Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cydoor

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 00:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Cydoor]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Cydoor}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Cydoor}})

Fails WP:GNG BryceM2001 (talk) 20:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment: {{ping|BryceM2001}} could you explain what you mean when you say the subject fails WP:GNG? The following sources seem to me like they might establish notability: [https://www.broadcom.com/support/security-center/attacksignatures/detail?asid=20802] [https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/threat/Adware.Win32.Cydoor/] [https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/threat-encyclopedia/malware/adware.win32.cydoor.aa] --Richard Yin (talk) 12:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting due to lack of participation. User:BryceM2001, as the nominator, please respond to the question asked of you here. You didn't provide much of a deletion rationale for this article or show that a BEFORE had been done.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

  • delete Lacks significant coverage: routine detection announcements only. --Altenmann >talk 00:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not seeing coverage of the adware more detailed than brief paragraphs, e.g. [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Computer_System_Security_Basic_Concepts/UwrOhcgVhsMC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=cydoor&pg=PA26&printsec=frontcover], [https://books.google.com/books?id=8DcEAAAAMBAJ&pg=RA1-PA41&dq=cydoor&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjd9_aB6NOKAxX-aDABHdmMMhsQ6AF6BAgHEAI#v=onepage&q=cydoor&f=false]. There are a few brief articles of the company itself in trade publications such as Adweek, also not enough for notability. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 08:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. Whizkin (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.