User talk:Fences and windows

Hi Fences

Thanks for closing :Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_9#Category:Kentucky_colonels.

However, you just deleted the category pages, without emptying the category. That leaves ~125 pages still in the non-existent :Category:Kentucky colonels, contrary to WP:REDNOT.

Please can you list the category at WP:Categories for discussion/Working#Empty_then_delete, so that the bot will empty the category. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

:Yes, I just came here to ask the same question. You can't delete categories like you would an article or talk page unless it is empty. You either have to manually change each page in the category or have a bot do it. But it doesn't happen automatically. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

::Sorry, BrownHairedGirl and Liz, I'd asked about this at VPT before and was given the impression this was done by a bot automatically at CfD. Is there a closing script to do this? I've added it now; does it work post-deletion? Fences&Windows 11:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

:::Yes, the bot works fine post-deletion. The bot just does what it's told at WP:CFDW, where your entry[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Working&diff=prev&oldid=1011528609] looks fine.

:::Before closing any XFD, it's a good idea to read the instructions. In this case, they are at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

::::Aye, noted. BrownHairedGirl, does the bot work for categories speedily deleted without CFD? Fences&Windows 14:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

::::{{yo|Fences and windows}} the bot works only off the instructiuons provided to it at WP:CFDW, under the various headings. Category speedy deletions outside of CFD are very rare. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

:::::BrownHairedGirl, there were a couple of dozen speedy deletion nominations recently due to creations by a banned user, which prompted my query at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_188#Emptying_a_category after I had deleted and manually emptied several of them. I guess we need to follow the advice there to open a CFD, which makes speedy deletions more difficult. Ah well. Thanks for setting me right and your quick responses. Fences&Windows 15:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

::::::{{yo|Fences and windows}} I hadn't thought of the banned-user-rollbacks. But, to be honest, I deplore those speedy deletions of category pages cos they were created by a banned user. It's quite rare for a banned user to be the only person to populate a category, so it is a v bad idea to delete the whole show just because the category page creator has been banned.

::::::Much better to list the categories at CFD, as {{yo|Redrose64|p=}} advised at VPT. This doesn't involve lots of extra work, because WP:TWINKLE makes a CFD nomination easy, and it saves a lot of work from undoing inappropriate speedies. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

120px

Here is a brownie for you for all the immense amount of help you gave by reviewing my article on Puneett Chouksey and closing the AFD of Speedily delete on that article.

Have a great day Sir/Ma'am!--Aleyamma38 (talk) 10:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Would you be so kind to block this anonymous user. He keeps reverting my edits and it’s so annoying. TylerKutschbach (talk) 01:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

:Please discuss with them on the talk pages, TylerKutschbach. Also leave a message on the IP's talk pages. I've semi-protected the pages for two days - that is not an invitation for you to revert again, as you risk being blocked for edit warring. You may already have breached WP:3RR. Fences&Windows 01:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fences and windows. I'm very concerned that your comments at BLPN regarding the Sasha Grey misrepresent my position, my comments, and the available references. If there's anything I can do to clarify my position, please let me know. --Hipal (talk) 22:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

:We can continue discussion at BLP/N; my comments my not capture your intent, but I believe they address the consequences of your position. I will edit to clarify. Fences&Windows 16:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

::I'm not sure if that can work, as I don't think you understand my position despite my clarifications. Thanks for the refactoring. --Hipal (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

:::Maybe I don't understand your position or the basis for your position, Hipal, but it's best not to fork the debate. I think consensus is against you at both the talk page and noticeboard so you need to better articulate 1) the grounding of your position in our policies and guidelines and 2) the practical consequences of your position for the article and its sourcing in order to persuade people. I'm really not aiming to be obtuse. Fences&Windows 21:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

::::It's not a debate. There are no sides. I agreed to allow the article to be revised to whatever Morbidthoughts wanted, provided there are BLP-quality references backing them. He's done so as best he can, so that's resolved.

::::I've reached out to you to try to prevent misunderstanding and the problems that develop from working from misunderstanding.

::::I'd hoped that editors would discuss quality of sources, weight, and any other relevant policies, guidelines, or general consensus. It appears that will not happen. --Hipal (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

:::::Your responses at BLP/N have been quite terse and you don't always clearly explain what you are proposing and what the policy basis is. If you could expand more on that and not take pushback personally (which I acknowledge is difficult, especially in light of some of my own rhetoric) then others might understand what you're aiming for. Fences&Windows 00:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

::::::Thanks. I've put far too much time and effort into this already. At this point, I'm going to wait to see what the ip's do when the protection is lifted. --Hipal (talk) 16:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fences and Window. I wanted get your advice and follow up on an issue we discussed at WP:AI#Incidents involving User:Sundayclose. I respect your opinion. First, thanks for the even-handed manner in which you handled that matter. I need advice about the IP socks of {{user|Cadeken}}. As I said at ANI, Cadeken is a prolific sockmaster, using both registered socks and numerous IP socks. I'm almost certain that Cadeken's latest registered sock is {{user|Keith Ann Nikolas}} because of an identical editing pattern (articles related to mass killers and other violent crimes), but I'll deal with that at SPI. My concern is that inevitably when a Cadeken sock is blocked, soon after an IP located in central California emerges, making similar edits, often amid a registered sock edits. For example, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_youngest_killers&type=revision&diff=1012602000&oldid=1012601722 here]. Sometimes they are constructive edits, but often they are disruptive. To determine whether the sources are constructive, I would have to go to every source to confirm, and often these socks cite multiple sources. That's very time consuming, and with my limited time on Wikipedia, I probably would not take the time to do so. I could report the IP at SPI, but that often doesn't confirm sockpuppetry (and I understand why). So are those my only options? If so, I suspect the IPs problem edits will remain in articles for a long time, as they typically have in the past. I'm not complaining about how Wikipedia operates, but I want to make sure I have no other options before moving on to other matters here. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 22:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

:Hi Sundayclose, one thing I can do is semi-protect the usual/recent editing targets - let's put that together. I suspect they'll widen their target articles, but it'll disrupt their editing pattern.

:If there is an obvious IP sockpuppet immediately after a block, reverting on sight and noting the block evasion in the edit summary and at the talk page seems reasonable. Fences&Windows 23:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

::There are some articles that are frequent targets. I'll let you know when I see them. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 00:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

:::F&W, please see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken. Is it appropriate for me now to revert Keith Ann Nikolas on sight, or do I need to cull through edits to separate the good from the bad? How about the IP? I'm not asking for your admin action, just advice. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

::::Sundayclose, it's a DUCK case, but wait for the SPI close then revert en masse. You're not obliged to check each edit, though be careful not to restore BLP violations etc.

