Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CARE Pest

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per author's request at the article page, and talk page. JamieS93 23:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[CARE Pest]]=

:{{la|CARE Pest}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|CARE Pest}})

:Care Pest & Wildlife Control – note that primary editor moved the article to this location after the start of the AfD.

Company with no indication of notability WP:CORP from reliable sources outside of a local scope. Contested PROD. Trying to assume good faith, but this is possibly spam (due to the user name of the primary editor) and there is no evidence that the "notable employees" section is anything more than WP:COI. --Kinu t/c 23:05, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

:*Delete - Does not pass WP:CORP due to lack of significant coverage in the media, along with no reliable sources being provided to confirm notability. XenocideTalk|Contributions 23:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

  • :Delete - non-notable, and article reads like promotional material.119.224.57.190 (talk) 04:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom.  B.Rossow talkcontr 14:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. I live in Vancouver and am familiar with the nature of the citations provided; the first and third are certainly trivial (in that they would offer nothing in the way of informed analysis or comment) and the second, CBC, is likely trivial. I see this media attention as a coatrack for the company's use of dogs to sniff out bedbugs (currently rampant in Vancouver); admittedly this is an interesting use of detection dogs, but one that lends no notability to the company, IMHO. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 20:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 20:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. The individual bios are particularly non-notable. Hairhorn (talk) 21:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.