Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies

Trump made 46 nominations for federal judgeships that were not confirmed by the Senate. Of these, 6 were withdrawn by President Trump, 32 expired at an adjournment of the Senate, and 8 were withdrawn by President Joe Biden after he took office.

Supreme Court of the United States

• Neil Gorsuch (of Colorado): Trump announced the nomination of Gorsuch on January 31, 2017. The nomination was formally transmitted to the Senate on February 1, 2017.{{Cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2017/2/1/senate-section/article/S607-2|title=Congressional Record Senate Articles|website=congress.gov}} Judge Gorsuch's confirmation hearings started on March 20, 2017, and lasted four days.{{cite news |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/gorsuch-confirmation-hearing-set-for-march-20-235084 |title=Gorsuch confirmation hearing set for March 20 |last=Kim|first=Seung Min|date=February 16, 2017|work=Politico}}{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nomination-of-the-honorable-neil-m-gor|title=United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=March 20, 2017 |access-date=March 21, 2017}} On April 3, the Judiciary Committee approved Gorsuch by an 11–9 vote.{{cite news|last1=Flegenheimer|first1=Matt|title=Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Gorsuch in Party-Line Vote|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/us/politics/gorsuch-confirmation.html|access-date=April 4, 2017|work=The New York Times|date=April 3, 2017}}{{cite magazine|last1=Berenson|first1=Tessa|title=Senate Judiciary Committee Just Approved Neil Gorsuch's Nomination |url=https://time.com/4723448/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-vote-senate/ |access-date=April 4, 2017|magazine=Time|date=April 3, 2017}} During the last day of committee hearings, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) announced from the Senate floor that he would filibuster the nomination.{{cite news|last1=Matt Flegenheimer|last2=Charlie Savage|last3=Adam Liptak|title=Democrats Plan to Filibuster to Thwart Gorsuch Nomination|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/us/politics/democrats-filibuster-neil-gorsuch-nomination.html|access-date=April 8, 2017|work=The New York Times|date=March 24, 2017|page=A17|author2-link=Charlie Savage (author)|author3-link=Adam Liptak}} Democratic opposition focused primarily on the complaint that the vacancy on the court was created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia during President Barack Obama's administration, and therefore should have been filled by President Obama's nominee for the vacancy, Judge Merrick Garland.{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2017/02/01/512751609/why-gorsuchs-nomination-is-likely-to-play-out-as-an-angry-partisan-battle |title=Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Is Going To Face An Angry, Partisan Senate Battle|work=NPR|date=March 30, 2016|access-date=February 1, 2017}}{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/us/politics/supreme-court-nominees-trump.html|title=A Supreme Court Pick Is Promised. A Political Brawl Is Certain.|first1=Michael D.|last1=Shear|first2=Adam|last2=Liptak|date=January 24, 2017|access-date=February 1, 2017|work=The New York Times}} In response, Republicans hearkened back to November 2013 when Democrats invoked the nuclear option to fill three vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/senate-approves-nuclear-option-fight-gorsuch-supreme-court/story?id=46608672|title=Senate OKs 'nuclear option,' clears path for high court nomination vote|date=April 6, 2017|website=ABC News}} To counter the filibuster, Republicans invoked the nuclear option, ending debate with a simple majority vote and extending the rule that a simple majority could invoke cloture on all presidential nominations, including Supreme Court nominations.{{cite news|last=Killough|first=Ashley |url=https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/senate-nuclear-option-neil-gorsuch/index.html |title=GOP triggers nuclear option on Neil Gorsuch nomination |work=CNN Politics|access-date=April 7, 2017}} The Senate confirmed Gorsuch on April 7, 2017 by a 54–45 vote, with all Senate Republicans present voting to confirm along with three Democratic senators from states that voted heavily for Trump: Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), and Joe Donnelly (D-IN).{{cite news|last1=Adam Liptak|last2=Matt Flegenheimer|title=Neil Gorsuch Confirmed by Senate as Supreme Court Justice|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/us/politics/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court.html|access-date=April 8, 2017|work=The New York Times|date=April 8, 2017|page=A1|author1-link=Adam Liptak}}
• Brett Kavanaugh (of Maryland): Trump announced the nomination of Kavanaugh in July 2018. The nomination was formally transmitted to the Senate on July 10, 2018. Widespread opposition to his nomination emerged within the Democratic Caucus after allegations emerged that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted fellow student Christine Blasey Ford back when he was in high school. The Senate would go on to confirm Kavanaugh on October 6, 2018, by a 50–48 vote. Except for Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), all Senate Republicans voted to confirm Kavanaugh and except for Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), all Senate Democrats opposed him. Murkowski announced her opposition to Kavanaugh, but instead of voting no, she voted present in order to pair her vote with Senator Steve Daines (R-MT), who was attending his daughter's wedding.{{cite news|last=Sheryl Gay Stolberg|title=Kavanaugh Is Sworn In After Close Confirmation Vote in Senate|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court.html|access-date=October 7, 2018|work=The New York Times|date=October 6, 2018|page=A1}}
• Amy Coney Barrett (of Indiana): On September 26, 2020, weeks before the 2020 presidential election, Trump nominated Barrett to fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.{{cite news |first1=Steve |last1=Holland |first2=Lawrence |last2=Hurley |first3=Andrew |last3=Chung |title=Trump announces 'brilliant' conservative judge Barrett as Supreme Court pick |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-trump/trump-announces-brilliant-conservative-judge-barrett-as-supreme-court-pick-idUSKBN26H0GI |work=Reuters |date=26 September 2020 |access-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926214309/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-trump/trump-announces-brilliant-conservative-judge-barrett-as-supreme-court-pick-idUSKBN26H0GI |url-status=live}} On October 26, 2020, the United States Senate confirmed her nomination by a 52–48 vote.{{Cite web|first=Veronica|last=Rocha|date=2020-10-26|title=Live updates: Amy Coney Barrett Senate confirmation vote|url=https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/amy-coney-barrett-senate-confirmation-vote/index.html|access-date=2020-10-27|website=CNN|language=en}} Democrats rebuked Republicans for violating the precedent they established in 2016 when they refused to consider Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland more than nine months before the end of his term.{{cite news |last1=Fandos |first1=Nicholas |title=The Senate confirms Barrett on a nearly party-line vote, delivering a win to Trump that tips the Supreme Court to the right. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/26/us/trump-biden-election/the-senate-confirms-barrett-on-a-nearly-party-line-vote-delivering-a-win-to-trump-that-tips-the-supreme-court-to-the-right |access-date=27 October 2020 |work=The New York Times |date=27 October 2020}} The 35 days between the nomination and the presidential election marked the shortest period of time between a nomination to the Supreme Court and an election in U.S. history.{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/politics/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court.html|title=Trump selects Amy Coney Barrett to fill Ginsburg's seat on the Supreme Court|first1=Peter|last1=Baker|first2=Maggie|last2=Haberman|work=The New York Times|date=2020-09-25|access-date=2020-09-27|archive-date=September 25, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200925214023/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/politics/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court.html|url-status=live}}

• Raúl M. Arias-Marxuach (of Puerto Rico): On November 13, 2020, Trump announced his intent to nominate Arias-Marxuach, a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, to serve as a United States circuit judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, to the seat vacated by Judge Juan R. Torruella, who died on October 26, 2020; the nomination was sent to the Senate on November 30, 2020.{{Cite press release |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-111320/ |title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees |date=November 13, 2020 |via=National Archives |work=whitehouse.gov}}{{Cite press release |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/four-nominations-sent-senate-113020/ |title=Four Nominations Sent to the Senate |via=National Archives |work=whitehouse.gov }} The nomination was considered controversial, as Trump had already lost the 2020 presidential election to Joe Biden when he announced it, although Arias-Marxuach himself was not controversial. Although he received a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on December 16, 2020, no further action on his nomination was taken due to Republican Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham's opposition to processing the nomination out of committee during the lame-duck session of the 116th Congress.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/12/16/2020/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|first=Raúl Arias-Marxuach to be United States Circuit Judge for the First Circuit|last=PN2366-116|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=December 16, 2020 }}{{cite web|url=https://www.rollcall.com/2020/12/18/with-calendar-winding-down-gop-makes-case-for-trump-judicial-pick-in-the-117th-congress/|title=With calendar winding down, GOP makes case for Trump judicial pick in the 117th Congress|publisher=Roll Call|last=Cioffi|first=Chris|date=December 18, 2020|accessdate=May 24, 2021}} This resulted in the nomination's expiration at the end of the 116th Congress on January 3, 2021, upon which it was returned to the President, pursuant to Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the rules of the Senate; later that same day, his renomination to the same seat was sent to the Senate.{{Cite web |date=2021-01-03 |title=PN2366 - Nomination of Raul M. Arias-Marxuach for The Judiciary, 116th Congress (2019-2020) |url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/2366 |access-date=2021-01-05 |website=congress.gov}}{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/thirty-nominations-sent-senate/|title=Thirty Nominations Sent to the Senate |via=National Archives |work=whitehouse.gov}} However, before the Senate could act upon the nomination and despite the outgoing Trump administration and Graham's attempts to invoke "senatorial courtesy" and recommend to President Biden—who took office on January 20—that he maintain Arias-Marxuach's renomination in the 117th Congress in light of the nominees's qualifications and drawing of bipartisan support, Biden formally withdrew the nomination on February 4, 2021.{{Cite web|url=https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/02/04/withdrawals-sent-to-the-senate/|title=Withdrawals Sent to the Senate|date=February 4, 2021|website=The White House}}{{cite web|url=https://hotair.com/karen-townsend/2021/02/09/biden-pull-nomination-raul-manuel-arias-marxuach-court-appeals-n366817|title=Why did Biden pull the nomination of Raul Manuel Arias-Marxuach for Court of Appeals?|publisher=Hot Air|last=Townsend|first=Karen|date=February 9, 2021|accessdate=May 24, 2021}} On May 12, 2021, Biden announced his selection of Gustavo Gelpí, the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, for the position, with his nomination being sent to the Senate later that same day;{{citation-attribution|1=[https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/05/12/president-biden-announces-third-slate-of-judicial-nominees/ "President Biden Announces Third Slate of Judicial Nominees", White House, May 12, 2021] }}{{cite press release |access-date=April 13, 2023 |url=https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/05/12/nominations-sent-to-the-senate-16/ |title=Nominations Sent to the Senate |work=whitehouse.gov |date=May 12, 2021 }} Gelpí was later confirmed on October 18, 2021.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=117&session=1&vote=00414|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Gustavo A Gelpí, of Puerto Rico, to be United States Circuit Judge for the First Circuit)|date=October 18, 2021|website=United States Senate|access-date=October 18, 2021}}

• Halil Suleyman Ozerden (of the Southern District of Mississippi): On June 11, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Ozerden to serve as a United States Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-3/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees}} On June 24, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. His nomination ran into opposition from some conservative groups and he faced skeptical questions from several Republican senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Many of the questions regard his views on religious liberty{{why|date=January 2023}} and some others questioned how many of his rulings had been reversed.{{citation needed|date=January 2023}} On September 12, 2019, Senator Ted Cruz announced his opposition to the nomination.{{Cite web |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/12/ted-cruz-halil-sul-ozerden-nomination-1492305 |title=Ted Cruz will oppose Trump's judicial nominee |last1=Everett |first1=Burgess |last2=Levine |first2=Marianne |website=Politico |language=en |access-date=2019-09-13 |last3=Johnson |first3=Eliana|date=September 12, 2019 }} The Judiciary Committee was scheduled to vote on recommending Ozerden on September 26, 2019, but the vote was postponed after Senator Josh Hawley joined Ted Cruz in his opposition to Ozerden's elevation to the Circuit Court.{{Cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/26/josh-hawley-judicial-nominee-1513793|title=Senate Judiciary shelves vote on Trump judicial pick after conservative opposition|date=September 26, 2019|publisher=Politico|access-date=September 26, 2019|language=en}} On January 3, 2020, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate.{{Cite web |url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/896 |title=PN896 — Nomination of Halil Suleyman Ozerden for The Judiciary, 116th Congress (2019-2020) |date=2020-01-03 |website=congress.gov |access-date=2020-01-04}} Trump later nominated Cory T. Wilson in Ozerden's place, and Wilson was confirmed on June 24, 2020.