::::As you've seen, I've semi-protected many of the recent repeat targets. Let me know of any I missed: STEM School Highlands Ranch shooting, Richland High School shooting, List of child abuse cases featuring long-term detention, Montgomery v. Louisiana, Miller v. Alabama, Tilden High School (Chicago), Federal Correctional Institution, Tucson, John Getreu, Roy Charles Waller, List of school shootings in the United States (before 2000), GEDmatch, Washington State Penitentiary, List of longest prison sentences served, 2019 college admissions bribery scandal, Lydia Gouardo, Family Tree DNA, List of suspected perpetrators of crimes identified with GEDmatch, List of youngest killers. Fences&Windows 19:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Revdel Request for {{Diff|diff=1012814569}} .. thank you, CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

:Sorry CommanderWaterford, I wasn't online. I see it's been dealt with. Fences&Windows 20:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

User_talk:Bishonen#The_days_of_manually_adding_protection_tags_are_done! Regards, El_C 13:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

:Thanks El_C, I use the magic of Twinkle which does it all for me bar the thinking. Fences&Windows 14:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fences and windows, I pinged you but also wanted to leave you a courtesy notice about the post-Requested Move discussion here Talk:Murder_of_Rachel_Nickell#Requested_move_16_March_2021. Thank you, Some1 (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I am new to all of this BLP bullshit. But I really appreciated your edits on the BLP board for the porn star. (Remember the internet was built on porn!) But seriously it is cool that you want to save edits.

Have a nice day man. Peace. Infinitepeace (talk) 01:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

:That’s OK, I think we should give a complete picture of any person's career including Grey's. My go-to response for most issues on Wikipedia is to hunt for sources. Fences&Windows 09:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

::me too. Anytime you need a second look at something or help finding sources, let me know. Is there a group of editors like you? I know that BLP Noticeboard tends to attract people that like to delete other people's work, is there a page that people who support edits gather? thanks again! have a great weekend! Infinitepeace (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

:::Hi Infinitepeace, maybe Wikipedia:Help desk, Wikipedia:Teahouse, or the Wikipedia:Reference desks? There are also Wikipedia:WikiProjects, Wikipedia:Contests, and Wikipedia:Good article nominations for collaborative, constructive editing. Fences&Windows 23:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

It looks as if the editor whose IP 74.127.202.204 you blocked for block evasion after I raised their edits at BLPN[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&diff=1012458546&oldid=1012458170] is back, now at 74.127.202.115, making the same categorisations on often flimsy evidence[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.127.202.115], Do you want to deal with it or should I raise it elsewhere? NebY (talk) 17:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

:Thanks NebY, I've blocked 74.127.202.0/24 for a month. Fences&Windows 18:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks for that. Do you have the capability to quickly revert all of the edits? I've been doing it one at a time. Sundayclose (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

:::I just used rollback on them all, Sundayclose. Fences&Windows 18:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

::Thank you! NebY (talk) 18:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

They're back again on 74.127.202.46[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.127.202.46] categorising or (new) decategorising people as having a personality disorder, sometimes aligned with mentions in the articles and sometimes not, with facetious and serious edit summaries. NebY (talk) 10:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

:Thanks NebY, I've blocked the range again for another three months. Fences&Windows 10:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks again. I've discovered watchlisting categories works now, hurrah, so I've done that. They seem a bit of a BLP risk. NebY (talk) 14:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

::I see you've revdel'd one article. I don't know if you want to go back so far, but I found the claim inserted into the articles's text in 2017[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lonnie_Hammargren&diff=761847771&oldid=758750362]. I removed it last month without thinking to ask for revdel, sorry. NebY (talk) 15:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

:::Thanks for your vigilance! I revdelled further back, I couldn't verify that claim. Fences&Windows 19:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Just over three months later, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.127.203.206 they're back] as IP 74.127.203.206, adding disorder categories that aren't supported by article text in any I've sampled, mostly with the summary "i added him to another category". Some are BLPs again. Would you like to block them again? NebY (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

{{userlinks|Infinitepeace}} seems to be inviting proxy editing on their talk page. I tried to post the actual policies, hoping to have a discussion as to whether what they are doing is allowed, but the links to the policies were deleted and I was asked to stay off their talk page (which of course I will do). I am still not sure whether the invitation to proxy edit is allowed, so I am reluctant to go to ANI. What do you think? Allowed or not allowed? --Guy Macon (talk) 01:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

:Hi Guy Macon, I've been pinged myself to save the article up for speedy deletion, but I'm not going near a checkuser block by a member of ArbCom. Fences&Windows 14:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

::I am going to just go ahead and delete the section where they invite proxy editing. If they revert again I will have to think of something else. If that happens, can a speedy be used for just part of a page, should I request speedy on the whole thing, go to MfD, or go to AE? --Guy Macon (talk) 15:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

:::I doubt anyone will answer the request to edit on their behalf or pursue their complaints, but a discussion about principles at AN wouldn't hurt. I think an editor who is blocked for a period of time might still legitimately prepare content in their talk page and discuss with editors things other than their block, but not an indef blocked editor - and especially not a sockpuppet of a blocked editor. Fences&Windows 17:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

::::Another admin blocked talk page access, so we are done here. Thanks for the clarification. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:37, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Just curious about what you think of this. Thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 05:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

:I replied at the noticeboard. Fences&Windows 14:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

::Amazing reply, thank you for your thoughtful work there.--- Possibly (talk) 18:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi F&W, {{userlinks|TylerKutschbach}} has resumed adding the same unsourced content to articles that you blocked them for. They [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Pennsylvania&diff=1014793277&oldid=1014228095 changed] the results at 2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania without providing a source. I reverted them and issued an ap DS alert. They then [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Pennsylvania&diff=next&oldid=1014819891 reverted me], again without providing a source. Their contributions seem to show a high volume of similar edits that are unsourced except for a claim about "Dave's atlas" in the edit summary. Can you re-block them? Thanks. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 01:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

:Done. Fences&Windows 08:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I had submitted an article and it was deleted under Section G4 for speedy deletion on the basis of a discussion which was done in September, 2018. The Wikipedia page submitted in 2018 was not prepared by me. I had submitted the link to a forbes article on the company that was published on 27th January, 2021, was the article considered before deleting the page?

Please recover the article for further editing.

Thanks,

--Adv.devanshmalhotra (talk) 02:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

:"The pages slugged ‘Brand Connect’ are equivalent to advertisements and are not written and produced by Forbes India journalists." Adv.devanshmalhotra, the article was written using promotional sources like this. We can’t use such sources, see WP:RS. Fences&Windows 08:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

Got it! I will go through the same for a better understanding. Can you please recover the article as a draft in my account so that I can continue working on it.

