Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimer c'est tout donner

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Eddie891 Talk Work 06:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Aimer c'est tout donner]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Aimer c'est tout donner}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Aimer c'est tout donner}})

Album fails WP:NALBUM, a cursory search does not help either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  • keep per WP:NALBUM#2 as this has been on the charts in at least three countries FR, CH, BE [https://lescharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Natasha+St%2DPier&titel=Th%E9r%E8se+de+Lisieux+%2D+Aimer+c%27est+tout+donner&cat=a] reaching a top position of 23 in France. --hroest 14:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
  • keep The singer herself has a level of notoriety in the francophone world that probably would make even the most obscure production notable. Superboilles (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

:Why says so? Other sources must decide that, not any one Wikipedia user. Geschichte (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment: From NALBUM: "All articles on albums or other recordings should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Where is the coverage? Geschichte (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Redirect, however if reliable sources that show third part independent coverage I will reconsider the vote. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep: I found two good sources with SIGCOV (one already was on the wiki page): [https://www.franceinfo.fr/culture/musique/chanson-francaise/natasha-st-pier-de-retour-avec-les-textes-de-sainte-therese-de-lisieux_3287299.html] and [https://www.proquest.com/docview/1662848897/65AD4F149F6E41EBPQ/1?sourcetype=Newspapers]. ProQuest has more results but I don't have full access to confirm their usefulness. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 16:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: To have a discussion on whether it is a redirect or a keep per policies for a clear consensus and to evaluate sources shared above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HilssaMansen19 (talk) 10:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep: WP:NALBUM says an album is notable if it has appeared on any country's national music chart. lescharts.com is listed in WP:GOODCHARTS as a reliable charting source. It was also certified gold in France (also a WP:NALBUM guideline). — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:08, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep: This article has been significantly improved since I nominated it and the editor has made it clearer on why they think NALBUM is met, and I agree with them; the gold certification coupled with the national chart (all which the article wasn't representing as of my nomination), is sufficient NALBUM pass for me. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep per hroest. Cultural impact as measured by chart positions and gold certification is a form of notability. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 06:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.