Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filthy Lucre (band)

:{{la|Filthy Lucre (band)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Filthy_Lucre_(band) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Filthy Lucre (band)}})

PROD removed without explanation. No sign of notability. Sole link on page goes to a non-existent page StuartDouglas (talk) 14:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 17. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 14:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Subject fails GNG and BAND. No sources are currently cited. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
• Comment. Two apparently independently notable members means that we shouldn't just delete this as it is a plausible search term that should redirect somewhere with details on the band. Given the strong connection to L.A. Guns, perhaps that would be a suitable target to merge and redirect. If verifiability is concern, there are several book sources that discuss the band: [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_NNmFiUnSmUC&pg=PA726&dq=%22filthy+lucre%22+%22phil+lewis%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dAPIU4jSL8jQ7Aazn4GoDw&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22filthy%20lucre%22%20%22phil%20lewis%22&f=false], [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wdAzAQAAIAAJ&q=%22filthy+lucre%22+%22phil+lewis%22&dq=%22filthy+lucre%22+%22phil+lewis%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dAPIU4jSL8jQ7Aazn4GoDw&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAg], [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ewdCAQAAIAAJ&q=%22filthy+lucre%22+%22phil+lewis%22&dq=%22filthy+lucre%22+%22phil+lewis%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dAPIU4jSL8jQ7Aazn4GoDw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAw]. --Michig (talk) 17:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

• Comment A redirect to LA Guns might be an idea, I'd say, but the links simply mention that the band was formed, which isn't really 'discussion' and doesn't establish any notability. StuartDouglas (talk) 15:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 10:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

---

• Strong Delete -Fails WP:GNG, WP:Notability and WP:NBAND, so why are we debating this article? LOLCanyouhearmenow 14:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

:*Note The preceding comment was posted by Canyouhearmenow who probably just forgot to sign. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

::Unfortunately sometimes my keyboard sticks and I think it worked when it didnt. Thank you!Canyouhearmenow 14:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.