Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darla Crane

:{{la|Darla Crane}} ([{{fullurl:Darla Crane|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darla Crane}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable. Fails WP:PORNBIO, fails general notability guidelines. No indication of any reliable third-party coverage, virtually all references used in current and past versions of article link to sites controlled by the article subject or to retailer sites. User self-identifying as Darla Crane edits extensively to keep article in line with her online autobiography, making this a borderline copyvio at best, and raising substantial COI and RS issues. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete Too much COI, not notable vanity page. Parkerparked (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• And yet, there is [http://books.google.com/books?&as_brr=0&q=%22Darla+Crane%22 a source]. One source isn't enough for the WP:GNG, but it does pass WP:RS and WP:V because there's evidence that she exists and she really is a bondage model with published pictures.

  That would suggest that we should WP:PRESERVE the content somewhere on Wikipedia, and indeed we do: Darla Crane is listed at List of bondage models#1990s.

  Unless a further source is found to satisfy the WP:GNG I would suggest that the above source is added to List of bondage models#1990s to support Darla Crane's inclusion, and that the Darla Crane page is redirected there.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 19:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.