Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annius Rufus

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Annius Rufus}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Annius Rufus}})

Only one source, nowhere close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner (talk) 13:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism, Israel, and Palestine. Skynxnex (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep - One of a series of notable Romans being nominated for deletion by this edtor. See my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gessius Florus. Treated in very many journal articles and similar. Scholar has 608 hits to sift through [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Annius+Rufus%22] and also treated in a very great number of books. Here's just one. [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Imperial_Mines_and_Quarries_in_the_Roman/nlTq36p-XmEC?hl=en&gbpv=0]. The page needs work but deletion is not for cleanup. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Improper nomination. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep. A weaker case than some of the other governors of Judaea, but there's likely potential for expansion. The lack of material on him isn't due to his being non-notable, but due to a paucity of records about his administration, due either to the nature of record-keeping and history during this period, or the loss of material over the passage of time. These don't demonstrate a lack of notability; just a lack of detail about a presumptively notable person. P Aculeius (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep, let's not create a damaging break in the sequence of Roman governors just because there is less information on one of them. Notability is obvious, and there are more sources than are currently used. Zero^talk 00:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

:Keep per User talk:Serrwinner #Roman AfDs, this is a pointy nomination of a clearly notable subject. FortunateSons (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.