Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepen Shah (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Omnicom Group. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Deepen Shah]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepen Shah}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Deepen Shah}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Deepen Shah}})

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Plenty of mentions and quotes but everything on the page and what I find in a WP:BEFORE is about the company, not him. CNMall41 (talk) 07:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

:Hello CNMall41, please be requested to exclude Mr. Deepen Shah article for deletion as the details of it are all facts. We will be at your disposal on how or what we can do to make it better and not have it deleted. Thank you.

:ToxELB1025

:PA for Mr. Shah ToxELB1025 (talk) 04:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

::Mr. Shaw's personal assistant? Oaktree b (talk) 14:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

:::Oh dear…. Mccapra (talk) 19:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

:::Hello Oaktree, Yes. I'm his PA/VA and we are requesting for his article to not be deleted. We will do our best to improve it and provide more supporting details, references and links to it.

:::Thanks,

:::Errol ToxELB1025 (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  • Redirect to a newly created Buzzd article; the coverage given is exclusively about that Blackberry app. Coverage in the New York Times is basically an interview with this person and another individual... Otherwise, !delete as not notable due to lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

::A redirect would be a good WP:ATD. I think Buzzd is now called "LocalResponse" but not sure if it would meet WP:NCORP. Maybe to Omnicom Group where we could mention that company's purchase of eztxtmsg? --CNMall41 (talk) 18:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  • Draftify There seems to be a thin claim of notability that could be addressed by expansion, though the WP:COI issues are a concern. I would support a redirect, if an appropriate target existed. Alansohn (talk) 16:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting. It's not at all clear what article those advocating Redirect want to point this article to. Please identify an existing article. Just one, please.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

::Redirect to the Omicron Group seems ok, with a discussion of the purchase. Oaktree b (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.