Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith in Place (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 03:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Faith in Place]]=
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith in Place}}
:{{la|1=Faith in Place}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Faith in Place}})
Fails WP:NORG, lack of reliable sources. Press release-like writing doesn't help. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: I've boldly reverted the article to before [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faith_in_Place&diff=686558848 this edit], which added all of of the fluff and nuked the refs.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Religion, Environment, and Illinois. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as the rv'ed version of the article seems to pass WP:NORG. --interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
::Does it though? I don't see it. Between the dead links and its own website, there's not a lot of coverage.-KH-1 (talk) 05:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
::: Of the nine citations, two are the organisation's own website, and four are dead links. That leaves a book and two Chicago Tribune articles which incidentally mention it, which I wouldn't really say is significant coverage. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.