Thanks

--Adv.devanshmalhotra (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.

:*Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the {{code|delete-redirect}} userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. ({{phab|T278350}})

:*Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. ({{phab|T277803}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)}}

Thanks for you comment on my ANI report about Wikieditorial101. Take a look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Lightbringer_(usurped_-_blocked) this Freemasonry-fixated LTA]. One and the same? Looks pretty DUCKy to me.Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

:I'm not convinced it's the same user, Beyond My Ken, but I have indef blocked them for their repeated personal attacks and digging a deeper hole at AN/I. Fences&Windows 00:18, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks for that, I appreciate it. When I get the time I may dig a little deeper into the LTA and into Wikieditorial101's contribs, just because it might come in handy if (when?) this editor re-appears. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

HI. Just a heads up that there was a comment by {{u|David Fuchs}} on the above AFD, which i believe got deleted in the midst of it being moved. I noticed it because it was a short comment that was cited as 16KB in the history, which only had one entry. I think it's sort of an interstitial metaphysical space thing.--- Possibly (talk) 01:30, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

:I'll check and restore once I've cleaned up incoming links. Fences&Windows 01:32, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks for the title change!--- Possibly (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

:::Possibly, it's all sorted now I think. It took an hour to tidy up after the move - there's a reason AfDs are not usually moved... Fences&Windows 01:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

::::I'm super glad you did it. Thanks.--- Possibly (talk) 01:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gustav_Benedictis

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ruimbarreira1411&action=edit&redlink=1

have both continued to attempt to sanitize the page Caesar DePaco. Ive had to revert all their edits, since they were mostly deletions through false assertions. Ruimbarreira introduced a huge rant on both the english and portuguese wikipedia, about how the media is engaged in a conspiracy and acting against his client. He is the individual's lawyer, and threatened to sue people in PT wikipedia. In fact he did file in court agaisnt PT wikipedia. See this edit for the rant

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caesar_DePa%C3%A7o&oldid=1019985689

see this edit and the final paragraph of the introduction. The only reference to this is the individual's own assertions, which are fine to be linked and part of the article, even if they are completely and demonstrably false.

Ruimbarreira1411 has actually sued portuguese wikipedia in an attempt to remove this page from existence.

see here - https://blog.wikimedia.pt/2021/04/16/wikimedia-portugal-foi-ilibada-em-tribunal/

Gustav Benedictis is a new account, suddenly appeared, says they've lived in Florida and they are from Madeira... the same location as the person the article is about. (amazing coincidence). He also sanitizes the page for Summit Nutritionals Int., the company that's owned by Caesar DePaco. Another amazing coincidence.

Hope I can get your attention as this page is being constantly vandalised both here and in PT wikipedia, where I've contacted the admins there.

Kranke133 (talk) 16:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

:Kranke133, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Caesar_DePa%C3%A7o_-_legal_threats. Fences&Windows 20:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, definitely not trying to make this a 'I know/am smarter than you' or anything, but I am very big into video games, especially Nintendo. This draft is definitely a hoax:

• From the talk page: "If the game is officially announced we need to really update this article, and if its not real lets not delete it." - this was created by the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/107.146.244.150 same IP] who created Draft:The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker HD + Ganondorf's Fury (that you've now just deleted) as well as Draft:The Legend of Zelda 35 (also recently deleted)
• Also just found Draft:Game & Watch: The Legend of Zelda, another hoax... the two sources used in there are both regarding the recent Mario Game & Watch, not a Zelda one. Same draft also says it releases in November 2020 in the lead, and says in 2021 in the infobox. Same scenario regarding a comment on the talk page: "We need to update this article a lot if its real and please do not delete it if its not real. OK."
• The [https://screenrant.com/zelda-3d-all-stars-game-collection-classic-titles/ Screenrant article] you linked is indeed just wishful/hopeful thinking, AKA, purely speculation- mostly based off of the recent Super Mario 3D All-Stars
• Note the usage of 'likely' and 'could' throughout the article
• The article is from January 26, 2021. Note how one of the paragraphs starts off with, "February 21 marks the 35th anniversary of The Legend of Zelda series. If a Zelda 3D All-Stars exists, then it will likely be announced shortly before or on the anniversary." It's now May 2021, so clearly that did not happen...

TL;DR- game is definitely something not in existence currently, as in not announced by any means whatsoever by Nintendo. Article you linked to is purely speculation about it existing/what it could contain.

Thanks. Magitroopa (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

:I think it's probably a hoax too, Magitroopa, but the existence of speculative sourcing for such a release makes it hard to apply the CSD criterion. It says "This only applies to cases where the deception is so obvious as to constitute pure vandalism" and WP:DWHOAX says "Hoaxes are generally not speedy deletion candidates". CSD is conservative by design. If you nominate at MfD, it'll likely not last long. Fences&Windows 00:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Now I don't have enough time to be in Wiki, so I have missed your message. This site copypasted my list not vice versa, please restore. The major content was the list of actual drivers with the Platinum status and references, not the requirements for the platinum categorisation. Corvus tristis (talk) 05:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

:Corvus tristis, I've restored it and I'm sorry I didn't check more carefully. The Wikipedia page does precede that website. This was caught up in some pages AS19Portsmouth created. Fences&Windows 20:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ragesoss

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.

:*The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at {{phab|T112147}} if you have objections.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)}}

Hello F&W, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive333#Topic_ban_appeal_part_deux discussion at AN] was automatically archived again (shouldn't it wait a bit more after new comments? Less than 24h had passed I think). But I would really appreciate some guidance and an answer to my questions. Sorry to bother you specifically but nobody else took action (I really appreciate you did) and I don't know who to ask. I would rather not reopen that discussion myself if I can receive an answer in another way. Thank you. -- {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 12:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

:Gtoffoletto, you said at AN/I you want to "clear my name from this Sword of Damocles", however a topic ban is not a threat but protective. You've successfully edited for a year without impinging on your topic ban area so you may breathe easy.

:You have a tendency to wikilawyer and bludgeon, being over-fixated on process and self-justification, which I believe leads you to not take on board what people say. In appearing to minimize the reasons for your topic ban and arguing with those opposed to it being lifted, you gave too many people the wrong impression.

