Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamworks-uary

=[[Dreamworks-uary]]=

:{{la|Dreamworks-uary}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dreamworks-uary Stats])

:({{Find sources|Dreamworks-uary}})

A promotional article for "That Guy With The Glasses" and his reviews -- and I don't see the encyclopedic value in a list of summaries of one person's movie reviews. ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

  • delete unencyclopedic and promotional. Mangoe (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • delete No evidence (or likelihood) of outside coverage of this series. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Previous a speedy A7 after the article was submitted by User:Ashlark two days ago. Now it is back, equally unreferenced, equally non-notable. No reason to revise previous opinion that it fails :WP:NWEB. AllyD (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment See the article creator's comments on Talk:Dreamworks-uary. These draw attention to another article as precedent: :Disneycember. That is equally lacking in references to establish notability. AllyD (talk) 18:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Yeah, that's not good either. Shall we add that in to this AFD? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge with List of The Nostalgia Critic episodes It does contain things reviewed by Doug Walker of The Nostalgia Critic fame, and his other videos are lumped in with his.MadManAmeica (talk) 11:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge with Disney-cember: It's important to NC fans. Maybe rename the page to something along the lines of "NC Animated Reviews".- JustPhil 03:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.