Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Plummer (Editor)

:{{la|Chris Plummer (Editor)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chris_Plummer_(Editor) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Chris Plummer (Editor)}})

Not notable, makes claim of significance. GregJackP Boomer! 22:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep It's relatively easy to verify claim that his film editing work has won significant national awards and I believe he meets both criteria 3 & 4 of WP:CREATIVE. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep Meets WP:ANYBIO through multiple awards and nominations,[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0687617/awards] and notable to New Zealand is perfectly fine for en.Wikipedia. The project will benefit through the stub article being improved through regular editing. The project does not benefit with deletion of a notable topic. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
• Keep Meets WP:CREATIVE. I found sources for a couple of awards and added them to the article, plus I fleshed out the article a bit using more sources via a Google search. AuthorAuthor (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
• Keep looks notable enough but needs work. NealeFamily (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.