Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curiyo

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Curiyo}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Curiyo Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Curiyo}})

Company that closed; no evidence of notability now or when it was stillan active company DGG ( talk ) 20:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Curiyo did not last long enough to make a notable enough mark.TH1980 (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 23:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software -related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 23:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. The article's multiple references demonstrate notability. The fact that the business has closed down does not detract from that notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. I could only find one semi-decent RS on the company from Forbes (which I have added to the article). However, it is only one of three companies profiled by Forbes and the profiles themselves are not detailed. Every other RS was either not specifically about the company/passing reference, or not a strong RS. No point in building a weak case for WP:GNG for this one, as if it doesn't get AfD'ed now, it will eventually. Ultimately, its technology never worked and it shut-down soon after getting its main funding. Britishfinance (talk) 15:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.