Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden enema (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Golden enema}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Golden_enema_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Golden enema}})

The re-directed article does not mention this and this redirect replaced a sentence about a subject found only in pornographic sources.Helen4780 (talk) 21:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• Comment: wrong location (should be at WP:RFD as it's a redirect), however you could add a sentence to the target article using non-pornographic sources ([https://books.google.com.au/books?id=ZXM5AAAAMAAJ&q=%22golden+enema%22],[https://books.google.com.au/books?id=sTWXAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT61&q=%22golden+enema%22&hl=en#v=snippet&q=%22golden%20enema%22&f=false],[https://books.google.com.au/books?id=xBUEAQAAIAAJ&q=%22golden+enema%22],...) if you were so inclined. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! I've returned the article to being a re-redirect, albeit now to a section of the original and I removed the template. Also, I put what you wrote as a comment above the re-direct. I'll put doing something better on my to-do list. Helen4780 (talk) 22:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

• Comment Discussion page was created without the {{tl|afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. The discussion appears to have been somewhat resolved, but the tag and this page remain, so I'll fix the parts that need fixing and let others judge whether further discussion is necessary. --Finngall ^talk 14:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.