:The issue is not process but trust. An admin assessed that the community no longer trusted you to edit about UFOs and you have yet to regain that trust. Had I commented at AN/I then I might have agreed to lift the topic ban to give you a second chance, but I cannot override a lack of consensus. You might regain trust by self-reflection, e.g. accepting [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JoJo_Anthrax&oldid=1020372482#Examples_of_POV-pushing what JoJo Anthrax said], taking Wikipedia:Fringe theories to heart, and studying Wikipedia:Civil POV pushing and the other essays linked to in "More on civil POV pushing" for tips on following a more productive path.

:You might lurk or engage at WP:NPOVN, or other noticeboards to get more of a feel for where community consensus lies on contentious issues. You engaged at WP:FTN briefly last year but it was always connected to UFOs, by your own admission engaging in "wild speculation" (see WP:NOTFORUM); [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard&diff=955289557&oldid=955280936][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard&diff=955293657&oldid=955292623] you might try again on other topics in the spirit of the board, i.e. dispassionately discussing how to write about ideas that fall outside the mainstream neutrally and based on high-quality, independent sources.

:A topic ban appeal that might be more successful would acknowledge without spin where you went wrong before, why you want to return to this area, what particular articles you're interested in and what sources you might use to improve them, how you've edited in other (perhaps adjacent) areas without disruption, and how you'll avoid disruption recurring. Fences&Windows 16:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

::Thank you very much for your suggestions and explanations. I often edit about space and aeronautics in my time on Wikipedia (with some interesting detours into other topics) so that is why I feel this is a "Sword of Damocles" hanging over my head (although I don't intend to edit the subject area again given the excessive toxicity). I recognise my failures in dealing with past disputes and agree I could have handled them better. However, I reject accusations of POV pushing and find them unfair. Even the admin that blocked me reviewed the evidence and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gtoffoletto&diff=958540922&oldid=957633103 modified the reason for my ban] to {{tq|disruptive editing in the subject area}}. I agree I was disruptive as I have stated many times. However, I strive to always cite reliable sources and to follow them faithfully. And I believe my record shows that and that has lead the admin to change the ban reason. Is this a fair assessment of the situation in your opinion? JoJo Anthrax said {{tq|I believe it is accurate to say that the basis for your topic ban was expanded, and not simply "changed."}}. But I don't believe that to be accurate from how I understand it.

::File:Il Palazzo di Giustizia di Milano, sede del Tribunale, opera di Marcello Piacentini.jpgp.s. on a philosophical note: process is necessary to ensure trust. Without clear and fair processes people tend to make decisions based on opinion, which is affected by bias and is easily manipulated resulting in unfairness. This is a big problem for Wikipedia. And not an easy one to fix. -- {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 21:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

:::Hey F&W. Understand if you don't want to reply. But could you point me in the right direction to receive answers/guidance with questions like this? I am struggling to understand how all this works. Are there admins that volunteer to give guidance/coaching on such issues for example? I am lost here. Thanks. -- {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 09:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

::::Gtoffoletto, you seem unreceptive to my advice so I stopped replying. What you're looking for is Wikipedia:Mentorship and there's one available admin at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters. Fences&Windows 10:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

:::::I'm sorry you feel that way. I've greatly appreciated and read carefully all your suggestions and guidance. I'll do the same with your last advice and see if an admin has time to help me out with some of the questions that I still have. Thanks for the help. -- {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 10:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

• {{la|Seth Abramson}}

Hi,

Yesterday I replied to your comment here. Telmo6T has not edited since your warning, but shortly after my comments and a couple of article edits, a brand new single-purpose account UTorontoPHD was registered and emerged to the scene with similar behaviour; making promotional edits, including promotional edits like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seth_Abramson&diff=prev&oldid=1023822949 this].

I considered opening a sockpuppet investigation or another COIN discussion, but I realise that neither may not be an optimal solution in this case. Do you have a suggestion? Thanks, Politrukki (talk) 21:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

:Thanks, Politrukki. It's plainly the same editor, but as they've abandoned that old account there's no call for SPI. I've reiterated the earlier warning, let's see if that and discussion is enough without needing to go to COIN. They appear to be engaging at the talk page. Fences&Windows 22:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

::Thanks again. I will give them a BLP DS alert in case these are two different people. Hopefully that's enough for now. Politrukki (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. User:SteveBenassi, whom I reported earlier and whom gave a final warning about edit warring and ArbCom violations (and WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior, has begun to post very POV and forum-like material expressing his opinions across Talk pages (relating to Jews and Jewish history/origins in ways that seem to go against WP:NOTAFORUM). Previously, he intentionally made disruptive edits and edit warred in order to, by his admission, "make a scene" in order to push his POV.

Here is the earlier report I filed, in which User:NonReproBlue also participated (and where you warned SteveBenassi):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1067#User:SteveBenassi_WP:NOTHERE:_edit_warring/intentionally_disruptive_edits

Here are his recent edits to the Talk pages of three articles so far, first at Zionism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1024907542

And then at Italian Jews, here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1024971857

At Zionism, it seemed to be in response to a ref another user had added, but at Italian Jews it seemed to be for the purpose of calling attention to his opinion.

I warned him and removed his addition to the Talk page at Italian Jews, referring him to WP:POV and WP:NOTAFORUM but he has again posted similar material to the Talk page of Genetic studies on Jews, here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1024987807, this time initially pinging a user who (a while ago) edit warred (adding fringe material) and with whom I had an exchange. His notifying of them also seems somewhat like WP:CANVASSING, since he would know they would be likely to agree with him.

SteveBenassi has a history of making intentionally provacative edits (by his own admission) and edit warring on purpose. Here is seems to again be pushing a POV, and it seems that he is interested in adding this materials to articles that concern Jews or Jewish history. His recent behavior could also be an ArbCom violation (but I am not as familiar with that).

This seems to me problematic and disruptive, and indicates, like the edits he was reported for before, that he is WP:NOTHERE and attempting to right WP:GREATWRONGS. It is also strange in light of his earlier statement that he would no longer edit Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#Yardumian%2FSchurr).

Any attention to this issue is greatly appreciated.

Thank you, Skllagyook (talk) 03:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. User:Skllagyook You continue to try to block a new paper, The Geography of Jewish Ethnogenesis (2019), http://www.biblaridion.info/video/ethnogenesis.pdf , because it is opposite to your POV, and you try block my comments about it. I do not make edits on any pages now, I try to engage users on the talk section of the pages. I am trying to follow the "Please try to stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia". You don't like this paper and are still trying to suppress it. You do not like my analysis of this paper because it is anathema to your views. No one else is complaining but you three, who work as a team to block changes.

