Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraysexuality

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Fraysexuality}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Fraysexuality}})

This article is a stub that can be easily incorporated and merged into one of the existing articles on asexuality, including gray asexuality, asexuality, or demisexuality. There are little to no reliable sources in this article, and I don't see how "fraysexuality" at all warrants its own article. DocZach (talk) 03:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. DocZach (talk) 03:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
• Merge with Gray asexuality. The article itself defines the subject as {{tq|a subsector of grey asexuality}}, and the article on gray asexuality does already have subsections dedicated to other such 'subsectors'. Thus it is indeed questionable why this subsector in particular would warrant its own article. Brat Forelli🦊 22:32, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
• Leaning "Merge" with concerns. Neologism that has attracted some mainstream sourcing. As an exception to WP:NOTNEO "Merge" would be to "use the term within other articles". I have reservations. Lacking sources that the subject is a subsector (microlabel) of "grey asexuality", why this choice over asexuality? ''See comments below. Otr500 (talk)
• This [https://clubsexu.com/en/coming-out-as-asexual-and-carrying-the-burden-of-educating-others/ source] (not sure of reliability) states, "Asexuality is a spectrum that includes several sexual orientations such as demisexuality, fraysexuality, greysexuality, and reciprosexuality". The lead of the article includes "...is a subsector of grey asexuality", but is unsourced and not in the body of the article. The infobox does have "Asexuality" as the Parent category, sourced from WebMD. Otr500 (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
• :The subsector sentence is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fraysexuality&oldid=1251421562 originally] sourced[https://www.womenshealthmag.com/relationships/a42025464/what-is-fraysexuality/][https://www.gaytimes.com/life/fraysexual-meaning/][https://taimi.com/wiki/fraysexual-ignotasexual-what-is-it-what-does-it-mean/] and it was uncontroversial in last decade to state that everything outside allosexuality that is not totally asexual is a form of graysexuality. Now the phrase asexual spectrum is more popular and it seems Wikipedia uses it as the same as asexuality for some reason. Anyways, those are things for anyone who is going to merge this to notice/look at before merging. Vivb1 (talk) 04:18, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
• Merge with Gray asexuality: Mainly in agreement with Brat Forelli above. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.