Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANobii

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems to have become better referenced since AfD nomination, and no consensus to delete. Canley (talk) 04:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

=[[ANobii]]=

{{ns:0|w}}

:{{la|ANobii}} – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:WEB, previously prod'd and I never noticed. Taking it to AfD. Notability hasn't been established per the guidelines.Crossmr (talk) 00:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep Looks like it could be expanded. Google search turns up quite a few results. If someone put some diligence into it, the article could easily be expanded. Timmehcontribs 01:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

:*Are any of them reliable sources independent of the subject which provide significant coverage? That is the problem here. Expansion isn't the issue. The issue is simply a lack of sources provided which establish notability. All we require are two sources which clearly meet the guidelines above, if those are provided, expanded or not, we have notability established. --Crossmr (talk) 02:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep Looks decent enough. GlassCobra 04:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  • :Would you care to qualify that? Can you demonstrate which sources help it meet WP:WEB?--Crossmr (talk) 04:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Not quite sure whether the articles from [http://www.zdnetasia.com/blog/web2/0,39063521,61978896,00.htm this web site] meet WP:WEB since I am not familiar with foreign mass media.--Knuckmew (talk) 02:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  • :If it can be established that zdnet affords its blogs the same editorial oversight that it affords its articles, then yes thats a good source.--Crossmr (talk) 04:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 03:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.