Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BerkeleyLive.Net

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @135 · 02:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[BerkeleyLive.Net]]=

:{{la|BerkeleyLive.Net}} ([{{fullurl:BerkeleyLive.Net|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BerkeleyLive.Net}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable forum, absolutely fails the criteria at WP:WEB. Drawn Some (talk) 14:32, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete agree per nomination. Might warrant a brief mention on the university's article but certainly not its own article. --Oscarthecat (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete - no more notable than its counterparts at a myriad campuses around the planet. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Merge into the main article.DGG (talk) 23:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable web forum. WWGB (talk) 09:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I wonder why every single aspect/entity of a University is considered a good topic for an encyclopedia article? What's next, articles on autoclave systems? The footbridges of University of Wisconsin-Madison? Abductive (talk) 20:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.