See ... search Benassi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zionism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Italian_Jews (deleted by Skllagyook)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Genetic_studies_on_Jews

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eran_Elhaik

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Oster

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eran_Elhaik

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Eran_Elhaik

SteveBenassi (talk) 03:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

::User:SteveBenassi I explained the issue with the paper repeatedly. The issue, as explained, is that it makes extraordinary claims strongly at odds with the mainstream (research both early and recent) and has received no engagement from the maimstrean (e.g. in the form of citations). This issue is not my personal opinions, and your repeated claim that it is (assuming bad faith) is less than appropriate (see WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:AGF. Adding variations of the same material accross Talk pages with your own POV, with headlines like "Are most modern day Jews or their ancestors indigenous to the Levant? The answer is no." (here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1024907542) and slanted, pov, and misleading descriptions of the "old" positions of "Ostrer and his camp" (here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1024987807), seems to suggest a battleground approach similar to that you admitted to in earlier instances (such as here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SteveBenassi#Edit_warring. Instead of editing the articles directly, you now seem to be posting opinionated material in the Talk pages designed to get others to make edits along the lines of those you prefer. Skllagyook (talk) 04:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Skllagyook Others disagree with your POV of me and my work, see RS debate ...

"I have read the paper of Yardumian and Schurr. It is a secondary source by two qualified authors published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The authors openly disagree with the conclusions drawn by some of the papers they review and give reasons for their disagreement; this is how science works and it isn't our business to take sides. I don't want to comment on exactly how it is used in articles, but I don't see the slightest reason to prohibit its use. Zerotalk 07:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Neutral editors please note that the use of this perfectly normal academic article is being edited out of several pages: not only at the Eran Elhaik page, which is crammed with references hostile to the author (in violation of wiki bio's NPOV policy) but also at the Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry here by Skllagyook, and then by User:Shrike (here and at Genetic studies on Jews here by Skllagyook, and at Jewish History here, again by Skllagyook.

It would appear in all four cases that Skllagyook has taken it upon himself to disallow a new perfectly normal piece of academic research to be cited for its conclusions anywhere on Wikipedia; That they do so because they are convinced the majority view is tantamount to the truth and not a contestable opinion. That is not only abusive POV pushing. It is outright censorship of any dissonant voice, one in this case, coming from perfectly respectable scholars. I.e. we have the extraordinary phenomenon of a peer-reviewed piece of scholarship suffering interdiction from appearing on Wikipedia because an editor has arrogated the right to step in an assume the mantle of ultimate judge on what can, and cannot be thought, about the topic. An editor of unknown background is acting as if they knew more about the topic of population statistics, genetics and Jewish history than the scholars who specialize in it or the peer-review committee who approved its publication on vetting it. Nishidani (talk) 08:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)"

You lost the RS debate and are still trying to suppress me and this paper, get over it, and leave me alone.

SteveBenassi (talk) 04:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

:::That was the opinion of Nishidani. But I was not the only one who thought the paper might be WP:UNDUE, and that, if used at all, should be incorporated only according to WP:WEIGHT (as it was in the criticism section of Eran Elhaik). Skllagyook (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

::::I've blocked SteveBenassi for 72 hours under Arbitration Enforcement. The post to Talk:Zionism breached ARBPIA. Fences&Windows 11:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

:::::So did the posts to the other pages, since they all contain the same statement:”Elhaik's paper was highly cited, it created a firestorm, many articles were written about it, because it threatens one of the justifications for Israel's right to exist in Palestine, DNA“. Even after being specifically told that these edits were a breach of sanctions he spammed it across multiple pages. I am genuinely curious why he is being cut so much slack, when it is abundantly clear that he is wp:nothere to build an encyclopedia. It would be different of he had a history of positive contributions, but literally the only edits he has ever made have been either to repeatedly insert his own original research (see his edits to wendigo) or inserting this specific rant about Elhaik’s work meaning Isreal has less of a right to exist (plus his rev-delled edits for “outing and off wiki harassment”) it seems like he is being given far too much leniency, and it is pretty much certain that as soon as this short block expires he will be right back at it. NonReproBlue (talk) 13:14, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

::::::NonReproBlue, I don't generally get involved in Arbitration Enforcement. I don't think a 72 hour block for talk page posts is lenient and if he returns to disruptive behaviour I am sure it will be dealt with. However, if you believe further action is needed, please go to WP:AE. Fences&Windows 13:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

:::::::I suppose that I wasn't thinking that it was solely under the purview of AE, as the ARBPIA violations are only a part of what I see as a very troubling larger pattern of WP:BATTLEGROUND WP:PROFRINGE and WP:NOTHERE behaviors, but I apologize for bothering you and and will take your advice if it persists.NonReproBlue (talk) 16:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

:::::::One last question; in their [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SteveBenassi&diff=1025076878&oldid=1025035750 unblock request] they said "Three Users of unknown background are consistently blocking me and others, Shrike, NonReproBlue, and Skllagyook. They are probably Israeli or Zionist trained SockPuppet civilians." What would be the appropriate noticeboard to bring this to? AE because of the content of the accusation, or general Incident board? Because this seems egregious to me. NonReproBlue (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.

:*Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)}}

Hi, can you renew the protection of the page "FOR TWO YEARS NOW" Sylvain Charlebois with ([Edit=Require extended confirmed access] like it was recently made in French to Sylvain Charlebois. The sockpuppet of Janvez is back again with the account {{u|Atkcp}} wich should be blocked too like [https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spécial:Contributions/Atkcp on French Wikipedia].

Note: A recent discussion on Talk:Sylvain Charlebois was recently added about that. Thank you.--CAQeux (talk) 23:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Trialpears

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AGK • Eliz81 • Mulad • ThaddeusB • Vianello • Who

:File:Pictogram voting rename.png {{noping|Lacrimosus}} → {{noping|Ikuzaf}}

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ragesoss

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AGK • DGG

File:Oversight logo.svg Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AGK

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.

