Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Parker controversy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Canley (talk) 10:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[David Parker controversy]]=

:{{la|David Parker controversy}} ([{{fullurl:David Parker controversy|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Parker controversy}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This is just the report of some very minor incidents. Their importance is not explained, nor even why they are a "controversy." Northwestgnome (talk) 08:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete Parents have issues with school districts and teachers all the time, and this is no different. Very few sources and few changes ensued in the interim of this. Nate • (chatter) 09:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete Doesn't seem notable enough for a page. Alberon (talk) 10:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Powers ^T 14:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete - interesting story, but of purely local interest and thus outside our remit. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Weak delete. It has some citations, which is good, but WP:NOTNEWS would suggest deletion without evidence of some wider or longer-term impact. Bondegezou (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.