Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakma martial arts

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Chakma martial arts}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Chakma martial arts}})

This (likely LLM-generated) article is based on entirely hallucinated or fabricated citations. They simply don't exist, none of them. No search results come back for these text strings. Examples: There is no book called Indigenous Peoples of Bangladesh by an R. Ahmed from Dhaka University Press. The International Journal of Cultural Studies [https://journals.sagepub.com/loi/icsa/group/d2010.y2010 published volume 13 in 2010, not volume 16], and no article by this title appears in its archives. Archive.org has never once recorded a site at [https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://www.chakmaheritage.org/ chakmaheritage.org]. I was hesitant to file an A11 or a G4 since I think some admins might be reluctant to delete something with purported sources, but anyone who looks closely will see this is plainly made up. The only source Google turns up for this topic is [https://www.srku.edu.in/read?s=Chakma+martial+arts a university webpage that does not cover the topic but only serves up advertising spam]. The subject obviously fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTHOAX. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Bangladesh. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:HOAX. The South Asian Martial Arts Review, really...? Madeleine (talk) 02:55, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above discussion. Please also do check Chakma history and Chakma Kingdom created by the same user, either needs to be rephrased/merged/deleted. Imwin567 (talk) 03:07, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
• :@Imwin567 At least some of the sources on Chakma history are real. Chakma Kingdom is LONG and I'm guessing has mostly fabricated sources, but I don't have time right now to BEFORE that topic. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:12, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above. {{ping|Dclemens1971}} I went ahead and created a deletion discussion for Chakma Kingdom – see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakma Kingdom. There was a merge discussion on the talk page where several users recommended deletion instead due to hoax/verifiability concerns, so your input at the AfD would be welcome. Zeibgeist (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as a WP:HOAX jolielover♥talk 18:34, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as per nominator. Lekkha Moun (talk) 07:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete I did some of my own research and found I have to agree with the comments already posted. WP:HOAX certainly seems to apply. Papaursa (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

:Delete, very likely hoax. The citations don't exist, and both the article and the references (along with the "quotes" from them) stink of AI. It seems like the article creator was hoping nobody would bother looking for these offline "sources". ApexParagon (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.