:*An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)}}

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fences_and_windows&oldid=999310457#Regarding_my_Topic_Ban It has been six months]. What other information do you need? Kire1975 (talk) 16:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• Is there a formal process? You said I could come back to you after six months. Thank you in advance. Kire1975 (talk) 18:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:Sorry, Kire1975, I forgot to reply to your message here. Thanks for the reminder. To appeal [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1055#Kire1975 the topic ban], you need to go to WP:AN to ask for consensus for it to be lifted or modified. See WP:UNBAN for the policy. As this was a community ban I cannot unilaterally remove it. Fences&Windows 21:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

:: Hello again, I've been reluctant to appeal the block because I don't see a clear and specific block reason posted anywhere. Nothing was posted on my user talk page, and all it says on the block log is "See ANI" but I have not saved the ANI link before it disappeared from WP:ANI. Would you mind putting that notification on my talk page properly per WP:EXPLAINBLOCK? Thank you. Kire1975 (talk)

:::Of course. I had linked to the wording in my comment above, but I've now placed it on your talk page. Fences&Windows 13:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg BusterD

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Kees08 • Nickshanks • Protonk • Schissel • Ultraexactzz • Wknight94

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg TheresNoTime

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg TheresNoTime

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg ST47

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. ({{phabricator|T287380}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

:*You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)}}

A user with an IP 98.151.201.187 has been making nonsense edits on Saginaw Grant for the past day or two, a page for a Native American actor who has recently died. The user leaves no explanations and has now started reverting my undoings of his nonsense edits. After my experience with you blocking me last January, I won't dare try to get into an argument with anybody on any noticeboards or anything else. At the same time, this user has a history of vandalism and is being very disruptive and is now taking it to a page of a recently deceased person who is a beloved sacred elder/now ancestor in many communities. So my emotions are up. Can you please take a look at the edits this user made on this page and elsewhere and help me determine what to do next? Kire1975 (talk) 15:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

:Kire1975, I suggest you discuss this on their talk page so they understand what they're doing wrong. If they persist and appear to be vandalising/disruptive, go to WP:AIV. Fences&Windows 20:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

:: That would be sensible, but since it's an IP user, they don't have a talk page? Kire1975 (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

:::Kire1975, there's a talk page for each IP user: User talk:98.151.201.187. You can also explain in the edit summary and on the article talk, in case they miss the talk page comment. I think this user may be editing in good faith, but they appear confused and clumsy. Fences&Windows 21:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fences

I congratulate your coolness, and have a better opinon on you that months ago, but did you sent this same warning to Marquardtika? Because I believed a consensus was reached months ago, and this guy is the one that it´s breaking it. You yourself wrote the part that this guy is "objecting."

Look, I´m writing a book on the fraud done by CNN. You, wikipedians, could appear as heroes for the truth or manipulated yes men for them. Think about it, if you block me then I will appear not like a right wing conspiracy theorist trying to hack Wikipedia kind of guy, but a truth teller that CNN is scared to death to attemp to sue me for saying they comitted a fraud, that is being censored by you.

Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia editors love to appear like the good guys, right?

I will keep defending truth at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard. See you there. Tomoo Terada (talk) 02:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC) Tomoo Terada

''File:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history at :Chloe Melas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fences&Windows 03:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)''

:Please discuss this at Talk:Chloe Melas#BLP issues, User:Tomoo Terada. I am not going to block you, I'm an involved admin. I could see you were edit warring (and past three reverts in 24 hours so I gave you a templated warning to avoid you getting blocked by continuing and not realising the risk. Fences&Windows 20:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate your friendly warning Fences, but it´s true what I wrote you. I don´t have any fear of being blocked or even banned from here because as I already said to you and will keep saying it, some people here obviously are owned by Chloe Melas. If they were already bought by her, any reason will not change "their" decision. Tomoo Terada (talk) 02:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC) Tomoo Terada

Sir, I got your reference from User:Hatchens on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hatchens#Recently_AfC_comment] regarding on a draft, which I want to produce it on a wiki page. But it was neglected 2 times due to unreliable resources. Bu I gave those reference which are some reliable and few Independent. Please look into my draft and Please give some advice where I can fix this. I even don't if there is any Indian origin to review it. But no offense. Please ping me.Jyoti Roy (talk) 05:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

The draft is Draft:Anubrato Mandol.Jyoti Roy (talk) 05:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Jake Wartenberg

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Emperor • Viridian Bovary

:File:Pictogram voting rename.png {{noping|Ashleyyoursmile}} → {{noping|Viridian Bovary}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.

:*A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.

:*A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)

:*A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

:*The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Blablubbs

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Alvestrand • Black Falcon • Deathphoenix • Dppowell • Mark Arsten • JGHowes (deceased)

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Callanecc

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Mkdw

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Galobtter

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:* Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.

:*Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under {{myprefs|Beta features}}.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.

:*Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.

:*The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

:* Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.

:*The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)}}

Hi, a page that you deleted is "Operation Swift Retort Film" because of G4, can u please restore it or move it to draft so I can make it references? I have now 3 top newspapers references from last month so that will come in handy.

--Static Hash (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

:Hi Static Hash, I've restored it at User:Static Hash/Operation Swift Retort (film). Please ensure the issues raised at AfD are fully addressed. Please check with me, the deleting admin, or go via WP:DRV before moving to articlespace. Fences&Windows 15:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, admin, I think it's not notable at this time.

--Static Hash (talk) 17:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

:Hi Static Hash, shall I delete it again? The sources you added either didn't mention the film or were by the filmmaker so cannot be used. We can document polemical or propaganda films, but we must not ourselves convey their message. The writing was not neutral and left out critical reception from at least two reviews. Fences&Windows 17:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes sir you can delete it, thanks for your precious time.

--Static Hash (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Clpo13

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Brian0918 • JDoorjam • Karanacs • MrDarcy • Mindspillage

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Evad37

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Dreamy Jazz • Ferret • GeneralNotability • Girth Summit • RoySmith

File:Oversight logo.png Oversight changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Dreamy Jazz • LuK3

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:* Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at [https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/ https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/].

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*{{noping|GeneralNotability}}, {{noping|Mz7}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. {{noping|Ivanvector}} and {{noping|John M Wolfson}} are reserve commissioners.

:*Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

:*The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)}}

You might want to take a look at this fellow too. He shows up in most of the places user:CappellsFromSkelmersdale has in the last two days with inane deletion remarks, and the contribs suggest a compromised account or something. Mangoe (talk) 18:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Why not talk to me first? Of seem to think that anyone who disagrees with you should be ran off. Please try to communicate with me first next time.Super (talk) 19:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

:Super, I also noticed your account but I concluded that there was no immediate indication of a concern. Mangoe's skepticism comes because accounts that return after a long absence with a burst of activity in a new area are often compromised or disruptive.

:You seem interested in AfD and have joined the ARS, but please note the ARS is controversial (there have been recent sanctions for certain members due to disruption). You may want to observe AfD and DRV for a while before contributing so extensively so you get a feel for the norms. A few well-researched comments are more valuable than many drive-by !votes. Fences&Windows 22:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I just retired and am filling my free time. I wish more editors were as polite as you.Super (talk) 23:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:* Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. ({{phab|T284642}})

:* The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. ({{phab|T293866}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:* Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).

