Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beacon (signal fire)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Beacon#For defensive communications (historical). plicit 12:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Beacon (signal fire)]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Beacon (signal fire)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Beacon (signal fire)}})

The article Beacon (signal fire) duplicates information already covered in the Beacon article and exists entirely within its scope. The majority of the page is entirely unsourced, other than two WP:Self-published sources within popular culture. Lea 4545 (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

::The beacon article is too broad. The early warning system has its own Wikidata object. The idea with it is to port over relevant information from beacon and instead describe it shortly in the main beacon article with a link to the specific subarticle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blockhaj (talkcontribs) 08:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Redirect is reasonable and appropriate. Bearian (talk) 23:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.