• Ryan Bounds (of Oregon): On September 7, 2017, Trump nominated Bounds, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, to the seat vacated by Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain, who assumed senior status on December 31, 2016. A short time later, the state's two Democratic U.S. senators, Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, announced that they would blue slip the nomination. They complained that the Trump administration had bypassed a state bipartisan vetting commission and had not consulted them about the nomination. However, the White House Counsel's office produced records stating that they had contacted the state's U.S. senators on multiple occasions, but had gotten little response from them.{{Cite web|url=https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2017/09/white_house_hits_back_at_orego.html|title=White House hits back at Oregon's senators over appeals court nomination|first=Maxine Bernstein | The|last=Oregonian/OregonLive|date=September 19, 2017|website=oregonlive}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 5, 2018, Trump announced his intent to renominate Bounds to a federal judgeship. On January 8, 2018, his renomination was sent to the Senate. In February 2018, the bipartisan committee cited by the two Senators found Bounds to be qualified.{{cite web |url=https://media.oregonlive.com/portland_impact/other/Signed%20Judicial%20Candidates%20Letter.pdf |title=Letter to Don McGahn |first1=Ron |last1=Wyden |first2=Jeffrey A. |last2=Merkley |authorlink=Ron Wyden |authorlink2=Jeff Merkley |work=United States Senate |via=The Oregonian |date=February 12, 2018 }} However, the senators subsequently questioned Bounds' fitness on the basis of some of his writings when he was a student at Stanford University in the 1990s.{{Cite web|url=https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2018/02/oregons_us_senators_say_federa.html|title=Oregon's U.S. senators say federal prosecutor Ryan Bounds unsuitable for 9th Circuit vacancy|first=Maxine Bernstein | The|last=Oregonian/OregonLive|date=February 12, 2018|website=oregonlive}} On May 9, 2018, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web |url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/05/09/2018/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary |website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=May 9, 2018 }} On June 7, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/06-07-18%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – June 7, 2018, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On July 18, 2018, the United States Senate invoked cloture on his nomination by a 50–49 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=2&vote=00161|title=On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture Ryan Wesley Bounds to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit)|website=senate.gov|access-date=2018-07-19}} On July 19, 2018, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced that Bounds' nomination would be withdrawn after Senators Tim Scott and Marco Rubio announced they would not support the nomination, meaning there would not be enough votes to confirm Bounds.{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/senate-gop-withdraws-judicial-nominee-ryan-bounds-delivering-a-blow-to-trumps-court-plans/2018/07/19/0d81ff50-8b83-11e8-8aea-86e88ae760d8_story.html|title=White House withdraws judicial nominee Ryan Bounds, after GOP realizes he didn't have votes for confirmation |newspaper=The Washington Post |language=en |access-date=2018-07-19}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tim-scott-trump-judicial-nominees_us_5b50e06fe4b0de86f48aff82 |title=Republican Tim Scott Tanks One Of Trump's Judicial Nominees |last=Bendery |first=Jennifer |date=2018-07-19 |website=HuffPost |language=en-US |access-date=2018-07-19}} On July 24, 2018, his nomination was officially withdrawn.{{Cite web |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/two-nominations-one-withdrawal-sent-senate-today-2/ |title=Two Nominations and One Withdrawal Sent to the Senate Today |language=en-US |via=National Archives |work=whitehouse.gov |access-date=2018-07-24}} Trump later nominated Washington County Judge Danielle J. Forrest in Bounds' place, and Forrest was confirmed on November 6, 2019.

• Steven Menashi (of New York): On August 14, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Menashi to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.{{citation-attribution|1={{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-united-states-attorney-nominees-united-states-marshal-nominees/|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees, United States Attorney Nominees, and United States Marshal Nominees|date=August 14, 2019|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|access-date=August 14, 2019}} }}{{cite web | last1=Holland | first1=Jake | title=Trump to Tap White House Aide for N.Y.-Based Appeals Court (2) | url=https://biglawbusiness.com/trump-seeks-to-fill-n-y-based-appeals-seat-with-white-house-aide | date=August 14, 2019 | publisher=Bloomberg Law | access-date=August 17, 2019}} On September 9, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. That same day, the American Bar Association (ABA) rated Menashi as "well qualified," its highest rating.{{Cite web|url=https://eppc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019.09.09-Chair-rating-letter-to-Graham-and-Feinstein-re-nomination-of-Steven-J.-Menashi-to-the-United-States-Court-of-Appeals-for-the-Second-Circuit-1.pdf|title=ABA Chair rating letter to Graham and Feinstein re nomination of Steven J. Menashi to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|first=William C.|last=Hubbard|date=September 9, 2019|website=Ethics and Public Policy Center}} During his hearing, Menashi was criticized by senators from both parties for refusing to answer their questions regarding the role he played in shaping the Trump administration's immigration policies.{{Cite web |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/461000-trump-court-pick-sparks-frustration-for-refusing-to-answer-questions/ |title=Trump court pick sparks frustration for refusing to answer questions |last=Zilbermints |first=Regina |date=2019-09-11 |website= The Hill |language=en |access-date=2019-09-12}}{{Cite web |date=September 11, 2019 |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/11/steven-menashi-trump-judicial-nominee-1489457 |title=Republicans and Democrats hammer Trump's judicial nominee |last=Levine |first=Marianne |website=Politico |language=en |access-date=2019-09-12}} He was also questioned about an article he had written in the University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law about ethnonationalism and Israel.{{Cite web |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/12/politics/menashi-hearing-kfile/index.html |title=Trump court nominee says he regrets if past writings were 'overheated or extreme' |last=Kaczynski |first=Andrew |website=CNN |date=September 12, 2019 |access-date=2019-09-13}} On November 14, 2019, the United States Senate confirmed his nomination by a 51–41 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00356|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Steven J. Menashi to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit)|date=November 14, 2019|website=United States Senate|access-date= November 14, 2019|language=en}}

• Allison Jones Rushing (of North Carolina): On August 27, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Rushing to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.{{cite news |title=Trump nominating N. Carolina native Rushing for 4th Circuit |url=https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article217434940.html |access-date=August 28, 2018 |work=The Charlotte Observer |agency=Associated Press |date=August 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180829072051/https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article217434940.html |archive-date=August 29, 2018 |url-status=dead }} Her official nomination was received on the same day by the Senate.{{Cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/115th-congress/2451|title=PN2451 — Allison Jones Rushing — The Judiciary|date=August 27, 2018|website=United States Senate|access-date=August 27, 2018|language=en}} She was nominated to the seat to be vacated by Allyson K. Duncan, who had previously announced her decision to assume senior status upon the confirmation of her successor. On October 17, 2018, a hearing on her nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/10/17/2018/nominations|title=Nominations – United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=October 17, 2018 |access-date=November 5, 2018}} During Rushing's confirmation hearing, she was questioned about her ties to the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative Christian group that she had interned for as a law student. ADF has been criticized for opposing LGBT rights. Rushing's defenders pointed out that she had only briefly interned for the group back in 2009 and had little contact with it since. Rushing was asked if she would recuse herself from ADF-related cases if confirmed. She replied: "I would determine the appropriate action with the input of the parties, consultation of these rules and ethical canons, and consultation with my colleagues." Asked about ADF being labeled a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Rushing said: "Hate is wrong, and it should have no place in our society. In my experience with ADF, I have not witnessed anyone expressing or advocating hate."{{Cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/trump-s-newly-confirmed-federal-judge-has-ties-anti-gay-n980281 |title=Trump's new federal judge has ties to anti-gay 'hate group' |website=NBC News |date=March 6, 2019 |language=en |access-date=2019-03-07}} On January 3, 2019, her nomination was returned to Trump under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced his intent to renominate Rushing for a federal judgeship.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-judicial-nominees/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Intent to Nominate Judicial Nominees}} Her nomination was sent to the Senate later that day.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/nominations-sent-senate-2/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Nominations Sent to the Senate}} On February 7, 2019, her nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/02.07.2019%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting1.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – February 7, 2019, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On March 5, 2019, the United States Senate confirmed Rushing by a 53–44 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00035|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Allison Jones Rushing, of North Carolina, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit)|date=March 5, 2019|website=United States Senate|access-date=March 5, 2019}}

• Kyle Duncan (of Louisiana): On September 28, 2017, Trump announced his intent to nominate Duncan to an undetermined seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.{{Cite press release |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-eighth-wave-judicial-candidates/ |title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Eighth Wave of Judicial Candidates |access-date=February 13, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171003011939/https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/09/28/president-donald-j-trump-announces-eighth-wave-judicial-candidates |archive-date=October 3, 2017 |url-status=live }} On October 2, 2017, he was officially nominated to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, to the seat vacated by Judge W. Eugene Davis, who assumed senior status on December 31, 2016.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/11/29/2017/nominations|title=United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=November 29, 2017 }} Duncan's judicial record was attacked by Democrats as being too conservative.{{Cite web |url=https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_ad7a3a48-442c-11e8-b59c-77f6d9c9b3df.html |title=Why judicial nominees Wendy Vitter, Kyle Duncan in liberal groups' cross-hairs |last=Stole |first=Bryn |date=April 19, 2018 |work=The Advocate |access-date=May 11, 2018}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/08/opinion/kyle-duncan-john-thompson.html |title=Kyle Duncan Is Unfit to Be a Judge |last=Thompson |first=Laverne |date=February 8, 2018 |work=The New York Times |access-date=May 11, 2018}} Republicans defended him, pointing out his academic and legal achievements and pointing out that he was rated "Well Qualified" by the American Bar Association.{{citation needed|date=May 2018}} Republican Senator John Kennedy withheld his blue slip, stating that Duncan had not lived in Louisiana for years and calling into question his support for Duncan's nomination.{{Cite web |url=https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_c0465f52-c98f-11e7-ae9e-d39e31680e13.html |title=Sen. John Kennedy keeping mum on nomination of conservative Kyle Duncan to 5th Circuit judgeship |last=Stole |first=Bryn |date=November 14, 2017 |work=The Advocate |access-date=May 11, 2018}} On November 29, 2017, a hearing was held on his nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Kennedy was impressed by Duncan's testimony and announced his support the following day.{{citation needed|date=May 2018}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate. On January 5, 2018, Trump announced his intent to renominate Duncan to a federal judgeship. On January 8, 2018, his renomination was sent to the Senate. On January 18, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.{{cite web |url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2001-18-181.pdf |title=Results of Executive Business Meeting |date=January 18, 2018 |website=judiciary.senate.gov|access-date=2020-12-04}} On April 24, 2018, his nomination was confirmed by a 50–47 vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=2&vote=00082|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Stuart Kyle Duncan, of Louisiana, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit)|website=United States Senate}}
• Cory T. Wilson: On August 28, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Wilson to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. On October 15, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Trump nominated Wilson to the seat vacated by Judge Louis Guirola Jr., who assumed senior status on March 23, 2018.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/twenty-five-nominations-three-withdrawals-sent-senate/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Twenty-five Nominations and Three Withdrawals Sent to the Senate}} On January 3, 2020, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate.{{Cite web |url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/1176 |title=PN1176 - Nomination of Cory T. Wilson for The Judiciary, 116th Congress (2019-2020) |date=2020-01-03 |website=congress.gov |access-date=2020-01-04}} On January 6, 2020, his renomination was sent to the Senate.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/twenty-one-nominations-sent-senate/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Twenty-one Nominations Sent to the Senate}} A hearing on his nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was held on January 8, 2020.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/01/08/2020/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=January 8, 2020 }} During his confirmation hearing, Wilson's past comments on social media about President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez were scrutinized, as well as his previous stances as a state legislator regarding abortion, LGBT rights, the Affordable Care Act,{{Cite web |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-court-pick-would-ax-tweets-on-clintons-obama-if-confirmed |title=Judge Pick Would Ax Tweets on Clinton, Obama, if Confirmed (1) |date=2020-01-08 |website=news.bloomberglaw.com |language=en |access-date=2020-02-24}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.courthousenews.com/mississippi-judicial-pick-grilled-over-record-as-lawmaker/ |title=Mississippi Judicial Pick Grilled Over Record as Lawmaker |last=Ryan |first=Tim |date=2020-01-08 |language=en-US |access-date=2020-02-24}} and voting rights. On May 4, 2020, Trump withdrew Wilson's nomination to the district court and nominated him to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that was vacated by Judge E. Grady Jolly, who assumed senior status on October 3, 2017. On June 24, 2020, his nomination was confirmed by a 52–48 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00125|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Cory T. Wilson, of Mississippi to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit)|date=June 24, 2020|website=United States Senate|access-date=2020-06-24}} Taylor B. McNeel was later nominated to the district court seat in Wilson's place and subsequently confirmed.

