Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budd Wiener Park

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Budd Wiener Park}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Budd Wiener Park}})

Regional park that fails WP:GNG and is WP:MILL, All the sources I could find are local papers that briefly mention the park. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
• There are two Eastsider articles on this. The first from 2010 states that they couldn't find out any information about the park; and the second from 2024 cites the first explaining that it is still a mystery area with "just about nothing on it". I found another potential source, which turned out to cite and concur with The Eastsider's documentation that there no recorded knowledge to be had. If there's no knowledge of the thing, other than it is an area whose name and history cannot be explained, we cannot have an encyclopaedia article. Uncle G (talk) 11:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• Redirect >>>List of parks in Los Angeles, where the municipal park is listed. Djflem (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

:

• Redirect >>>List of parks in Los Angeles, where the municipal park is listed. As per Djflem. Cxbrx (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
• :Could be more specific:List of parks in Los Angeles#Municipal parks of the city of Los Angeles Djflem (talk) 11:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.