:* The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)}}

How do you handle a editor who apparently had a hatred for pornography and is attempting to delete as many article as he can? An example can be seen here [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devon_(actress)] There is zero reason for an AfD. If you have time I would love advice on how to proceed. Another user mentioned a topic ban? Super (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

:Super, as you've already gone to AN/I then I think my advice is mainly moot. I think the AN/I post was premature: you've not gathered sufficient evidence of bias or a need for a topic ban. You need to be quite forensic and specific in presenting your case - shows diffs, quotes, examples.

:My advice for AfD is always to search for more and better sources rather than focusing on the present state of the article. This is not easy in the field of pornography, but is still necessary. Editors nominating porn bios for deletion are often motivated by BLP concerns, because these articles can attract editors who want to add real names and other private information and the sourcing to porn industry sources is often promotional and low quality. Fences&Windows 11:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Amalthea • Ihcoyc (deceased) • Kateshortforbob • Kirill Lokshin • Rifleman 82 • Ryan Norton • Wrp103

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Mr. Stradivarius

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Opabinia regalis

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Opabinia regalis

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

• Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: {{Noping|Beeblebrox}}, {{Noping|Cabayi}}, {{Noping|Donald Albury}}, {{Noping|Enterprisey}}, {{Noping|Izno}}, {{Noping|Opabinia regalis}}, {{Noping|Worm That Turned}}, {{Noping|Wugapodes}}.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The functionaries email list ({{NonSpamEmail|functionaries-en|lists.wikimedia.org}}) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AustralianRupert • Cimon Avaro • Euryalus • Jehochman • Nunh-huh

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg 28bytes

File:Wikipedia bureaucrat.svg Bureaucrat changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg 28bytes

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Evad37 • Galobtter

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ragesoss

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.

:*The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.

:*The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).

:*A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

:*Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically [https://meta.toolforge.org/accounteligibility/61 check your eligibility] to vote.

:*Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)}}

I saw that you are one of admins willing to provide copies of deleted articles. In the event that List of feature films with LGBT characters is deleted (which is a distinct possibility), would you be willing to provide a copy of that article, after the deletion of that page, so the content can then be used on other pages on here? That would be very helpful. Thanks. --Historyday01 (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

:Historyday01, yes, I would. I doubt from a quick skim it'll be deleted, but I'll probably comment on the debate tomorrow. Fences&Windows 23:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

::Ok, thanks. --Historyday01 (talk) 00:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Modussiccandi

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg BOZ • Brookie (deceased) • Jackmcbarn • Jamesday • Jonathunder • Master of Puppets • Saravask

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

:*A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.

:*A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

:*The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. ({{phab|T296645}})

:*Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. ({{phab|T25020}})

:*The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. ({{phab|T295389}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

:*Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

:* The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.

:* Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.

:*The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)}}

Hi - I don’t think our paths have crossed to date. I see you’re the major author of the William Jacques article. I’m interested in the connection between Jacques and the Read School, Drax. Our article states he was head boy, but I’m struggling to find an RS that confirms this. Do you happen to have one? Thanks and regards. KJP1 (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

:Hi, KJP1 - good question! That was added a decade ago by an IP editor: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Jacques&diff=prev&oldid=499369595. Unfortunately, I didn't notice it wasn't sourced. I can't verify it (I checked the school website too), so I've removed it. Fences&Windows 21:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

::Thanks for getting back so promptly. I think that is best for now, although I actually think it’s true. I’ll continue to look for a source, and I’ve posted the question on the school’s Talkpage. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 04:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Firefly • Sdrqaz

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ad Orientem

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Geschichte • Ryan Postlethwaite • Sabine's Sunbird • Wassupwestcoast

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Evad37

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. ({{phab|T301928}})
• When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. ({{phab|T284114}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• {{section link|Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Opening_of_proceedings}} has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
• A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
• A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the [https://wikimediafoundation.org/role/board/ Wikimedia Foundation Board] will now review the guidelines.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)}}

{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

}}

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Things were really getting out of hand at Neil Parish. Appreciate the quick response and cleanup. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm not going to alter the duration of the protection on Neil Parish, but I would have preferred that you discussed with me if you disagreed with the duration of the protection I put in place before reducing it. Mjroots (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

:Honest error Mjroots, I thought it was only move protected and saw it needed quick action. I'll restore duration. Fences&Windows 15:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

::OK, fair enough. I've just created an edit notice, so hopefully the level of vandalism will now drop. Mjroots (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Colin M

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg David.Monniaux • Fribbler • Grue • Kpjas • West.andrew.g

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ks0stm

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ks0stm

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
• Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
• A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Tamzin

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Barek • Darkwind • Geometry guy • ProcseeBot • RoyBoy • Sean Whitton • Valereee • Visorstuff • WAvegetarian

:File:Pictogram voting rename.png {{noping|Sn0wflake}} → {{noping|VersedFenrir}}

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ivanvector

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. ({{phab|T307341}})
• The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under {{myprefs|Beta features}}. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
• An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)}}

Hey there, I'm writing here to ask whether you could maybe protect Dragon Group again as you did in December 2020. There have been several cases of badly-veiled tendentious editing there over the last month and it's getting pretty tiring to keep up with it. Zarasophos (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

:Sorry I didn't see this sooner, Zarasophos, it has now been done by another admin. Fences&Windows 08:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

::No problem! Thanks for the response. Zarasophos (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AA • Gwalla • Ioeth • Laurascudder • Moriori (deceased) • Nat • Rfl

:File:Pictogram voting rename.png {{noping|Drilnoth}} → {{noping|AFigureOfBlue}}

File:Wikipedia bureaucrat.svg Bureaucrat changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Lee Vilenski

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Nihiltres

{{Col-end}}

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. ({{phab|T130439}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• An arbitration case regarding conduct in deletion-related editing has been opened.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Valereee

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • Capitalistroadster • Samsara

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
• An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
• Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
• Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
• Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold {{key|shift}} between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg DanCherek • DatGuy • Femke • Z1720

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Aldux • Graham Beards • Nyttend

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Mr. Stradivarius

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
• An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
• The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please email Madalina Ana.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
• The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
• Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg ScottishFinnishRadish

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Staxringold

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ahoerstemeier (deceased) • Ched