• John K. Bush (of Kentucky): On May 8, 2017, Trump announced that he would nominate prominent Louisville lawyer Bush to the seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated by Judge Danny Julian Boggs, who assumed senior status on February 28, 2017.{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/07/us/politics/trump-lower-court-nominees-conservatives.html|title=Trump to Announce Slate of Conservative Federal Court Nominees|first=Adam|last=Liptak|date=May 7, 2017|work=The New York Times}} On a questionnaire submitted to the committee, Bush acknowledged that between 2007 and 2016, he had pseudonymously authored approximately 400 blog posts on Elephants in the Bluegrass, a blog founded by his wife, Bridget.{{cite news|last1=Wolfson|first1=Andrew|title=Using pen name, judicial nominee wrote slavery and abortion are our 'greatest tragedies'|url=https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/local/2017/05/24/blog-posts-could-dog-trump-judicial-nominee-and-louisville-lawyer-john-k-bush/340746001/|access-date=August 8, 2017|publisher=Courier Journal|date=May 24, 2017}} His blog posts espoused conservative political views and expressed opposition to gay marriage, the Affordable Care Act, public financing of political campaigns, and the idea of trying terrorists in civilian courts.{{cite news|last1=Tillman|first1=Zoe|title=One Of Trump's Judicial Nominees Blogged Under A Pen Name That Ted Cruz Was A "Sore Loser"|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/one-of-trumps-judicial-nominees-blogged-under-a-pen-name|access-date=August 8, 2017|publisher=BuzzFeed News|date=May 19, 2017}}{{cite news|last1=Wolfson|first1=Andrew|title=Trump's judicial nominee from Louisville ducks questions about his controversial blog posts |url=https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2017/06/28/judicial-nominee-louisville-john-k-bush-ducks-questions-controversial-blog-posts/433160001/ |access-date=August 8, 2017|publisher=Courier Journal|date=June 28, 2017}} Bush also compared abortion to slavery, calling the topics "the two greatest tragedies in our country." When questioned about his blogging during his judicial nomination process, Bush said that "my personal views are irrelevant to the position for which I have been nominated" and that "Blogging is a political activity. It is not appropriate to bring politics to the bench."{{cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/2017/06/15/533014228/senators-grill-trump-judicial-nominees-on-provocative-blog-posts |first=Nina |last=Totenberg |title=Senators Grill Trump Judicial Nominees On Provocative Blog Posts |website=NPR |date=June 15, 2017 }} On July 20, 2017, the United States Senate confirmed him by a 51–47 vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00164|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation John Kenneth Bush, of Kentucky, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit)|website=senate.gov}}
• Chad Readler (of Ohio): On June 7, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Readler to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On June 18, 2018, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Trump nominated Readler to the seat being vacated by Judge Deborah L. Cook, who would assume senior status upon confirmation of her successor.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/seventeen-nominations-one-withdrawal-sent-senate-today/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Seventeen Nominations and One Withdrawal Sent to the Senate Today}} In June 2018, U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown said he did not plan to return his blue slip for Readler's nomination, while U.S. Senator Rob Portman said he planned to support Readler's nomination.{{cite news |last1=Heisig |first1=Eric |title=Sen. Sherrod Brown says he will not support Trump's nominees for Ohio-based appeals court |url=https://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/index.ssf/2018/06/sen_sherrod_brown_says_he_will.html |access-date=June 20, 2018 |publisher=Cleveland.com |date=June 7, 2018}} On October 10, 2018, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web |url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/10/10/2018/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary |website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=October 10, 2018 }} During his confirmation hearing, Democrats criticized Readler for having supported a Republican lawsuit aimed at dismantling the Affordable Care Act, including its protections for individuals with pre-existing conditions.{{Cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/06/us/politics/senate-readler-trump-confirmation.html |title=Senate Confirms Trump Nominee Who as Justice Official Fought the Affordable Care Act |last=Hulse |first=Carl |date=2019-03-06 |website=The New York Times |language=en-US |access-date=2019-03-07}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/democrats-say-wont-soon-forget-confirmation-trump-judicial-nominee-chad-readler |title=Democrats vow Judge Chad Readler will be 2020 issue |last=Lesniewski |first=Niels |date=2019-03-06 |language=en |access-date=2019-03-07 |archive-date=March 7, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190307053714/http://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/democrats-say-wont-soon-forget-confirmation-trump-judicial-nominee-chad-readler |url-status=dead }} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. He was renominated on January 23, 2019.{{cite web |title=Nominations Sent to the Senate |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/nominations-sent-senate-2/ |via=National Archives |work=whitehouse.gov |access-date=January 23, 2019}} On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On March 6, 2019, his nomination was confirmed by a 52–47 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00037|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Chad A. Readler, of Ohio, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit)|website=senate.gov}}

• Michael B. Brennan (of Wisconsin): On August 3, 2017, Trump nominated Brennan, a former Judge on the Milwaukee County Circuit Court, to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, to the seat vacated by Judge Terence T. Evans, who assumed senior status on January 17, 2010. Upon the announcement of his nomination, Senator Ron Johnson supported his nomination. However, Senator Tammy Baldwin criticized Trump for bypassing the bipartisan commission composed to vet potential judicial candidates. She withheld her blue slip, but the nomination proceeded anyway.{{cite web |url=http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/04/donald-trump-appoints-gov-scott-walker-ally-federal-7th-circuit-court-appeals/539442001/ |title=Baldwin: Trump ignored bipartisan panel by nominating Gov. Scott Walker ally to 7th Circuit Court of Appeals |last=Marley |first=Patrick |date=August 4, 2017 |website=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel |access-date=November 11, 2017}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 5, 2018, Trump announced his intent to renominate Brennan to a federal judgeship. On January 8, 2018, his renomination was sent to the Senate. On February 15, 2018, Brennan’s nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote,[https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/02-15-18%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf Results of Executive Business Meeting – February 15, 2018, Senate Judiciary Committee] over the strenuous objections of Democrats on the committee.{{cite web|url=https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=26179|title=Judiciary Committee Approves Brennan for Seventh Circuit Seat, Next Step Senate Vote|website=WisBar}} On May 10, 2018, his nomination was confirmed by a 49–46 vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=2&vote=00089|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Michael B. Brennan, of Wisconsin, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit)|website=senate.gov}}

• L. Steven Grasz (of Nebraska): On August 3, 2017, Trump nominated Grasz to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, to the seat vacated by Judge William J. Riley, who assumed senior status on June 30, 2017.{{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/08/03/eighteen-nominations-sent-senate-today|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Eighteen Nominations Sent to the Senate Today}} In October 2017, the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, a nonpartisan entity which rates judicial nominees, unanimously voted to give Grasz a "not qualified" rating for the position.{{cite news|last1=Min Kim|first1=Seung|title=ABA deems another Trump judicial nominee 'not qualified'|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/30/aba-trump-judicial-nominee-not-qualified-244327|access-date=October 30, 2017|work=Politico|date=October 30, 2017}} On December 7, 2017, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–9 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2012-07-17.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – December 7, 2017, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On December 12, 2017, the United States Senate confirmed his nomination by a 50–48 vote;{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00313|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Leonard Steven Grasz, of Nebraska, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit)|website=www.senate.gov}} the vote was along party lines with Senators John McCain and Thad Cochran abstaining from the vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/leonard-steven-grasz-trump-judicial-pick-not-qualified-okd-senate/|title=Leonard Steven Grasz, Trump judicial pick rated as "not qualified," OK'd by Senate|work=CBS News|date=December 13, 2017 }}
• David Stras (of Minnesota): On May 8, 2017, Trump nominated Stras, an Associate Justice on the Minnesota Supreme Court, to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated by Judge Diana E. Murphy who assumed senior status on November 29, 2016.{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/05/07/here-come-trumps-judges-president-to-put-forward-more-strong-judicial-nominees/|title=Opinion - Here come Trump's judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees|first=Jonathan H.|last=Adler|date=May 7, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post}} The state's then-junior U.S. Senator, Amy Klobuchar, turned in her blue slip, but on September 5, 2017, Minnesota's then-senior U.S. Senator, Al Franken, announced that he would not return his blue slip for Stras. Franken stated that while he had nothing personally against Stras, the White House had not adequately consulted him about the nomination and added that he wanted to prevent the White House from achieving a "right wing" takeover of the Federal Judiciary.{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/05/al-franken-opposes-david-stras-242340|title=Franken opposes Trump judicial nominee, setting up procedural clash|work=Politico|date=September 5, 2017 }} On November 16, Franken was accused of making unwanted sexual advances to a talk show hostess,{{Cite news|url=https://frostsnow.com/american-model-leeann-tweeden-married-life-with-husband-chris-dougherty-children|title=American Model Leeann Tweeden Married Life With Husband Chris Dougherty, Children?|first=Mahammad Arsad|last=shekh|date=April 3, 2017|newspaper=Famousstardom}} and that was followed by other similar accusations from other women. On November 29, 2017, a hearing was held on Stras's nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee. On December 7, Franken announced that he would resign from the Senate effective January 2, 2018. He was replaced by Democrat Tina Smith. On January 3, 2018, Stras's nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 5, 2018, Trump announced his intent to renominate Stras to a federal judgeship.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-renomination-21-judicial-nominees/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Renomination of 21 Judicial Nominees}} On January 8, 2018, his renomination was sent to the Senate.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/nominations-sent-senate-today-2/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Nominations Sent to the Senate Today}} On January 18, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 13–8 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2001-18-181.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – January 18, 2018|date=January 18, 2018|work=United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|access-date=November 19, 2022}} On January 30, 2018, the United States Senate confirmed his nomination by a 56–42 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1152/vote_115_2_00027.htm|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation David Ryan Stras, of Minnesota, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit)|date=January 30, 2018|work=United States Senate|access-date=January 30, 2018}}{{cite web|url=https://www.dailypress.senate.gov/?p=20581|title=Tuesday, January 30, 2018 - www.dailypress.senate.gov|website=dailypress.senate.gov|date=30 January 2018}}
• Jonathan A. Kobes (of South Dakota): On June 11, 2018, Kobes, a former top aide to U.S. Senator Mike Rounds, was nominated to serve on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. He quickly drew opposition from liberal interest groups and Democrats, who claimed that some of his prior clients showed ideological bias and that he didn't have enough courtroom experience.{{citation needed|date=April 2020}} Their cause was aided when the American Bar Association rated Kobes as "Unqualified." Republicans denounced the rating, claiming that the lead attorney evaluating nominees for the 8th Circuit was politically motivated and biased.{{citation needed|date=April 2020}} On December 11, 2018, the United States Senate confirmed Kobes by a 51–50 vote, with Vice President Mike Pence casting the tie-breaking vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1152/vote_115_2_00258.htm|title= On the Nomination (Confirmation Jonathan A. Kobes, of South Dakota, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit)|website=www.senate.gov}}

