Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghislain Cordeel

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Ghislain Cordeel}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Ghislain Cordeel}})

Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Merge into his brother Amaury's page at least, but Ghislain's career is completely irrelevant to Amaury's, so maybe fully delete Ghislain's page. - 2A01:36D:1200:4672:44C3:46D:541B:FBBF (talk) 12:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Belgium. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• Comment: The nomination is totally flawed, seeing as the article makes no attempt to ride on the coattails of Amaury Cordeel. In fact, Amaury Cordeel is not mentioned at all. Can you please try again to explain why this should be deleted, and this time relate Ghislain Cordeel to the relevant guidelines, WP:NMOTORSPORTS and WP:GNG? Geschichte (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• The subject is the brother of Amaury Cordeel - notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. - 2A01:36D:1200:4672:DDA5:4C08:B8B6:3AA7 (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• :WP:NOTINHERITED is not a guideline. glman (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• Delete Funny enough it even comes from the page Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. The person in question does not appear to have any significant coverage. Is anyone seeing any sources showing significant coverage? KeepItGoingForward (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• Keep - nominator has not provided any guideline or reasoning for deletion. glman (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
• :While I agree the nominator should provide a more clear explanation, it does not appear Ghislain Cordeel meets notability requirements. Are you seeing otherwise? KeepItGoingForward (talk) 02:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
• My only issue was that nobody has claimed that the subject is notable because of his brother - his brother was not even mentioned in the article. My agenda was to improve nomination statements in general. Geschichte (talk) 11:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete - Okay driver at best, that did well in some national series. Some feeder series, no so, nothing top level. No prejudice for a recreation in the future though if he has more significance in the future but I guess he'll be another run of the mill driver. SpacedFarmer (talk) 16:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.