Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Friedland
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 14:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Gerald Friedland]]=
:{{la|1=Gerald Friedland}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gerald Friedland}})
No indication of importance Fredyd (talk) 13:58, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I definitely agree that there is no indication of importance on this article. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Computing, and Germany. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete since subject fails the notability criterion despite the efforts of two kamikaze accounts who have rolled an avalanche of citations on us.
:Forensics: We have lame irrelevancies such as [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/uc-berkeley-affiliated-icsi-launches-140000977.html this] about two companies of one of which our man is a director; papers co-written by our subject, e.g. [https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11293 this one]; a bunch of group interviews, like [https://www.zdnet.com/article/brainome-launches-product-to-optimize-machine-learning-development-process/ this]; fodder for the References section, like [http://mmcommons.org/ this link], [https://webscope.sandbox.yahoo.com/catalog.php?datatype=i&did=67 this], [https://imagej.net/plugins/siox this], and more; important-looking sources such as The New York Times from whom we only get, unfortunately, yet another [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/12/technology/personaltech/12basics.html irrelevancy] about "photos that reveal secrets"; plain and routine press releases, such as [http://www.sigmm.org/news/new-sigmm-leadership this] which, strangely, informs us that our subject has been replaced in some "leadership"; and a grave of dead links such as [http://www.paintshopprotutorials.co.uk/html/foreground_select_tool_gimp.html this]. No matter how many zeros we add up, the result does not change. -The Gnome (talk) 01:09, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.