillard was also removed, but continues to be a redirect to the same target. Jay 💬 18:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Strong delete. Scofield had no connection to the killings and it is misleading and a serious BLP violation for us to in any way, even inadvertently, suggest that she might have. The only reason to mention her would be if the defamatory and delusional allegations had become so prominent that it became necessary to discuss them in order to refute them, but fortunately, that is not the case. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • If the name doesn't deserve a mention in the event article, it is at most trivia and should be deleted to avoid speculation as to her association with the events. Jay 💬 22:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==RStat==

File:White i in purple rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was Retarget/delete * Pppery * it has begun... 17:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target. On the other hand, there is Berkeley_r-commands#rstat. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

:* Delete as per nom. Not mentioned at all on target. - Dyork (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

:*:My suggestion was to retarget. I have also now realised that {{-r|RStat}} exists, where retargeting would not be appropriate, however. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget per nom. And if RStat is bundled here, delete (only) that. Jay 💬 11:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Adding RStat to this nomination since it was mentioned by participants.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Retarget Rstat to Berkely_r-commands#rstat, and delete RStat per nom User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 04:02, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Great Dane (artwork)==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Sybilla Mittell Weber. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

No mention of any artwork in the target page, though there've been a couple of attempts to shoehorn it in. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment an etching by Sybilla Mittell Weber called "Great Dane" appears in her article -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Incorrect. The Art sub-section talks about an artpiece in an exhibition. Jay 💬 15:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 14:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Sub-section was apparently removed from the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

::Struck my comment. Did not know that nom removed the Art sub-section as WP:TRIVIA. Retarget to Sybilla Mittell Weber per IP65, tag as {{tl|R to creator}}. Jay 💬 11:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:::That's a different artwork. The one that the nom removed started like this: "Great Dane is a 2019 conceptual site-specific performance by British artist Ben Aronson..." WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

::::Right. Both articles were about different art works, and now one of them has been removed, so retarget is now an option. Jay 💬 07:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Macguide==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Feel free to recreate if a mention were to (re)develop. -- Tavix (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Macguide }} → :Apple community  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Macguide|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Macguide closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Macguide|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Macguide closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Macguide|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Macguide closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 
  • {{no redirect|1 = MacGuide }} → :Apple community  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:MacGuide|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MacGuide closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:MacGuide|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MacGuide closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:MacGuide|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#MacGuide closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

No mention of "Guide" at the target article. Apparently used to be an article about the "MacGuide Magazine" but redirecting a specific magazine name to the general article about the apple community is not going to be helpful for readers who are left without context on why they ended up at the place they did. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Can the pre-BLAR page content be merged to the history of the Macintosh platform? An editor named User:MacGuide did edit the article saying {{tq|Elan Associates acquired MacGuide.}} and {{tq|Elan now publishes MacGuide...}}. This was in 2007. Jay 💬 07:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Also macguide may be bundled here. Jay 💬 07:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Bundled together with Macguide as suggested above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==122333221==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 2%23122333221

==Varoke==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. -- Tavix (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Varoke }} → :Habbo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Varoke|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Varoke closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Varoke|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Varoke closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Varoke|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Varoke closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 
  • {{no redirect|1 = Snouthill }} → :Habbo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Snouthill|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Snouthill closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Snouthill|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Snouthill closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Snouthill|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Snouthill closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Not mentioned at the target, nor any other article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

::The rule at WP:RFD#DELETE #8 is to consider deletion if it's not mentioned at the target and it's {{xt|"a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name"}}, such as the title of the article being translated into a non-English language that is unrelated to the article's subject. The rule is not to delete redirects whose connection to the subject is obvious.. Have you tried to figure out whether these things should be mentioned in the article? A Reddit post claims that the second is a miniseries for the game. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

:::if your best source is reddit, i think they can be safely deleted consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 12:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom; no mentions of "varoke" or "snouthill" on the entire website. Unclear relation to the target and reader's questions will not be answered when they search this term. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Notified of Varoke's nomination at the target talk page. Jay 💬 06:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. No mention at the target, so the reader will be left confused. Cremastra (talk) 14:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==List of aircraft and infantry equipment of the Indian Army==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:39, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

The target does not include any aircraft, which are listed at List of active Indian military aircraft. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Comment based on page history appears to be a redirect created by a page move. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

::After further investigation, I found this talk thread which explains the whole situation. Therefore changing my vote to Speedy delete under WP:G7, since author stated intent to delete page. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 01:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Wikipedia:BRRRRRD==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 2%23Wikipedia:BRRRRRD

==Stickerless==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 1%23Stickerless

==1LLL==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was speedy delete

. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = 1LLL }} → :Speedcubing#1LLL  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:1LLL|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#1LLL closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:1LLL|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#1LLL closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:1LLL|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#1LLL closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Delete: section no longer exists and is unmentioned in the article -1ctinus📝🗨 00:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Sure (as the redirect creator). 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).