Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 South American U-15 Championship squads

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=2011 South American U-15 Championship squads}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=2011 South American U-15 Championship squads}})

Fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTN as collection of children, most of them non-notable. I don't see any of these having any chance of retention, given the precedent to delete youth squads across continents and sports at AFD/2019 AFC U-16 Women's Championship squads, AFD/2022 South American Under-17 Women's Football Championship squads, AFD/2016 South American U-17 Women's Championship squads, AFD/2017 AFF U-18 Youth Championship squads, AFD/2015 FIBA Africa Under-16 Championship squads, AFD/2009 FIBA Africa Under-16 Championship for Women squads, AFD/2011 African U-17 Championship squads, AFD/2013 SAFF U-16 Championship squads, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 OFC U-16 Men's Championship squads, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 UNAF U-20 Tournament squads.

I am also nominating the following related pages:

:{{la|2013 South American U-15 Championship squads}}

:{{la|2017 South American U-15 Championship squads}}

:{{la|2019 South American U-15 Championship squads}}

:{{la|2023 South American U-15 Championship squads}}

Geschichte (talk) 19:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Lists of people, Football, and South America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep – In the case of South American football in particular, I see WP:SIGCOV with all articles being widely referenced. The notability of under-15 players is obviously not immediate, but the call-up list as a complement in itself is relevant. Svartner (talk) 23:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• :The federation posting, or an outlet reposting, the squad list is hardly significant coverage? Geschichte (talk) 05:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• ::Yes, considering that squad lists are complementary information. But practically all countries in South America have media coverage of the competition. Svartner (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
• :::The competitions are not the ones up for deletion. That being said, they themselves lack secondary sources. The competition pages are where work should be put in, not endless stat pages about pubescent children. Geschichte (talk) 09:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• ::::All articles listed have plenty of references. And about just being kids, it depends, if you look at the older articles, most of the players ended up becoming relevant. The logic for CONMEBOL due to the relevance of football on the continent differs from parallel situations in CAF/AFC/OFC. Svartner (talk) 01:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. Long-standing consensus these kinds of lists of essentially children are not inherently notable. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 08:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete—per above. Anwegmann (talk) 02:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete all fail WP:NLIST. LibStar (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.