Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FabriQate

:{{la|FabriQate}} ([{{fullurl:FabriQate|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FabriQate}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{find sources|FabriQate}})

Non-notable company. Fails WP:CORP. Notability is asserted, but I have been unable to verify the statements in the article using a [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22FabriQate%22 Google News Archive search]. Cunard (talk) 17:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk)  · @782  ·  17:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- —Cybercobra (talk) 19:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• One hit in GNews. If evidence can be presented that it is indeed one of the top development countries, by all means keep. If not (as is the case at the moment), delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Neville-Smith (talk • contribs) 17:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.