Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Comin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Diego Comin]]=

:{{la|Diego Comin}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Diego_Comin Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Diego Comin}})

Doesn't appear to meet any of the notability criteria for academics, or for people more broadly, or the general notability guideline. There is some coverage in secondary sources, but the vast majority of instances are passing mentions rather than substantial discussions of his research. (This is one of several articles about Dartmouth economists created recently by an editor who appears to have a connection to the department; this is, however, the only one which strikes me as almost certainly non-notable.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep. Passes WP:Prof#C1 with a GS h-index of 26. For the statistically challenged, would 3700 citations by the work of others be more understandable? Xxanthippe (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC).

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep as per {{u|Xxanthippe}}'s analysis of the scholarly impact in this field. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.