Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cunico Resources

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Cunico Resources}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Cunico Resources}})

Non notable organization that doesn’t WP:NCORP. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search linked me to unreliable sources such as [https://www.bnamericas.com/en/company-profile/cunico-resources-nv-cunico-resources this], [https://www.linkedin.com/company/cunico-resources-n-v- this], & [https://www.mindat.org/mining_companies/Cunico+Resources/ this]. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Macedonia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

• {{ping|Celestina007}} I've updated the article in question so as to relieve your concerns, now with over 10 external sources it should satisfy the most uptight administrator. Magnovvig (talk) 15:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

• Beny Steinmetz is notable. Everything he does is notable. I grant you that source 2 is ridiculous and 3 is weak, 1 is an industry newsletter as far as I can tell. Whether these particular shell companies are notable enough for their own article is another question. If not a summary of this should be merged into the article for the parent company.Elinruby (talk) 07:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

• Keep, passes WP:GNG as some good old references are seen [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-12/steinmetz-pressed-on-guinea-deals-on-second-day-of-bribery-trial], [https://www.reuters.com/article/ferronikeli-ma-balfin/albanias-balfin-to-buy-kosovos-indebted-nickel-producer-idINL5N1UK27P], [https://www.miningweekly.com/article/bsg-resources-continues-fight-for-simandou-and-zogota-2015-03-06] etc. Chirota (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Riteboke (talk) 08:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Additional cites provided above do not establish notability (first one doesn't even mention the company) and at most give incidental mention of it, not a focus on it. Therefore fails WP:NCORP. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
• Delete and/or merge with Beny Steinmetz. Sources cited in the article (and brought up by Chirota) are either unreliable or are not providing significant coverage of this particular company. However, a few sentences about Cunico could possibly be added to Beny Steinmetz. JBchrch (talk) 14:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Unlike Chirota I'm of an opinion that the subject would have to meet the criteria of NCORP (which it clearly doesn't), not merely GNG. — Alalch Emis (talk) 18:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.