• Eric D. Miller (of Washington): On July 13, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Miller to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On July 19, 2018, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Trump nominated Miller to the seat vacated by Judge Richard C. Tallman, who assumed senior status on March 3, 2018.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/one-nomination-sent-senate-today-8/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=One Nomination Sent to the Senate Today}} Neither of Washington's two U.S. senators, Democrats Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray, returned their blue slips for Miller.{{cite news |last1=Paul |first1=Deanna |title='Damaging precedent': Conservative federal judge installed without consent of home-state senators |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/02/27/dangerous-first-conservative-judge-installed-after-vetting-by-only-two-senators/ |access-date=13 June 2019 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=February 28, 2019}} On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On February 26, 2019, the United States Senate confirmed Miller by a 53–46 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00029|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Eric D. Miller, of Washington, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit)|date=February 26, 2019|website=United States Senate|access-date=February 26, 2019|language=en}} Miller became the first federal appeals court judge in over a century to be confirmed without support from at least one home state senator.{{cite news |last1=Connelly |first1=Joel |title=McConnell rolls over Murray, Cantwell on Trump court appointment |url=https://www.seattlepi.com/local/politics/article/McConnell-rolls-over-Murray-Cantwell-on-Trump-13647364.php |access-date=13 June 2019 |publisher=Seattle Post Intelligencer |date=February 26, 2019}}
• Daniel Bress (of California): On January 30, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Bress to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On February 6, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. He has been nominated to the seat vacated by Alex Kozinski, who retired on December 18, 2017. In May 2019, the confirmation hearing for Bress devolved into a debate about Bress' geographic roots. Bress, a native of Gilroy, California, moved to Washington D.C. approximately ten years ago in order for his wife to pursue her career.{{cite news |last1=Kim |first1=Ellis |title=Kirkland's Daniel Bress, Nominated to Ninth Circuit, Grilled Over California Ties |url=https://www.law.com/therecorder/2019/05/22/kirklands-daniel-bress-nominated-to-ninth-circuit-grilled-over-california-ties/ |access-date=18 June 2019 |publisher=Law.com |date=May 22, 2019}} On June 20, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%20June%2020%202019.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – June 20, 2019, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On July 9, 2019, the United States Senate confirmed his nomination by a 53–45 vote.{{Cite web |url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00191 |title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Daniel A. Bress, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit)|date=July 9, 2019|website=United States Senate|access-date=July 9, 2019|language=en}}
• Patrick J. Bumatay (of California): On October 10, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Bumatay to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Both U.S. senators from California, Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, announced their opposition to his nomination.{{Cite web |url=https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-9th-circuit-nominees-20181011-story.html |title=California senators will try to block White House judicial nominees for the 9th Circuit - Los Angeles Times |last=Wire |first=Sarah D. |date=2018-10-11 |website=Los Angeles Times |access-date=2018-10-16}} On November 13, 2018, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Trump nominated Bumatay to the seat vacated by Judge Alex Kozinski, who retired on December 18, 2017.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/twenty-six-nominations-sent-senate/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Twenty Six Nominations Sent to the Senate}} The decision to move forward with his nomination to the appeals court angered California Senator Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Feinstein claims that she was not consulted about his nomination, he was never mentioned as a potential nominee, and she claimed he had no judicial experience, therefore, she was planning to withhold her blue slip.{{Cite web |url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/13/politics/white-house-ninth-circuit-judges/index.html |title=White House nominations to 9th Circuit set off firestorm |last=de Vogue |first=Ariane |date=2018-10-13 |website=CNN |access-date=2019-01-31}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/10/17/patrick-bumatay-trump-judicial-nominee/1668092002/ |title=Trump makes his second nomination of openly gay person to be federal judge |last=Cummings |first=William |date=2018-10-17 |website=USA Today |language=en |access-date=2019-01-31}} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. Trump later nominated Daniel Bress in Bumatay's place, who was subsequently confirmed, while Bumatay was instead nominated to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California to the seat vacated by judge Marilyn L. Huff, who assumed senior status on September 30, 2016. On October 15, 2019, Trump withdrew Bumatay's nomination to the district court and nominated him to the seat being vacated by Carlos Bea, who planned to assume senior status upon the confirmation of his successor. Todd W. Robinson was later nominated to the district court seat in Bumatay's place and subsequently confirmed on September 16, 2020. On November 21, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%20November%2021%202019.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – November 21, 2019, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On December 10, 2019, the United States Senate confirmed his nomination by a 53–40 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00387|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Patrick J. Bumatay, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit)|website=www.senate.gov|access-date=2019-12-11}} Bumatay is the first Filipino American to serve as an Article III federal appellate judge. Bumatay is gay and was the second LGBT person to be nominated by Trump to a federal judicial position.{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/trump-nominates-openly-gay-conservative-federal-appeals-court-n920831|title=Trump nominates openly gay conservative to federal appeals court|website=NBC News|date=October 16, 2018 }}
• Lawrence VanDyke (of Nevada): On September 20, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate VanDyke to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Nevada Senators Jacky Rosen and Catherine Cortez Masto, both Democrats, announced their disappointment in the nomination.{{cite news|url=https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/cortez-masto-and-rosen-raise-concerns-about-trumps-intention-to-tap-lawrence-vandyke-for-ninth-circuit-court-of-appeal|title=Nevada senators raise concerns about Trump's intention to tap ex-Nevada solicitor general for Ninth Circuit|last1=Sanchez|first1=Humberto|date=September 20, 2019|access-date=23 September 2019|publisher=Nevada Independent}} He was nominated to the seat being vacated by Judge Jay Bybee, who previously announced his intention to assume senior status on December 31, 2019. VanDyke received a "not qualified" rating from the American Bar Association. ABA evaluators conducted 60 anonymous interviews with lawyers, judges, and others who had worked with VanDyke. The ABA published a scathing critique of VanDyke in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee; that letter asserted that interviewees described VanDyke as "'arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice'" of law. The ABA added that "'There was a theme that the nominee lacks humility, has an 'entitlement' temperament, does not have an open mind, and does not always have a commitment to being candid and truthful'".{{Cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-judicial-nominee-hearing|title=Trump judicial pick breaks down in tears at hearing over legal group's attack|last=Blitzer|first=Ronn|date=October 30, 2019|website=Fox News}} The ABA also raised "concerns about whether Mr. VanDyke would be fair to persons who are gay, lesbian, or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community, adding that "Mr. VanDyke would not say affirmatively that he would be fair to any litigant before him, notably members of the LGBTQ community."{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/30/trump-judicial-nominee-cries-over-scathing-letter-american-bar-association|title=Trump judicial nominee cries over scathing letter from the American Bar Association|last1=Knowles|first1=Hannah|date=October 30, 2019|access-date=1 November 2019|newspaper=The Washington Post}} On October 30, 2019, a hearing on VanDyke's nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/10/30/2019/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=October 30, 2019 }} Most of the two-hour hearing was focused on VanDyke's record on LGBTQ issues.{{cite web|url=https://www.ebar.com/news/latest_news//283860|title=Bay Area Reporter :: Online Extra: Trump judicial nominee defends himself against anti-LGBT claims|last=Keen|first=Lisa|publisher=Ebar.com|access-date=2019-11-02}} During his confirmation hearing, VanDyke was asked, "Did you say that you wouldn't be fair to members of the LGBTQ community?"{{cite news|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/10/american-bar-association-attack-on-lawrence-vandyke-doesnt-make-sense/|title=The ABA's Attack on Lawrence VanDyke Doesn't Make Sense|last1=McCormack|first1=John|date=October 31, 2019|access-date=1 November 2019|publisher=National Review}} VanDyke broke down in tears, denying the accusation: "'I did not say that. I do not believe that. It is a fundamental belief of mine that all people are created in the image of God and they should all be treated with dignity and respect'". Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt), questioned VanDyke about an opinion editorial he wrote in 2004 while a student at Harvard Law noting that same-sex marriage may be harmful for children. VanDyke stated that his views had changed since that time.{{cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-judicial-nominee-hearing|title=Trump judicial pick breaks down in tears at hearing over legal group's attack|date=2019-10-29|publisher=Fox News|access-date=2019-11-02}} VanDyke said that during a three-hour meeting with the ABA, the ABA evaluator told him that she was in a "hurry" and did not give him the opportunity to fully respond to concerns. The ABA acknowledged that the lead ABA evaluator assigned to VanDyke, Montana attorney Marcia Davenport, contributed $150 to VanDyke's opponent in a 2014 Montana Supreme Court election.{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics/american-bar-association-nominees-vandyke/index.html|title='Not qualified' rating and accusation from American Bar Association moves Trump nominee to tears|last1=de Vogue|first1=Ariane|date=October 30, 2019|access-date=30 October 2019|publisher=CNN|last2=Rogers|first2=Alex}} On November 21, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%20November%2021%202019.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – November 21, 2019, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On December 11, 2019, his nomination was confirmed by a 51–44 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1161/vote_116_1_00391.htm|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Lawrence VanDyke, of Nevada, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit)|website=www.senate.gov|access-date=2019-12-11}}

• Andrew L. Brasher (of Alabama): On November 6, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Brasher to serve as a United States circuit judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-8/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees}} On November 21, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Trump nominated Brasher to the seat to be vacated by Judge Edward Earl Carnes, who previously announced his intention to assume senior status on a date to be determined.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/nine-nominations-sent-senate-5/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Nine Nominations Sent to the Senate}} A hearing on his nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was held on December 4, 2019.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/12/04/2019/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=December 4, 2019 }} On January 3, 2020, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate.{{Cite web |url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/1297 |title=PN1297 - Nomination of Andrew Lynn Brasher for The Judiciary, 116th Congress (2019-2020) |date=2020-01-03 |website=congress.gov |access-date=2020-01-04}} Later that day, he was re-nominated to the same seat.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/four-nominations-sent-senate-2/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Four Nominations Sent to the Senate}} The National Urban League and the NAACP urged the Senate to reject his nomination to the Eleventh Circuit.{{Cite web |url=https://www.al.com/politics/2020/02/senate-confirms-alabama-judge-andrew-brasher-for-federal-appeals-court-post.html |title=Alabama judge confirmed for federal appeals court |last=Koplowitz |first=Howard |date=2020-02-11 |website=al |language=en |access-date=2020-02-24}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.al.com/politics/2020/01/alabama-naacp-among-groups-calling-for-halt-to-federal-judgeship-confirmation.html |title=Alabama NAACP: Halt confirmation of judge |date=2020-01-15 |website=al |language=en |access-date=2020-02-24}}{{Cite web |url=https://news.yahoo.com/trump-is-elevating-judges-who-could-gut-the-voting-rights-act-185115809.html |title=Trump is elevating judges who could gut the Voting Rights Act |last=Nazaryan |first=Alexander |date=2020-02-12 |website=Yahoo! News |language=en-US |access-date=2020-02-24}} On January 16, 2020, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/011620%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – January 16, 2020, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On February 11, 2020, his nomination was confirmed by a 52–43 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00036|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Andrew Lynn Brasher, of Alabama, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit)|website=senate.gov|access-date=2020-02-11}}

• Brett Talley: In September 2017, he was nominated by Trump to fill a vacancy on the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.{{cite news|last1=Johnson|first1=Carrie|url=https://www.npr.org/2017/12/13/570499146/white-house-nomination-of-alabama-lawyer-brett-talley-will-not-be-moving-forward|title=White House: Nomination of Alabama Lawyer Brett Talley 'Will Not Be Moving Forward'|access-date=December 13, 2017|work=NPR|date=December 13, 2017}} His nomination drew controversy due to his lack of courtroom or judicial experience, partisan personal blogging, and failure to disclose that he was married to Ann Donaldson, the Chief of Staff to White House Counsel Don McGahn. He became the third judicial nominee since 1989 to receive a unanimous rating of "not qualified" from the American Bar Association.{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/politics/trump-judge-brett-talley-nomination.html|title=Trump Judicial Pick Did Not Disclose He Is Married to a White House Lawyer|last1=Apuzzo|first1=Matt|date=November 13, 2017|work=The New York Times|access-date=November 13, 2017|last2=Schmidt|first2=Michael S.|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}} On December 13, 2017, Talley withdrew his name from consideration for the appointment.{{cite news|last1=Savage|first1=David|title=Embattled Trump judicial nominee Brett Talley withdraws|url=https://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-pol-essential-washington-updates-embattled-trump-judge-nominee-withdraws-1513192192-htmlstory.html|access-date=December 14, 2017|work=Los Angeles Times|date=December 13, 2017}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate.{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2018/1/3/daily-digest|title=Congressional Record|website=congress.gov}} Trump later nominated Andrew L. Brasher in Talley's place, and Brasher was confirmed on May 1, 2019.
• Edmund LaCour: On May 20, 2020, the Trump White House announced that it would nominate state Solicitor General LaCour to be a Judge on the District Court.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominee-6/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominee}} The nomination drew objections from Democrats and progressives, claiming that LaCour was partisan and ideologically biased, noting his past clients and membership in the Federalist Society. In response, Senator Doug Jones refused to turn in the blue slip consenting to LaCour's nomination.{{citation needed|date=October 2020}}

• Jon Katchen: On April 10, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Katchen to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. On April 12, 2018, his nomination was sent to the Senate. He was nominated to the seat vacated by Judge Ralph Beistline, who assumed senior status on December 31, 2015. His nomination was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/twenty-nine-nominations-sent-senate-today/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Twenty-Nine Nominations Sent to the Senate Today}} In August 2018, Katchen withdrew his name from consideration, citing the uncertainty of the nomination process and timing.{{cite news |last1=Martinson |first1=Erica |title=Anchorage attorney, nominated by Trump, withdraws from federal judgeship |url=https://www.adn.com/politics/2018/08/28/anchorage-attorney-nominated-by-trump-withdraws-from-federal-judgeship/ |access-date=17 September 2018 |work=Anchorage Daily News |date=August 28, 2018}}{{cite news |last1=Ruskin |first1=Liz |title=Alaska nominee for US court opts out |url=https://www.alaskapublic.org/2018/08/27/alaska-nominee-for-us-court-opts-out/ |access-date=17 September 2018 |publisher=Alaska Public Media |date=August 27, 2018}} Trump later nominated Joshua Kindred in Katchen's place, and Kindred was confirmed on February 12, 2020.

• Jeff Mateer: On September 7, 2017, Trump nominated Mateer to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, to the seat vacated by Judge Richard A. Schell, who assumed senior status on March 10, 2015.{{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/09/07/eight-nominations-sent-senate-today|title=Eight Nominations Sent to the Senate Today|date=September 7, 2017|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|access-date=September 8, 2017}} Mateer was recommended to the White House by Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz.{{cite news|title=No judgeship for 'Satan's plan' Texan, as White House drops Jeff Mateer nomination|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2017/12/12/grassley-urges-trump-drop-mateer-judicial-pick-spoke-satans-plan-transgender-kids|last1=Cobler|first1=Nicole|last2=Gillman|first2=Todd J.|date=December 12, 2017|work=The Dallas Morning News|access-date=December 15, 2017}} After Mateer's remarks about transgender kids being part of "Satan's plan" and his support for conversion therapy were publicized in late September 2017, John Cornyn, a Republican Senator from Texas and Senate Majority Whip, expressed skepticism about Mateer's suitability to sit on the federal bench.{{cite web|last=Diaz |first=Kevin |url=http://www.expressnews.com/news/local/article/Cornyn-has-doubts-about-nominee-who-said-12239028.php |title=Cornyn has doubts about nominee who said transgender rights were 'Satan's plan'|newspaper=San Antonio Express-News|date=September 28, 2017}} Cornyn and members of a committee that screens Texas judicial candidates said that Mateer had not disclosed the statements. Senator Cruz said that he still supported Mateer's nomination.{{cite web |first=Nicole |last=Cobler |url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2017/09/28/cruz-stands-trump-court-pick-sees-satans-plan-transgender-kids |title=Cruz stands by Trump court pick who sees 'Satan's plan' in transgender kids; Cornyn undecided|newspaper=The Dallas Morning News |date=September 28, 2017}} On December 14, 2017, Mateer withdrew himself from consideration. On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. Trump later nominated Sean D. Jordan in Mateer's place, and Jordan was confirmed on July 30, 2019.

