Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMK Hub

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[AMK Hub]]=

:{{la|AMK Hub}} ([{{fullurl:AMK Hub|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMK Hub}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unsourced spam; would require a complete rewrite Chzz ► 18:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep. Needs sourcing and cleanup, but as it's a notable place, we shouldn't delete it. Did the nominator attempt sourcing or cleanup? Here's a couple of sources:[http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/301417/1/.html][http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporebusinessnews/view/273331/1/.html]. Fences&Windows 23:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep and rewrite per Fences and windows Knowitall (talk) 22:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep It appears to be notable, simply poorly written. Rmosler | ● 21:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.