Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eswatini–Spain relations

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Eswatini–Spain relations}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Eswatini–Spain relations}})

Fails WP:GNG. Lack of significant third party coverage. This article is based on the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Actual relations are very little: no embassies, agreements, state visits, and trade is miniscule. LibStar (talk) 23:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

• Keep-This article should be kept in my opinion because this article is related to the foreign affairs of a country and can be improved by adding important references, contants in this article.Best Regards.---✨LazyManiik✨ 02:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC) {{small|Sockpuppet of blocked user {{np|Lazy Maniik}}. ✗plicit 14:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)}}

:* You have failed to say how this article meets notability guidelines. LibStar (talk) 02:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

:*And can you explain your contradictory contribution here? St★lwart¹¹¹ 10:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - clear original research. The only place where this relationship exists at all is here on Wikipedia. Exists + exists ≠ "bilateral relations". St★lwart¹¹¹ 10:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Waddles 🗩 🖉 15:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete, Per nominator. Alex-h (talk) 12:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.