• Matthew S. Petersen: on September 7, 2017, Trump nominated Federal Election Commissioner Petersen to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, to the seat vacated by Judge Richard W. Roberts, who assumed senior status on March 16, 2016.{{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/09/07/president-donald-j-trump-announces-seventh-wave-judicial-candidates|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Seventh Wave of Judicial Candidates}} On December 13, 2017, during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee{{cite web|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-judicial-nominee-matthew-petersen_us_5a37ec14e4b0ff955ad51e82|title=Trump Judicial Nominee Drops Out After Embarrassing Hearing|first=Jennifer|last=Bendery|date=December 18, 2017|work=HuffPost}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/12/15/that-painful-exchange-between-a-trump-judicial-pick-and-a-gop-senator-annotated/|title=Analysis {{!}} That painful exchange between a Trump judicial pick and a GOP senator, annotated |last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=December 15, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=December 15, 2017|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286}} Senator John Neely Kennedy (R-LA) questioned Petersen about legal procedure,{{cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/365050-dem-senator-bashes-trump-judicial-nominee-over-hearing-testimony/|title=Dem senator bashes Trump judicial nominee over hearing testimony: 'Hoo-boy'|first=John|last=Bowden|date=December 14, 2017|work= The Hill}} asking if Petersen knew what the Daubert standard was, and what a motion in limine was. He was unable to answer.{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/15/us/politics/matthew-petersen-senator-kennedy.html|title=Trump Judicial Nominee Attracts Scorn After Flopping in Hearing|last1=Bromwich|first1=Jonah Engel|date=December 15, 2017|work=The New York Times|access-date=December 15, 2017|last2=Chokshi|first2=Niraj|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/12/15/trump-judicial-nominee-fumbles-basic-questions-about-the-law/|title=Trump judicial nominee fumbles basic questions about the law|first=Derek|last=Hawkins|date=December 15, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post}} Petersen's answers received criticism in the press and from lawmakers. The New York Times described it as one of the "more painful Senate hearings in recent memory." Petersen withdrew himself from consideration on December 16, 2017.{{cite news|last1=Merica|first1=Dan|title=Trump judicial nominee Matthew Petersen withdraws after viral hearing video|url=http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/18/politics/trump-judicial-nominee-petersen-withdraws/index.html|access-date=December 18, 2017|work=CNN|date=December 18, 2017}}{{cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/365455-trump-judicial-nominee-withdraws-after-humiliating-hearing/|title=Trump judicial nominee withdraws after humiliating hearing|first=Tristan|last=Lejeune|date=December 18, 2017|work= The Hill}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. Trump later nominated Carl J. Nichols in Petersen's place, and Nichols was confirmed on May 22, 2019.

• Thomas Marcelle: On October 10, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Marcelle to serve as a Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Marcelle was nominated to the seat on the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York vacated by Judge Gary L. Sharpe, who assumed senior status on January 1, 2016. On November 13, 2018, his nomination was sent to the U.S. Senate. On January 3, 2019, Marcelle's nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced that he had renominated Marcelle. On August 29, 2019, Marcelle had withdrawn his name from consideration after his nomination was blocked by U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand due to his perceived opposition to abortion.{{Cite news |url=https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/U-S-Attorney-in-Albany-picked-for-federal-14397720.php |title=Gillibrand blocked judge's nomination to federal bench |last1=Gavin |first1=Robert |last2=Goodwin |first2=Mike |date=2019-08-29 |website=Times Union |access-date=2019-09-11}} The White House officially withdrew his nomination on September 19, 2019.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/eight-nominations-three-withdrawals-sent-senate/ |date=September 19, 2019 |via=National Archives |work=whitehouse.gov |title=Eight Nominations and Three Withdrawals Sent to the Senate}} Trump later nominated Ryan T. McAllister in Marcelle's place.
• Ryan T. McAllister: On August 12, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate McAllister to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. On September 8, 2020, his nomination was sent to the Senate. A former aide to New York Governor George Pataki and Congressman John Faso, McAllister drew attacks from progressives and Democrats, who claimed that his experience was too political in nature and that he couldn't be objective on the bench. McAllister had been nominated after Senator Kirsten Gillibrand had withheld her blue slip consenting to the nomination of Thomas Marcelle to this post.{{Cite news|url=https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/U-S-Attorney-in-Albany-picked-for-federal-14397720.php|title=Gillibrand blocked judge's nomination to federal bench|first1=Robert|last1=Gavin|first2=Mike|last2=Goodwin|date=August 29, 2019|website=Times Union}} McAllister was a part of a bipartisan package of judicial nominees and at first New York's Democratic U.S. senators, Gillibrand and Chuck Schumer, grudgingly acquiesced to his nomination in exchange for the nominations of Jennifer H. Rearden and Hector Gonzalez. But after the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before the 2020 presidential election, Schumer and Gillibrand refused to turn in their blue slips in retaliation, leaving his nomination stalled. President Biden nominated Anne M. Nardacci in McAllister’s place and she was confirmed on November 30, 2022.

• Thomas Farr: On July 13, 2017, Trump nominated Farr to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, to the seat vacated by Judge Malcolm Jones Howard, who assumed senior status on December 31, 2005.{{cite web|url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/07/13/ten-nominations-sent-senate-today|title="Ten Nominations Sent to the Senate Today" White House, July 13, 2017|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170714065923/https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/07/13/ten-nominations-sent-senate-today|archive-date=July 14, 2017 }} On September 20, 2017, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/09/20/2017/nominations|title=United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=September 20, 2017 }} On October 19, 2017, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–9 vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2010-19-17.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – October 19, 2017, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 5, 2018, Trump announced his intent to renominate Farr to a federal judgeship.{{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-renomination-21-judicial-nominees/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Renomination of 21 Judicial Nominees}} On January 8, 2018, his renomination was sent to the Senate.{{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/nominations-sent-senate-today-2/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Nominations Sent to the Senate Today}} On January 18, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote. On November 28, 2018, the Senate invoked cloture on his nomination by a 51–50 vote, with Vice President Mike Pence casting the tie-breaking vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=2&vote=00249|title=On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on Thomas Alvin Farr, of North Carolina, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina)|website=senate.gov}} The following day, Republican senators Jeff Flake of Arizona and Tim Scott of South Carolina opposed to his nomination, joined all 49 Democratic senators who opposed his nomination as well, all assuring that his nomination will be rejected.{{cite web|last1=Dumain|first1=Emma|last2=Murphy|first2=Brian|url=https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article222386255.html|title=Scott to oppose Farr nomination to federal bench in NC, ending chances of confirmation|work=The State|date=November 29, 2018|access-date=November 29, 2018}} Farr's nomination was opposed by the Congressional Black Caucus due to Farr's role as a lawyer defending North Carolina voting restrictions which were struck down by a court as racially biased. During his Senate confirmation hearing, Farr said that he disagreed with the 4th Circuit panel's ruling and that "at the time our clients enacted those laws, I do not believe that they thought that were purposefully discriminating against African Americans." He said that if he is confirmed to the federal judiciary, he would follow the 4th Circuit's ruling.{{Cite news |date=September 21, 2017 |first=Anne |last=Blythe |url=https://www.charlotteobserver.com/article174539786.html |title=Trump pick for NC judge accused of 'hostile record on African-American voting rights and workers' rights' |work=The Charlotte Observer |access-date=April 13, 2023 |language=en}}{{Cite news|url=http://wunc.org/post/judicial-nominee-ill-follow-north-carolina-voter-id-ruling#stream/0|title=Judicial Nominee: I'll Follow North Carolina Voter ID Ruling|agency=Associated Press|access-date=October 19, 2017|language=en}} In 2019, the White House did not renominate Farr. Trump later nominated Richard E. Myers II in Farr's place, and Myers was confirmed on December 5, 2019.

• Gordon P. Giampietro: On December 20, 2017, Trump nominated Giampietro to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, to the seat vacated by Judge Rudolph T. Randa, who assumed senior status on February 5, 2016. On February 15, 2018, the web site BuzzFeed reported that Giampietro had made negative remarks about "calls for diversity", birth control, and gay marriage in blog comments and radio interviews. A spokesman for U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin called the statements "extremely troubling" and complained that they had not been provided to the Wisconsin Federal Nominating Commission, a bipartisan commission which vets federal judicial nominees.{{cite web|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/one-of-trumps-judicial-nominees-once-wrote-that-diversity|title=One Of Trump's Judicial Nominees Once Wrote That Diversity Is 'Code For Relaxed Standards' |date=February 15, 2018 |first=Zoe|last=Tillman|website=BuzzFeed News}} In response, Giampietro released his application to the Wisconsin federal nominating commission, which shows what questions he was asked by the state's federal nominating commission and the answers that he provided. Giampietro's supporters, including the Catholic League, have said they believe criticisms of his past comments have to do with his Catholic faith.{{cite news|last1=Glauber|first1=Bill|last2=Bice|first2=Daniel|title=Trump nominee Gordon Giampietro releases application in response to critics of his views|url=https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2018/03/01/trump-nominee-gordon-giampietro-releases-application-response-critics-his-controversial-views/385686002/|access-date=9 March 2018|publisher=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel|date=March 1, 2018}} In response, Baldwin withheld her blue slip.{{cite web|url=https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/27/catholic-bishops-call-tammy-baldwin-not-block-nomination-gordon-giampietro-federal-bench/377622002/ |title=Catholic bishops ask Tammy Baldwin not to block judicial nomination of Gordon Giampietro |website=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel |access-date=April 13, 2023 |first1=Bill |last1=Glauber |first2=Daniel |last2=Bice |date=February 27, 2018 }} In 2019, the White House did not renominate him. Trump later nominated Brett H. Ludwig in Giampietro's place, and Ludwig was confirmed on September 9, 2020.

• John M. O'Connor: On April 10, 2018, Trump nominated O'Connor to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Courts of Northern, Eastern, and Western districts of Oklahoma. He was nominated to the seat vacated by Judge James H. Payne, who assumed senior status on August 1, 2017.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/ten-nominations-sent-senate-today-2/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Ten Nominations Sent to the Senate Today}} On July 11, 2018, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/07/11/2018/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=July 11, 2018 }} During his hearings Senator Kamala Harris said the Judiciary Committee should not have moved forward with O'Connor's nomination before the ABA released its rating.{{Cite web |url=https://newsok.com/article/5601074/john-oconnor-an-oklahoma-judicial-nominee-faces-questions-about-tulsa-mens-club |title=John O'Connor, an Oklahoma judicial nominee, faces questions about Tulsa men's club |date=2018-07-12 |website=NewsOK.com |language=en-US |access-date=2018-11-11}} On August 21, 2018, the American Bar Association rated O'Connor "not qualified."{{cite news |last1=Wingerter |first1=Justin |title=Oklahoma judicial nominee John O'Connor is unqualified, Bar Association says |url=https://newsok.com/article/5605552/oklahoma-judicial-nominee-john-oconnor-is-unqualified-bar-association-says |access-date=September 9, 2018 |publisher=NewsOK |date=August 22, 2018}} Two complaints about O'Connor had been filed with the Oklahoma Bar Association, although neither complaint resulted in public discipline and he remains an attorney in good standing.{{Cite web |url=https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/federal-judge-nominee-from-tulsa-has-bar-association-complaints-was/article_2406fcb9-137e-5389-a1a8-f939129eebac.html |title=Federal judge nominee from Tulsa has bar association complaints, was sued by client |last=Wingerter |first=Justin |date=2018-10-01 |website=Tulsa World |language=en |access-date=2018-11-11}} He was not renominated in 2019, and withdrew his name for consideration for re-nomination on April 12, 2019. Trump later nominated John F. Heil III in O'Connor's place, and Heil was confirmed on May 20, 2020.

• Michael S. Bogren: On March 8, 2019, Trump agreed to nominate Borgen as a Federal Trial Judge at the urging of U.S. Senators Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters. However, his nomination drew criticism from Republicans and conservatives. A particular point of contention was when Bogren represented the city of East Lansing, which barred two married Christian farmers from selling their goods at the local farmers' market because after they refused to a host a same-sex marriage on their farm citing religious beliefs. While making his case, Bogren equated the farmers to the Ku Klux Klan and radical Muslims who oppose letting women drive.{{Cite web |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/11/trump-judicial-nominee-withdraws-1361504 |title=Trump judicial nominee withdraws amid GOP opposition |last1=Levine |first1=Marianne |last2=Johnson |first2=Eliana |website=Politico |date=June 11, 2019 |language=en |access-date=2019-06-12}} While Bogren claimed he was merely defending his client, his critics said his remarks went far beyond the bounds of fair comment and showed anti-Christian bias, thus proving that he did not have the temperament to judge cases impartially. On June 11, 2019, Bogren withdrew his nomination. The White House formally sent a notice of the withdrawal of Bogren's nomination to the Senate on June 26, 2019. Trump later nominated Oakland County Circuit Court Judge Hala Y. Jarbou in Bogren's place, and Jarbou was confirmed on September 10, 2020.

• Kevin R. Sweazea: On May 29, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Sweazea to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. On June 12, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Trump nominated Sweazea to the seat vacated by Judge Robert C. Brack, who assumed senior status on July 25, 2018.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/six-nominations-two-withdrawals-sent-senate/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Six Nominations and Two Withdrawals Sent to the Senate}} On October 29, 2019 it was announced that Sweazea withdrew his nomination after New Mexico's two senators, Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich, withdrew their initial support for him.{{Cite web |url=https://apnews.com/7a29f7b642394820894dc87dbaf7ba6d |title=Judge withdraws from consideration for District Court seat |date=2019-10-29 |website= AP News |access-date=2019-11-22}} His nomination was returned on January 3, 2020. Trump later nominated Fred Joseph Federici III in Sweazea's place.
• Fred Joseph Federici III : On May 28, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Federici to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, after being recommended by a bipartisan commission set up by New Mexico's two U.S. senators. On June 18, 2020, his nomination was sent to the Senate. A career federal lawyer with 25 years of experience, Federici drew no controversy. But in mid-September 2020, both senators, Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich, withdrew their blue slips to protest the pre-election hearings of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court weeks before the November 2020 general elections.{{Cite web|url=https://www.law360.com/articles/1314408/dem-sens-blocking-trial-court-picks-amid-high-court-fight|title=Dem Sens. Blocking Trial Court Picks Amid High Court Fight - Law360|website=law360.com}} President Biden later nominated Margaret Strickland and she was confirmed on September 21, 2021.
• Brenda M. Saiz: On May 28, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Saiz to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. On June 18, 2020, her nomination was sent to the Senate. President Trump nominated Saiz to the seat vacated by Judge Judith C. Herrera, who assumed senior status on July 1, 2019.[https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/eight-nominations-sent-senate-4/ "Eight Nominations Sent to the Senate", White House, June 18, 2020] An experienced lawyer specializing in trucking and railroad law, Said was unanimously rated "well-qualified" by the American Bar Association and drew no controversy. But in mid-September 2020, both senators, Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich, withdrew the blue slips to protest the pre-election hearings of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court weeks before the November 2020 general elections. President Biden later nominated Matthew L. Garcia and he was confirmed on February 14, 2023.

