Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Rasolofonirina

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Francis Rasolofonirina]]=

:{{la|1=Francis Rasolofonirina}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Francis Rasolofonirina}})

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep [https://midi-madagasikara.mg/football-francis-rasolofonirina-la-fierte-des-mauriciens/], [https://sport.defimedia.info/node/14121], [https://sport.defimedia.info/node/15275] look like decent coverage to. I'd say that amounts to WP:SIGCOV. I've expanded the article based on these sources. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep per Robby.is.on doing a Heymann standard job with the article. Geschichte (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep per sources above which show notability. Giant Snowman 18:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep in view of the sources cited and improvements made by Robby.is.on. Prof.PMarini (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep – Per above. Svartner (talk) 00:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Weak keep I would like to see slightly better sourcing, but okay, the article seems like it needs work, but that doesn't negate notability. Govvy (talk) 09:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.