Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Folkloric Witchcraft

:{{la|American Folkloric Witchcraft}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/American_Folkloric_Witchcraft Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|American Folkloric Witchcraft}})

Fails WP:GNG. Nothing found to indicate notability whatsoever. Only blogs and other non-reliable sources. I don't believe that any of the CSD criteria fit for this particular topic so I brought it here instead. Majora (talk) 23:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

::Speedy Delete It's kinda embarrassing we even have to have this conversation. One source, their blog. Not trying to soapbox as this isn't the venue, but seems this is a great example of an exploitable hole in our CSD policy. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

:Delete: Google Scholar and Google News search reveal no mention of the topic. The only source for the article is the organization's own blog. I poked around it a little, but I couldn't find a "news" or "media" page. On the "About us" page, there's no mention of membership or involvement in the broader community. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 23:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

• Delete No evidence of notability. There might be a reasonable argument for speedy deletion under CSD A-11 and/or CSD G-11. This looks a lot like promotion of something the author(s) cooked up. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete this is not a real topic of interest in folklore,. Should be removed. User:smithriedel
• Delete per above. It might also be useful to delete {{la|American Folkloric Tradition}}, which is the original location of this article's content and currently stands as an unlikely redirect to Folklore. Daß Wölf 01:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

::Good suggestion. I've sent it to RfD. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

• Delete This is promotional, and the GNG isn't met. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete As unmitigated tripe. Non-notable blog musings. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 22:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SNOW. Why wait? Not worth a redirect to Cochrane's Craft, since it is only tangential. --Bejnar (talk) 22:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, non-verifiable. --Lockley (talk) 05:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.