• Jeremy B. Rosen: On October 10, 2018, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Rosen to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Democrats claimed that Rosen was a conservative ideologue. Rosen's supporters pointed out that he is a well-regarded appellate lawyer and that many Democrats in the California legal community support him.{{Cite web|url=https://dailyjournal.com/articles/355234-us-judge-nominee-appears-stalled-over-his-affiliation-with-federalist-society|title=DailyJournal|website=dailyjournal.com}} On November 13, 2018, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Senator Kamala Harris refused to turn in her blue slip consenting to the nomination. His nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Judge Hernán D. Vera in Rosen's place and he was confirmed on June 13, 2023.
• Rick Richmond: On August 28, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Richmond to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On October 17, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. The nomination was objected to by progressives, noting his longtime membership in the Federalist Society and his past contributions to Republicans seeking elective office, including President.{{Cite web |url=https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=rick+richmond |title=Donor Lookup |work=OpenSecrets |access-date=April 13, 2023 }} U.S. Senator Kamala Harris withheld her blue slip from the nomination, leaving his nomination stalled. His nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett in Richmond's place and she was confirmed on April 27, 2022.
• Sandy N. Leal: On August 28, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Orange County Superior Court Judge Leal to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Her nomination was part of a bipartisan package of nominees which included Shireen Matthews, who was recommended by Senator Kamala Harris.{{Cite press release |date=August 28, 2019 |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-united-states-marshal-nominee-4/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees and United States Marshal Nominee}} On October 17, 2019, her nomination was sent to the Senate. President Trump nominated Leal to the seat vacated by Judge Christina A. Snyder, who assumed senior status on November 23, 2016. Leal's nomination drew no strong objections, but Senator Kamala Harris refused to submit her blue slip consenting to the nomination, leaving it stalled. His nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong in Leal's place and she was confirmed on December 17, 2021.
• Steve Kim: On November 21, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Kim was nominated to succeed Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell, who died on October 8, 2017. Kim was nominated as part of a bipartisan package of nominees including John W. Holcomb, Michelle M. Pettit, and Todd W. Robinson. A registered Democrat with an apolitical reputation and experience in technology and forensics law, Kim generated no controversy and was considered a consensus nominee.https://vettingroom.org/tag/judge-steve-kim/ On February 13, 2020, his nomination was sent to the Senate.[https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/eleven-nominations-sent-senate-2/ "Eleven Nominations Sent to the Senate", White House, February 13, 2020] However, California's two Democratic U.S. Senators withdrew their blue slip to protest the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court. On January 3, 2021, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate.{{Cite web |date=2021-01-03 |title=PN1533 - Nomination of Steve Kim for The Judiciary, 116th Congress (2019–2020) |url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/1533 |access-date=2021-01-05 |website=www.congress.gov}}

• Dirk B. Paloutzian: On April 29, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Paloutzian to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. On May 21, 2020, his nomination was sent to the United States Senate.{{cite press release |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-11/ |title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees |date=April 29, 2020 |access-date=April 13, 2023 |work=whitehouse.gov }} He received a rating of "well qualified" from the American Bar Association{{cite web |url=https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/government_affairs_office/webratingchart-trump116.pdf |publisher=American Bar Association |work=Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary |title=Ratings of Article III and Article IV Judicial Nominees: 116th Congress |date=December 15, 2020 |access-date=13 April 2023 }} and drew no strong objections, but Senator Kamala Harris refused to submit a blue slip consenting to the nomination, leaving it stalled. His nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Ana de Alba in Paloutzian's place and she was confirmed on June 21, 2022.
• James P. Arguelles: On June 8, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Arguelles to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. On June 18, 2020, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Arguelles did not generate any strong objections, but Senator Kamala Harris refused to submit a blue slip consenting to the nomination, leaving it stalled. His nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Judge Jennifer L. Thurston in Arguelles' place and she was confirmed on December 17, 2021.

• Adam L. Braverman: On August 28, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to nominate former U.S. Attorney Braverman to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On October 17, 2019, his nomination was sent to the U.S. Senate. His nomination drew condemnation from progressives, who condemned him for implementing the zero-tolerance policy towards illegal aliens ordered by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Others attacked Braverman for pursuing federal marijuana-related cases, even in jurisdictions where they were legal under state laws.{{Cite web|url=https://vettingroom.org/2020/03/23/adam-braverman/|title=Adam Braverman – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California|first=Harsh|last=Voruganti|date=March 23, 2020}} Braverman and his supporters claimed he was just following the law. In response, U.S. Senator Kamala Harris refused to turn in her blue slip consenting to the nomination, leaving it stalled. His nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Federal Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez and she was confirmed on December 17, 2021.
• Shireen Matthews: On August 28, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Matthews to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On October 17, 2019, her nomination was sent to the Senate. President Trump nominated Matthews to the seat vacated by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz, who assumed senior status on January 23, 2019. Matthews was nominated as part of a bipartisan package of nominees which included Adam Braverman and Rick Richmond. A registered Democrat{{cite web | url=https://vettingroom.org/2020/03/27/r-shireen-matthews/ | title=R. Shireen Matthews – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California | date=March 27, 2020 }} and former Federal prosecutor with an apolitical record, she personally generated no controversy. However, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris withdrew support for the package in late 2020 to protest the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before the 2020 general elections, so the Senate never voted on her nomination. President Joe Biden later nominated Jinsook Ohta in Matthews' place and she was confirmed on December 17, 2021.

• David C. Woll Jr.: On August 12, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Woll to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. On September 8, 2020, his nomination was sent to the Senate. Woll immediately drew opposition. In 2007, Woll had been one of the attorneys hired by DOJ attorney Monica Goodling as part of a politicized hiring process she conducted, though he personally wasn't accused of wrongdoing. He also worked at the HUD, and was accused of improperly withholding aid to Puerto Rico after a hurricane and failing to comply with a congressional subpoena on the topic on schedule.{{Cite web|url=https://vettingroom.org/2020/09/04/david-woll/|title=David Woll – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York|first=Harsh|last=Voruganti|date=September 4, 2020}} In response, New York's U.S. senators, Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, refused to turn in blue slips consenting to his nomination. His nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Nina Morrison in Woll's place, who was confirmed on June 8, 2022.
• Saritha Komatireddy: On February 12, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Komatireddy to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Komatireddy was nominated as part of a bipartisan package of nominees which included Jennifer H. Rearden.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-united-states-marshal-nominee-6/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees and United States Marshal Nominee}} A career Justice Department lawyer, Komatireddy drew no strong objections. But after President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett for the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before the 2020 Presidential election, New York's two Democratic U.S. senators, Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, withdrew their blue slips for Komatireddy and some of Trump's other nominees for New York. Her nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. President Joe Biden later nominated Nusrat Jahan Choudhury in Komatireddy's place and she was confirmed on June 15, 2023.

• Iris Lan: On November 6, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Lan to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On December 2, 2019, her nomination was sent to the U.S. Senate, and on January 3, 2020, it was returned to the Senate per normal protocol. A well-respected justice department lawyer with an apolitical record,{{Cite web|url=https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1999/6/10/renaissance-woman-keeps-on-runnin-piris/|title=Renaissance Woman Keeps on Runnin' | News | The Harvard Crimson|website=thecrimson.com}} Lan was unanimously rated as "Well-Qualified" by the American Bar Association,{{cite web |url= https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/government_affairs_office/webratingchart-trump116.pdf?logActivity=true|title= STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY |date= December 1, 2020|website=americanbar.org|access-date=2020-12-04}} and considered a consensus nominee. On May 4, 2020, her renomination was sent to the Senate, along with the nomination of two other New York City-area District Judge nominees, Jennifer Rearden and Saritha Komatireddy, the president's intention to nominate both of whom was announced on February 12, 2020, to create a package for blue-slip consideration.{{Cite web|title=Thirty Nominations and One Withdrawal Sent to the Senate|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/thirty-nominations-one-withdrawal-sent-senate/|access-date=2020-11-08|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|language=en-US}} However, in light of the Presidential election, the New York Senators stopped returning blue slips for nominees, stalled these nominations.{{Cite web|last=Andrew Kragie|title=Dem Sens. Blocking Trial Court Picks Amid High Court Fight - Law360|url=https://www.law360.com/articles/1314408/dem-sens-blocking-trial-court-picks-amid-high-court-fight|access-date=2020-11-08|website=law360.com|language=en}}{{Cite web|last=Andrew Kragie|title=McConnell Aims To Fill 7th Circ., 1st Circ. Seats In Lame Duck - Law360|url=https://www.law360.com/articles/1324618/mcconnell-aims-to-fill-7th-circ-1st-circ-seats-in-lame-duck|access-date=2020-11-08|website=law360.com|language=en}} Her nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. On September 30, 2021, President Biden nominated the controversial Dale Ho in Lan's place and he was narrowly confirmed on June 14, 2023.
• Jennifer H. Rearden: On February 12, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Rearden to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. She was strongly recommended by U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and the White House nominated her as part of a bipartisan package of nominees. On May 4, 2020, her nomination was sent to the Senate. President Trump nominated Rearden to the seat vacated by Judge Richard J. Sullivan, who was elevated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on October 25, 2018.[https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/thirty-nominations-one-withdrawal-sent-senate/ "Thirty Nominations and One Withdrawal Sent to the Senate", The White House, May 4, 2020] However, after the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court, Gillibrand and Chuck Schumer withdrew their support for the Republican nominees in the package in protest, so the Republican-controlled Senate did not act on Readen's nomination. Her nomination was returned at the end of the 116th United States Congress. On January 19, 2022, she was renominated to the same seat by President Biden and was confirmed on September 8, 2022.

• Mark Norris: On July 13, 2017, Trump nominated Norris to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, to the seat vacated by Judge J. Daniel Breen, who assumed senior status on March 18, 2017.{{cite web|url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/07/13/ten-nominations-sent-senate-today|title=" Ten Nominations Sent to the Senate Today" White House, July 13, 2017|access-date=April 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170714065923/https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/07/13/ten-nominations-sent-senate-today|archive-date=July 14, 2017|url-status=dead }} Prior to his appointment, Norris was publicly considering a candidacy for governor of Tennessee in 2018.{{cite web |first=Joel |last=Ebert |url=http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2017/06/12/sen-mark-norris-being-vetted-appointment-federal-judgeship/388904001/ |title=Sen. Mark Norris being vetted for appointment to federal judgeship |work=USA Today |date=June 12, 2017 }}{{cite web |first=Otis |last=Sanford |url=https://eu.commercialappeal.com/story/opinion/columnists/otis-sanford/2017/01/14/mark-norris-has-steep-trek-tennessee-governorship/96469620/ |title=Mark Norris has steep trek to Tennessee governorship |work=Commercial Appeal |date=January 14, 2017 }} Trump's nomination of Norris was supported by Republican Senators Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker of Tennessee,{{cite news |first=Andy |last=Sher |url=http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/politics/state/story/2017/jul/13/trump-nominates-tennessee-senate-majority-leader-norris-federal-judgeship/438179/ |title=Trump nominates Tennessee Senate Majority Leader Norris for federal judgeship |work=Times Free Press |date=July 13, 2017 }} but criticized by former U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin, who described Norris as one of a number of "the least qualified and most bizarre" of Trump's judicial appointments. In a New York Times op-ed, Scheindlin criticized Norris for suggesting that "being Muslim is synonymous with being a terrorist" and for leading efforts to bar local governments from removing public monuments to the Confederacy.Shira A. Scheindlin, [https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/09/opinion/trump-judges-courts.html Trump's Crazy Choices for the Courts], New York Times (November 9, 2017). On November 1, 2017, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/11/01/2017/nominations|title=Nominations - United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=November 2017 }} During the hearing, Norris said in response to a question from Senator Amy Klobuchar that he viewed the case Obergefell v. Hodges (determining that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry) as settled law.{{cite web |first=Michael |last=Collins |url=https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2017/11/01/judicial-nominee-mark-norris-tells-senate-panel-gay-marriage-settled-law/822189001/ |title=Judicial nominee Mark Norris tells Senate panel that gay marriage is settled law |work=The Tennessean |date=November 1, 2017 }} On December 7, 2017 his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–9 vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2012-07-17.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – December 7, 2017, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 5, 2018, Trump announced his intent to renominate Norris to a federal judgeship. On January 8, 2018, his renomination was sent to the Senate. On January 18, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote. On October 11, 2018, the United States Senate confirmed his nomination was confirmed by a 51–44 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=2&vote=00237|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Mark Saalfield Norris, Sr., of Tennessee, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee)|website=senate.gov}}