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Cyberpower678

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg GorillaWarfare

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the Arbitration Committee, a checkuser or an oversighter for action (as applicable, per ArbCom's recent updated guidance) instead of the administrator making the block.
• Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
• Community comment on the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines is requested until 8 October.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to {{myprefs|Gadgets}} and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
• A modification to the deletion RfC remedy in the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.
• The second phase of the 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review closes 3 October.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their passwords are secure, and reminded that ArbCom reserves the right to not restore adminship in cases of poor account security. You can also use two-factor authentication (2FA) to provide an extra level of security.
• Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections open 2 October and close 8 October.
• You are invited to comment on candidates in the 2022 CUOS appointments process.
• An RfC is open to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.
• Tech tip: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at Special:Undelete.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• The article creation at scale RfC opened on 3 October and will be open until at least 2 November.
• An RfC is open to discuss having open requests for adminship automatically placed on hold after the seven-day period has elapsed, pending closure or other action by a bureaucrat.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 13 November 2022 until 22 November 2022 to stand in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The arbitration case request titled Athaenara has been resolved by motion.
• The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has entered the proposed decision stage.
• {{noping|AmandaNP}}, {{noping|Mz7}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee Elections. {{noping|Xaosflux}} and {{noping|Dr vulpes}} are reserve commissioners.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The 2022 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of two new CheckUsers.
• You can add yourself to the centralised page listing time zones of administrators.
• Tech tip: Wikimarkup in a block summary is parsed in the notice that the blockee sees. You can use templates with custom options to specify situations like {{tlx|rangeblock|2=create=yes}} or {{tlx|uw-ublock|2=contains profanity}}.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)}}

{{ombox

| name = Happy Adminship

| image = 50px

| imageright = 50px

| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, Honeydew 30%, Honeydew 70%, AliceBlue);

| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;

| plainlinks = yes

| text = Happy adminship anniversary!
Hi Fences and windows! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=rights&page=User%3AFences+and+windows successful request for adminship]. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
• The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
• An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. ({{phab|T319449}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
• The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
• The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
• The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
• A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add /64 to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)}}

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Daesun jinrihoe emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: {{Noping|Barkeep49}}, {{Noping|CaptainEek}}, {{Noping|GeneralNotability}}, {{Noping|Guerillero}}, {{Noping|L235}}, {{Noping|Moneytrees}}, {{Noping|Primefac}}, {{Noping|SilkTork}}.
• The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
• The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
• Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using [https://bullseye.toolforge.org/ bullseye] which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)}}

Hi. I am Prerna Gupta. A couple years ago I proposed some improvements to the page about me following COI policy and you chipped in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Prerna_Gupta#Draft_by_subject here]. An anonymous IP address recently added some content I think is redundant, promotional, and copy/paste of copyrighted content. I was hoping you would be willing to chip-in again at the discussion I started [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Prerna_Gupta#Recent_edits here]. 138.118.80.34 (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Gimmetrow

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Bjelleklang

|Bob the Wikipedian

|Leithp

|WhisperToMe

|100 inactive admins

}}

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|BDD

|Bradv

|Donald Albury

|Maxim

|MusikAnimal

}}

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|BDD

|Bradv

|Donald Albury

|Maxim

}}

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
• Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
• In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically [https://meta.toolforge.org/accounteligibility/67 check your eligibility] to vote.
• Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
• Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg The Wordsmith

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Fuhghettaboutit

|Spinningspark (deceased)

}}

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Callanecc

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Callanecc

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
• Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
• A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
• The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
• A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
• Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
• The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a {{tq|[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing}}. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Aoidh

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg KillerChihuahua

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ferret

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. ({{phab|T178356}})
• The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
• A link to the user's {{#special:CentralAuth}} page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on {{#special:Contributions}}. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
• A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Spicy

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Ale jrb

|Dbachmann

|DGG (deceased)

|Jimbo Wales

}}

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Jimbo Wales

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Jimbo Wales

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ingenuity

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Ddstretch

|Prodego

|Resolute

}}

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Courcelles

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
• As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to {{noping|Jimbo Wales}}.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)}}

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sahelanthropus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Durbin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Novem Linguae

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Deckiller

|Electionworld

|MBisanz

|Penwhale

|Raul654

|Roadrunner

|Viridae

|Yannismarou

}}

File:Wikipedia bureaucrat.svg Bureaucrat changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg MBisanz

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)}}

Hi Fences and Windows. A few months ago, you chipped in on the Prerna Gupta page, where I disclosed that I am the article-subject. I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APrerna_Gupta&diff=1142498908&oldid=1133607877 followed up] with a post asking about incorporating my nickname as "the queen of viral apps", per independent media articles. I wanted to circle back to see if you had a minute to evaluate the citations provided and see if the addition was justified. Prernagupta1 (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Firefangledfeathers

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|AlisonW

|Amberrock

|Closedmouth

|Scottywong

}}

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Novem Linguae

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. ({{phab|T334338}})
• Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. ({{phab|T337431}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
• The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

{{Col-begin}}

{{Col-2}}

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Pppery

|Theleekycauldron

}}

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Dwheeler

|G.A.S

|Royalbroil

|Ssd

}}

{{Col-2}}

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Bradv

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Bradv

{{Col-end}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
• A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that {{tq|[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment}}.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. ({{phab|T324166}})

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming {{tq|local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus}}. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to {{tq|note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful}}.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg 0xDeadbeef

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Tamzin

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Dennis Brown

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Pppery

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Ragesoss

|TheresNoTime

}}

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
• There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
• {{noping|Xaosflux}}, {{noping|RoySmith}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. {{noping|BusterD}} is the reserve commissioner.
• Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
• Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
• Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
• Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
• An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)}}

As per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate_notification Appropriate Notification], as you are "an editor who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics)", you are hereby alerted that the topic of Annie Altman's accusations against her brother have come back up on Talk:Sam_Altman#Sister's_tweets. This completes alerting all previous members of the conversation who are not currently active (except the one who is blocked), as the others are currently active. -- 85.220.29.158 (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

{{ombox

| name = Happy Adminship

| image = 50px

| imageright = 50px

| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, Honeydew 30%, Honeydew 70%, AliceBlue);

| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;

| plainlinks = yes

| text = Happy adminship anniversary!
Hi Fences and windows! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=rights&page=User%3AFences+and+windows successful request for adminship]. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

}}

While I intend to clean this up, reduce commentary on Shen Buhai and instead straighten out a Han dynasty history, I explain the problem with Fajia/Chinese Legalism here. I hope that you will take a look at it to clarify the matter for you. The problem is not that I don't know my subject at this point. The problem is that I do know my subject. There are distinctions that I can articulate, but they are fine.FourLights (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_of_Names

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
• The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
• Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

----

{{Center|{{Flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: {{Noping|Aoidh}}, {{Noping|Cabayi}}, {{Noping|Firefly}}, {{Noping|HJ Mitchell}}, {{Noping|Maxim}}, {{Noping|Sdrqaz}}, {{Noping|ToBeFree}}, {{Noping|Z1720}}.
• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
• The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)}}