Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda M. Saiz
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 02:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Brenda M. Saiz]]=
:{{la|1=Brenda M. Saiz}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Brenda M. Saiz}})
This subject does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NJUDGE as a failed judicial nominee. Perhaps redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies? Let'srun (talk) 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Law, and New Mexico. Let'srun (talk) 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NJUDGE. Would not redirect because her failed nomination wasn't a controversy. Otherwise, there would be some reporting on her. Longhornsg (talk) 07:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete I could find three non-govermental sources: [https://www.abqjournal.com/news/local/two-nominees-for-nm-judgeships-rated-highly/article_785dacbe-7f70-5345-9b38-11e1344a6685.html Albuquerque Journal], [https://cdllife.com/2020/trump-nominates-trucking-attorney-for-federal-district-court-seat/ CDLife], [https://lawandcrime.com/judiciary/president-trump-names-two-more-judicial-nominees-heres-what-we-know-about-them/ Law and Crime]. I'd describe all three of these sources as borderline - reputable-looking local paper, trade press, and a kind of sensationalist-looking crime-focused newspaper.
:Rusalkii (talk) 04:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.