Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Boiler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Central Boiler]]=

:{{la|Central Boiler}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Central_Boiler Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Central Boiler}})

WP:MILL Just another business, doing their thing, getting a small write up in the trade magazines. But are they encyclopedically relevant? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP. Sourcing offered above is in passing and / ot WP:SPIP, insufficient for establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Per norm. Britishfinance (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.