• Patrick Wyrick: On April 10, 2018, Trump nominated Wyrick, an Oklahoma Supreme Court justice, to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.{{cite web |title=Presidential Nomination 1812, 115th United States Congress |date=April 10, 2018 |url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/115th-congress/1812 |publisher=United States Congress |access-date=June 30, 2018}} He was nominated to the seat vacated by Judge David Lynn Russell, who assumed senior status on July 7, 2013. On May 23, 2018, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee,{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/05/23/2018/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=May 23, 2018 }} and Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse questioned him about an exchange he had with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor during a 2015 death penalty case before the court.{{cite news |last1=Wingerter |first1=Justin |title=Patrick Wyrick, state Supreme Court justice, faces flak over ties to Devon Energy, his residency and Sotomayor's rebuke |url=https://oklahoman.com/article/5595710/patrick-wyrick-state-supreme-court-justice-faces-flak-over-ties-to-devon-energy-his-residency-and-sotomayors-rebuke |access-date=13 June 2019 |publisher=The Oklahoman |date=May 24, 2018}} On June 14, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2006-14-18.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – June 14, 2018, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On April 9, 2019, he was confirmed by a 53–47 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00068|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Patrick R. Wyrick, of Oklahoma, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Oklahoma)|website=senate.gov}}

• J. Campbell Barker: On January 23, 2018, Trump nominated Barker to the seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated by Judge Leonard Davis, who retired on May 15, 2015.{{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/four-nominations-sent-senate-today-6/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Four Nominations Sent to the Senate Today}} On May 9, 2018, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee. On June 7, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/06-07-18%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – June 7, 2018|publisher=United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|access-date=June 8, 2023}} Opponents of Campbell's nomination included the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and Democratic Senator Chris Coons.{{Cite web |url=https://civilrights.org/resource/oppose-confirmation-j-campbell-barker-u-s-district-court-eastern-district-texas/ |title=Oppose the Confirmation of J. Campbell Barker to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas - The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights |website=The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights |language=en-US |access-date=2019-04-09}}{{Cite tweet |number=1010195026004017153 |user=chriscoons |title=J. Campbell Barker, nominated to be a judge in the Eastern District of Texas, defended a Mississippi law that allows business owners to discriminate against #LGBT couples. Judiciary Democrats voted no. #PrideMonth #CourtsMatter |date=June 22, 2018}} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced his intent to renominate Barker for a federal judgeship. His nomination was sent to the Senate later that day. On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On May 1, 2019, the United States Senate confirmed him by a 51–47 vote.[https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00085 On the Nomination (Confirmation J. Campbell Barker, of Texas, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas)], United States Senate, May 1, 2019
• Michael J. Truncale: On January 23, 2018, Trump nominated Truncale to the seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated by Judge Ron Clark, who assumed senior status on February 28, 2018. On April 25, 2018 a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/04/25/2018/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=April 25, 2018 }} On May 24, 2018 his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/05-24-18%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – May 24, 2018, Senate Judiciary Committee}} Under questioning by Democratic U.S. Senator Mazie Hirono, Truncale, who previously served as an election judge in Texas, said he had personally witnessed incidents of voter fraud. Hirono challenged him, saying that she did not believe the problem of voter fraud to be widespread.{{Cite web |url=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/25/michael-truncale-trump-judicial-pick-saw-voter-fra/ |title=Michael Truncale, Trump judicial pick, saw voter fraud |last=Swoyer |first=Alex |date=2018-04-25 |website=The Washington Times |language=en-US |access-date=2018-11-11}} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced his intent to renominate Truncale for a federal judgeship. His nomination was sent to the Senate later that day. On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On May 14, 2019, his nomination was confirmed by the Senate in a 49–46 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00108|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Michael J. Truncale, of Texas, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas)|website=senate.gov}} Senator Mitt Romney voted against him because he called Barack Obama an "un-American imposter" in 2011. Truncale said he was "merely expressing frustration by what I perceived as a lack of overt patriotism on behalf of President Obama.'"{{Cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/14/romney-truncale-1321299|title=Romney rejects Trump judicial pick who smeared Obama|last=Everett|first=Burgess|website=Politico|language=en|date=May 14, 2019|access-date=May 14, 2019}}

• Wendy Vitter: On January 23, 2018, Trump nominated Vitter to the seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana vacated by Judge Helen Ginger Berrigan, who assumed senior status on August 23, 2016.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/5704/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Fifth Wave of Judicial Candidates}} On April 11, 2018, a hearing on her nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/04/11/2018/nominations-1|title=Nominations - United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=April 11, 2018 }} During her hearing before the Judiciary Committee, Vitter was questioned closely by Democrats about her previous anti-abortion and anti-birth control advocacy. In her position as general counsel of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans, Vitter had promoted unsubstantiated claims about health dangers linked to the birth control pill. During her Senate hearing, Vitter distanced herself from these claims and promised to uphold Roe v. Wade.{{cite news |last=Totenberg|first=Nina|date=April 11, 2018|title=Wendy Vitter, Wife Of 'D.C. Madam' Senator, Faces Thorny Hearing To Be Federal Judge|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/04/11/601323110/wendy-vitter-wife-of-d-c-madam-senator-faces-thorny-hearing-to-be-federal-judge|work=NPR|access-date=April 11, 2018}}{{cite news|last=Totenberg|first=Nina|title=Judicial Nominee Wendy Vitter Gets Tough Questions On Birth Control And Abortion|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/04/11/601323110/wendy-vitter-wife-of-d-c-madam-senator-faces-thorny-hearing-to-be-federal-judge|access-date=April 11, 2018|work=NPR|date=April 11, 2018}} On January 3, 2019, her nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced his intent to renominate Vitter for a federal judgeship. Her nomination was sent to the Senate later that day. On February 7, 2019, her nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On May 16, 2019, her nomination was confirmed by a 52–45 vote.[https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00114 On the Nomination (Confirmation Wendy Vitter, of Louisiana, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana)], United States Senate, May 16, 2019

• Howard C. Nielson Jr.: On September 28, 2017, Trump nominated Nielson to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Utah, to the seat vacated by Judge Ted Stewart, who assumed senior status on September 1, 2014. A hearing on his nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was held on January 10, 2018.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/01/10/2018/nominations|title=United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=January 10, 2018 }} On February 8, the Judiciary Committee voted for Nielson by an 11–10 vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2002-08-18.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – February 8, 2018, Senate Judiciary Committee}} Democrats on the committee opposed Nielson over his role in defending California's Proposition 8 and his role in reviewing two torture memos in 2004 and 2006 when he was serving as a deputy assistant general at the Office of Legal Counsel for the Justice Department.{{cite news|last1=Swoyer|first1=Alex|title=Republicans clear judicial nominee over accusations of anti-LGBT bias|url=https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/8/republicans-clear-judicial-nominee-howard-nielson-/|access-date=10 February 2018|work=The Washington Times|date=February 8, 2018}} Nielson claimed that he was a junior counsel in the Proposition 8 controversy and the lead counsel made decisions on legal tactics.{{citation needed|date=May 2019}} On March 6, 2018, Senator Tammy Duckworth put a hold on his nomination.{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/executive_calendar/2018/03_07_2018.pdf|title="Executive Calendar: Wednesday, March 7, 2018, "Notice of Intent to Object", United States Senate}} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced his intent to renominate Nielson for a federal judgeship. His nomination was sent to the Senate later that day. On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On May 22, 2019, his nomination was confirmed by a 51–47 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00123|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Howard C. Nielson, Jr., of Utah, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Utah)|website=senate.gov}}

• Stephen R. Clark: On April 10, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Clark to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. On April 12, 2018, his nomination was sent to the Senate. He was nominated to the seat vacated by Judge Carol E. Jackson, who retired on August 31, 2017. On July 11, 2018, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee. On September 13, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09-13-18%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – September 13, 2018 Senate Judiciary Committee}} Democrats have opposed his nomination due to disagreements with Clark's positions on abortion and LGBT rights.{{cite news |last1=Raasch |first1=Chuck |title=Controversial Trump judicial nominee could get Senate vote soon as a result of Blunt effort to cut debate time |url=https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/controversial-trump-judicial-nominee-could-get-senate-vote-soon-as/article_d6b5e11b-e24d-58ae-ac18-eb9d37f46d69.html |access-date=10 April 2019 |publisher=St. Louis Post Dispatch |date=April 8, 2019}} Clark stated that his statements on sensitive issues were his personal opinions and that as a judge he would follow the law and Supreme Court precedent. Republicans also pointed out that he was supported by U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill, a Democrat from Clark's home state.{{citation needed|date=May 2019}} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced his intent to renominate Clark for a federal judgeship. His nomination was sent to the Senate later that day. On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On May 22, 2019, his nomination was confirmed by a 53–45 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00124|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Stephen R. Clark, Sr., of Missouri, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri)|website=senate.gov}}
• Sarah Pitlyk: On August 14, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Pitlyk to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. On September 9, 2019, her nomination was sent to the Senate. Trump nominated Pitlyk to the seat vacated by Judge Catherine D. Perry, who assumed senior status on December 31, 2018.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/seventeen-nominations-two-withdrawals-sent-senate/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Seventeen Nominations and Two Withdrawals Sent to the Senate}} On September 24, 2019, the American Bar Association (ABA) rated Pitlyk as "Not Qualified." The ABA said Pitlyk's rating was based on her lack of trial experience.{{cite web |first1=Ariane |last1=de Vogue |first2=Alex |last2=Rogers |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics/american-bar-association-nominees-vandyke/index.html |title='Not qualified' rating and accusation from American Bar Association moves Trump nominee to tears |work=CNN |date=2019-10-31 |access-date=2019-12-05}} The ABA's rating drew criticism and charges of ideological bias from several Republican senators.{{cite news|url=http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/gop-senators-criticize-aba-ratings-during-hearing-for-nominee-rated-not-qualified|work=ABA Journal|title=GOP senators clash over ABA during hearing for judicial nominee rated 'not qualified'|first=Debra |last=Cassens Weiss|date=September 26, 2019|access-date=October 9, 2019}} Pitlyk said one reason for her somewhat limited experience in trial and deposition work is that she has been a member of legal teams that have allowed her to arrange her schedule in order to spend more time with her children.{{cite news|url=https://www.courthousenews.com/democrats-grill-pick-for-missouri-court-on-anti-abortion-work/|work=Courthouse News|title=Democrats Grill Pick for Missouri Court on Anti-Abortion Work|first=Tim |last=Ryan|date=September 25, 2019|access-date=October 9, 2019}} On September 25, 2019, a hearing on her nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/09/25/2019/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=September 25, 2019 }} At the hearing, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin expressed concerns about Pitlyk's lack of trial experience, and other Democratic senators including Richard Blumenthal asked her about her views on abortion; she responded that her personal views would not affect her work as a judge. As a lawyer, Pitlyk had argued that frozen embryos from in vitro fertilization should legally be considered human beings, and she wrote an amicus brief stating that "surrogacy has grave effects on society."{{cite news|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-march-of-the-hard-right-judges-the-latest-nominee-opposes-in-vitro-fertilization|work=The Daily Beast|title=Trump's March of the Hard-Right Judges: The Latest Nominee Opposes In-Vitro Fertilization: Last week brought the confirmation hearing for St. Louis' Sarah Pitlyk, who takes her pro-life views a little further than most.|first=Eleanor |last=Clift|date=October 1, 2019|access-date=October 9, 2019}} On October 31, 2019, her nomination was reported out of committee by a party-line 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/103119%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – October 31, 2019, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On December 3, 2019, the United States Senate invoked cloture on her nomination by a 50–43 vote,{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00371 |title=On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture: Sarah E. Pitlyk to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri) |date=December 3, 2019|website=United States Senate|access-date=December 4, 2019|language=en}} with Maine senator Susan Collins voted against her nomination.{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/04/trump-nominee-who-is-anti-ivf-surrogacy-was-deemed-unqualified-she-just-got-confirmed/ |title=Trump nominee who is anti-IVF and surrogacy was deemed unqualified. She was just confirmed. |first=Reis |last=Thebault |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=December 4, 2019 |access-date=December 5, 2019 }} On December 4, 2019, her nomination was confirmed by a 49–44 vote.[https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00379 On the Nomination (Confirmation: Sarah E. Pitlyk, of Missouri, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri)]

