Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church History Timeline

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Timeline of Christianity. postdlf (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Church History Timeline]]=

:{{la|Church History Timeline}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Church_History_Timeline Stats])

:({{Find sources|Church History Timeline}})

Appears to be a duplicate of History of Christianity. Redirect was reverted by page creator. Stickee (talk) 02:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

::...to Timeline of Christianity. Better option - good call Mark. St★lwart111 22:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Speedy redirect as per Stalwart111.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Switching to Redirect to Timeline of Christianity as per Mark Viking's comment (below).--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Timeline of Christianity. There is in principle nothing wrong with creating a timeline article for Christianity. But we already have a much better developed and better referenced timeline article in the form of Timeline of Christianity. The current article is redundant with it and should be redirected. Church History Timeline, or its title-cased alternative, seems like a plausible search term, so I do think a redirect is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 20:50, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.