Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experience Project
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 00:49, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Experience Project]]=
:{{la|1=Experience Project}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Experience Project}})
Defunct website that doesn't seem to have sufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability as noted in talk page. I do notice there are some now removed (negative) reviews on the website but these seem to be a very surface level and the coverage is rather short. Therefore I am nominating this for discussion. Imcdc Contact 06:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Software, and California. Imcdc Contact 06:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
:Delete - Fails WP:GNG. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
:
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: I found this [https://www.phillymag.com/news/2013/05/08/social-network-experience-project-terrible/] but I can't find any other coverage. It doesn't meet WP:GNG. 🌊PacificDepthstalk|contrib 00:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.