• Matthew J. Kacsmaryk: On September 7, 2017, Trump nominated Kacsmaryk to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, to the seat vacated by Judge Mary Lou Robinson, who assumed senior status on February 3, 2016. On December 13, 2017 a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/12/13/2017/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=December 13, 2017 }} On January 3, 2018 his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate.{{Cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2018/1/3/daily-digest|title=Congress.gov | Library of Congress|website=congress.gov}} On January 5, 2018, Trump announced his intent to renominate Kacsmaryk to a federal judgeship. On January 8, 2018, his renomination was sent to the Senate. On January 18, 2018 his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote. Senate Democrats oppose his nomination due to his writings and negative comments on LGBT rights and women's contraceptive rights.{{Cite web |url=https://www.statesman.com/news/20180119/texan-gets-panels-nod-for-federal-judge-post-over-democrats-objections |title=Texan gets panel's nod for federal judge post over Democrats' objections |last=Recio |first=Maria |date=2018-01-19 |publisher=Austin American-Statesman |language=en |access-date=2018-11-10}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/how-the-texas-legislature-will-work-in-2019-11343704 |title=What to Expect From the New-Look Texas Legislature |last=Young |first=Stephen |date=2018-01-19 |website=Dallas Observer |access-date=2018-11-11}} On January 3, 2019, his nomination was once again returned to the President. On January 23, 2019, Trump announced his intent to renominate Kacsmaryk for a federal judgeship. His nomination was sent to the Senate later that day. On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote. On June 18, 2019, the United States Senate invoked cloture on his nomination by a 52–44 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1161/vote_116_1_00168.htm|title=On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture: Matthew J. Kacsmaryk to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Texas)|website=senate.gov}} On June 19, 2019, his nomination was confirmed by a 52–46 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00172|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, of Texas, to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Texas)|website=senate.gov}}

• Kathryn Kimball Mizelle: On August 12, 2020, President Donald Trump announced his intent to nominate Mizelle to serve as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.{{Cite web|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Judicial Nominees|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-judicial-nominees-081220/|access-date=August 12, 2020|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|language=en-US}} On September 8, 2020, her nomination was sent to the Senate to fill the seat vacated by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, who assumed senior status on July 12, 2020.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/eleven-nominations-three-withdrawals-sent-senate/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Eleven Nominations and Three Withdrawals Sent to the Senate}} The American Bar Association rated Mizelle "Not Qualified" to serve as a federal trial court judge, noting that "Since her admission to the bar Ms. Mizelle has not tried a case, civil or criminal, as lead or co-counsel."{{Cite web|title=Federal judicial nominee lacks enough experience, ABA says in letter explaining 'not qualified' rating|url=https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/federal-judicial-nominee-lacks-enough-experience-aba-says-in-letter-explaining-not-qualified-rating|access-date=October 14, 2020|website=ABA Journal|language=en}} She was the 8th Trump appointee to the federal bench rated as "Not Qualified" by the ABA's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary. Before her appointment, the nominee had only taken part in two trials — both one-day trials in a state court conducted while she was still in law school. According to the ABA, Mizelle had roughly five years of trial experience at the time of her nomination; the ABA typically requires twelve years in order to give a nominee a rating of "Qualified". The ABA conceded that Mizelle "has a very keen intellect, a strong work ethic and an impressive resume ... her integrity and demeanor are not in question."{{cite news |last1=September 9 |first1=Jacqueline Thomsen | title=Jones Day Associate, Former Thomas Clerk 'Not Qualified' for Federal Bench, ABA Says |url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2020/09/09/jones-day-associate-former-thomas-clerk-not-qualified-for-federal-bench-aba-says/ |access-date=October 13, 2020 |work=National Law Journal |date=September 9, 2020 |language=en}} But, the committee wrote, "These attributes...simply do not compensate for the short time she has actually practiced law and her lack of meaningful trial experience." At the age of 33, she is the youngest judge chosen by Trump for a lifetime appointment.{{cite news |last1=Thomsen |first1=Jacqueline |title=Lame Duck Senate Confirms Trump's Youngest Judge Yet |url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2020/11/18/lame-duck-senate-confirms-trumps-youngest-judge-yet/ |access-date=November 19, 2020 |work=National Law Journal |date=November 18, 2020}}{{cite web | last1=Thalji | first1=Jamal | title=Senate confirms Trump's youngest federal judge to serve in Tampa | url=https://www.tampabay.com/news/breaking-news/2020/11/18/senate-confirms-trumps-youngest-federal-judge-to-serve-in-tampa/ | date=November 19, 2020 | work=Tampa Bay Times | access-date=November 20, 2020}}{{cite web | last1=Allassan | first1=Fadel | title=Senate confirms Trump's youngest judicial pick as GOP breaks tradition | url=https://www.axios.com/senate-trump-young-judicial-nominee-confirm-c4fd5512-db6c-4fce-8762-375918edb3a5.html | date=November 19, 2020 | work=Axios | access-date=November 20, 2020}} On September 9, 2020, a hearing on her nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/09/09/2020/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=September 9, 2020 }} On October 22, 2020, her nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–0 vote, with all Democratic senators boycotting it.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%20October%2022,%202020.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – October 22, 2020, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On November 18, 2020, her nomination was confirmed by a 49–41 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00239|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, of Florida, to be United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida)|website=senate.gov}} She joined the first group of confirmed judicial appointments tendered by a president who has lost reelection since 1896, with the single exception of Jimmy Carter's appointment of Stephen Breyer to the First Circuit Court of Appeals in November 1980.{{cite news |url=https://www.tampabay.com/news/breaking-news/2020/11/18/senate-confirms-trumps-youngest-federal-judge-to-serve-in-tampa/ |title=Senate confirms Trump's youngest federal judge to serve in Tampa |work=Tampa Bay Times |first=Jamal |last=Thalji |date=November 18, 2020 |access-date=November 19, 2020 }}{{cite news |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-gop-defy-precedent-with-lame-duck-judicial-confirmations |title=Trump, GOP Defy Precedent with Lame Duck Judicial Appointees (1) |work=Bloomberg Law |first1=Madison |last1=Alder |first2=Seth |last2=Stern |first3=John |last3=Crawley |date=November 18, 2020 |access-date=November 20, 2020 }} Breyer had been confirmed by an 80–10 vote.{{cite web |url=https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/96-1980/s1021 |title=To Confirm the Nomination of Stephen G. Breyer to be U.S. Circuit Judge. (Motion Passed) |work=Govtrack |date=December 9, 1980 |access-date=November 19, 2020 }}

• J. Philip Calabrese: On February 26, 2020, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Calabrese to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. On March 3, 2020, his nomination was sent to the Senate. A Judge for the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas and formerly a successful lawyer at a prominent Cleveland, Ohio law firm, Calabrese was not expected to be controversial. But he came under fire from animal rights groups and some progressives for doing legal work for Cavel International Inc., the last horse slaughterhouse in the United States, in seeking to block Illinois regulations that would have shut down the business. Calabrese drew even more criticism for representing CEO of the Ohio coal company Murray Energy, which sued the Chagrin Valley Times, a local newspaper, for a defamation after it criticized Murray for firing 156 employees. A federal appeals court found the lawsuit constituted legal harassment, though Calabrese was not personally accused of wrongdoing.{{Cite web|url=https://www.cleveland.com/open/2020/09/senate-committee-approves-three-ohio-federal-judge-candidates-after-members-voice-concerns-about-cuyahoga-countys-j-philip-calabrese.html|title=Senate Committee approves three Ohio federal judge candidates after members voice concerns about Cuyahoga County's J. Philip Calabrese|date=September 17, 2020|website=cleveland.com}} A hearing on his nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was held on July 29, 2020, and many senators were not impressed with his testimony. On September 17, 2020, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%20September%2017,%202020.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – September 17, 2020, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On December 1, 2020, his nomination was confirmed by a 58–35 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00243|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: J. Philip Calabrese, of Ohio, to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio)|website=senate.gov}}

• Stephen S. Schwartz: on June 7, 2017, President Trump nominated Washington, D.C., lawyer Schwartz to serve as a United States Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims, to the seat vacated by Judge Lynn J. Bush, who assumed senior status on October 21, 2013. On July 25, 2017, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on his nomination.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/07/25/2017/nominations|title=United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=judiciary.senate.gov|date=July 25, 2017 }} Democrats criticized him, claiming that Schwartz did not have enough courtroom experience to serve as a judge. His nomination was reported out of committee by a 11–9 vote on September 14, 2017.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09-14-17%20Results%20of%20Exeuctive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – September 14, 2017}} On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate.{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2018/1/3/1|title=Daily Digest|website=Congressional Record|date=January 3, 2018|access-date=January 13, 2018|archive-date=December 5, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181205003711/https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2018/1/3/1|url-status=dead}} On January 8, 2018, the White House renominated 21 of 26 federal judicial nominees who had been returned by the U.S. Senate. Schwartz was not among the 21 individuals who were renominated.{{cite news|last1=Dupree|first1=Jamie|title=Trump renominates two Georgians for federal judgeships|url=http://jamiedupree.blog.wsbradio.com/2018/01/05/trump-renominates-two-georgians-for-federal-judgeships/|access-date=January 5, 2018|publisher=Cox Media Group|work=WSB (AM)|date=January 5, 2018|archive-date=January 5, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180105233727/http://jamiedupree.blog.wsbradio.com/2018/01/05/trump-renominates-two-georgians-for-federal-judgeships/|url-status=dead}} David A. Tapp was nominated instead in Schwartz's place and subsequently confirmed. On October 2, 2019, Trump announced his intent to nominate Schwartz to another vacancy on that court. On October 17, 2019, his nomination was sent to the Senate. President Trump nominated Schwartz to the seat on the United States Court of Federal Claims vacated by Judge Marian Blank Horn, who assumed senior status on March 9, 2018.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/eighteen-nominations-sent-senate/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Eighteen Nominations Sent to the Senate}} On January 3, 2020, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the Senate.{{Cite web |url=https://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/1243 |title=PN1243 – Nomination of Stephen Sidney Schwartz for The Judiciary, 116th Congress (2019–2020) |date=January 3, 2020 |website=congress.gov |access-date=January 4, 2020}} On January 9, 2020, he was renominated to the same seat.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/seven-nominations-sent-senate-5/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=Seven Nominations Sent to the Senate}} On May 14, 2020, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/051420%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – May 14, 2020, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On December 7, 2020, the Senate invoked cloture on his nomination by a 48–46 vote.{{Cite web|title=On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture: Stephen Sidney Schwartz to be a Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims)|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00254|access-date=2020-12-16|website=www.senate.gov}} On December 8, 2020, his nomination was confirmed by a 49–47 vote.{{Cite web|title=On the Nomination (Confirmation: Stephen Sidney Schwartz, of Virginia, to be a Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims)|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00256|access-date=2020-12-16|website=www.senate.gov}}

• Damien M. Schiff: on May 8, 2017, Trump nominated Schiff, an attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, to serve as a United States Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims, to the seat vacated by Judge George W. Miller, who retired in 2013.{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2017/05/08/senate-section/article/S2819-2|title=Nominations|website=Congressional Record|date=May 8, 2017}} Schiff became controversial because of his lack of experience with the specific court. But he became the subject of negative publicity when it was revealed that he described U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy as a "judicial prostitute" in a blog posting he wrote in 2007.{{cite news|last1=Kim|first1=Seung Min|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/26/trump-judicial-nominee-justice-kennedy-slight-damien-schiff-238874|title=Trump nominee called Kennedy 'judicial prostitute'|work=Politico|date=May 26, 2017}} On July 13, 2017, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–9 vote.[https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting%2007-13-17.pdf Results of Executive Business Meeting – July 13, 2017 Senate Judiciary Committee] However, some Republican senators implied that they would oppose him on the floor. On January 3, 2018, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate. The White House did not renominate Schiff in 2018. Trump later nominated Richard Hertling in Schiff's place, and Hertling was confirmed on June 10, 2019.
• Maureen Ohlhausen: On January 23, 2018, Trump announced his intent to nominate Federal Trade Commissioner Ohlhausen to the United States Court of Federal Claims.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-tenth-wave-judicial-nominees/|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Tenth Wave of Judicial Nominees}} On January 24, 2018, her nomination was sent to the Senate. She was nominated to the seat vacated by Judge Lawrence J. Block, who retired on January 8, 2016.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/eight-nominations-sent-senate-today-4/ |date=January 24, 2018 |via=National Archives |work=whitehouse.gov |title=Eight Nominations Sent to the Senate Today |access-date=April 13, 2023 }} Her nomination immediately drew opposition from Democrats, who attacked her opposition to Net Neutrality and portrayed her as reflexively pro-corporation. On May 9, 2018, a hearing on her nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee. On June 7, 2018, her nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.{{cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/06-07-18%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting|date=June 7, 2018 |website= www.judiciary.senate.gov|access-date=2020-12-04}} In December 2018, Ohlhausen announced that she had withdrawn her nomination for the federal judiciary, opting instead to join the law firm of Baker Botts as partner and co-chair of the firm's antitrust practice.{{cite news |last1=Lovelace |first1=Ryan |title=FTC's Ohlhausen to Join Baker Botts, Bypassing Judicial Nomination |url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2018/12/06/ftcs-ohlhausen-to-join-baker-botts-bypassing-judicial-nomination/?slreturn=20181120210011 |access-date=21 December 2018 |publisher=National Law Journal |date=December 6, 2018}} Trump later nominated Edward H. Meyers in Ohlhausen's place, and Meyers was confirmed on September 22, 2020.

• List of federal judges appointed by Donald Trump
• Donald Trump Supreme Court candidates
• United States federal judge
• Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts
• Deaths of United States federal judges in active service

{{reflist|group="Note"}}

{{reflist|30em}}

{{Donald Trump}}

{{U.S. Presidents and the Judiciary}}

Trump, Donald

Judicial appointments