Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Qafë Prush

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Battle of Qafë Prush]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Battle of Qafë Prush}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Battle of Qafë Prush}})

THis was a minor skirmsih. Slatersteven (talk) 11:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

:there are ALOT of minor skirmish and this is more some sort of Attack on KLA fighters killing one of the notable generals and wounding two others Unknown General17 (talk) 11:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

::Yes, that is the point, there are lots of minor skirmishes, in all wars. We do not generally have articles on them. Slatersteven (talk) 12:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

:::There are alot small ambushes that are kept which didn't do anything in war Unknown General17 (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

:Comment It being a minor skirmish isn't a reason in itself for deletion. A, few, other, examples. What matters is notability. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 12:56, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

::But this does not seem to pass wp:n. Slatersteven (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

::5 sources. 4 of which look to be reprints. Slatersteven (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

:::If i add like 1-2 new sources will you remove the thing for deletion? Unknown General17 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

::::That would all depends on on the quality of the sources and the coverage. Slatersteven (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::Added 2 new sources, one Albanian and other is from Kosovo site on Serbian language Unknown General17 (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::Both trivial mentions, about a person. Notability is not inherited. We need sources to establish THE BATTLE in and of itself is notable. Slatersteven (talk) 10:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::::I understand that battle isn't notable but it shouldn't be deleted Unknown General17 (talk) 06:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::::If it is not notable (as you now admit) it fails wp:n. Slatersteven (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

:Keep sources show the battle being a topic that is covered.. it is also notable because it is where KLA fighter Luan Haradinaj was killed. There are many articles about the war in same style that were created which are not maybe major but which are listed as KLA or Albanian victory like Anadrinë offensive, Surkis ambush. Battle of Rezalla (1997), Battle of Jezerc, Battle of Hajla Pass, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.55.28 (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

::Anadrinë offensive and Battle of Jezerc started the "frontal-war" in their respective regions; Anadrinë offensive for the Paštrik and Anadrinë region while Battle of Jezerc for the Ferizaj and Neredimë region. Battle of Rezalla was the first large-scale battle of the entire Kosovo conflict so for "Kosovo War-standards" they are pretty notable. For Battle of Hajla Pass there is currently a discussion and Surkis ambush is minor and has also been nominated. Peja mapping (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:::We are here to discuss this article, not any others. Slatersteven (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

::::Apologies. Peja mapping (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete failsWP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :If it fails General notability then alright but I don't think there is reason for deletion Unknown General17 (talk) 07:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:GNG; the only thing worth noting was Luan Haradinaj's death, and the events are already covered on his article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :So it only fails WP:GNG? No need for deletion? Unknown General17 (talk) 06:13, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::If it is not notable it is OK to have an article on it? Have you actually read GNG? 11:54, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:42, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.