Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HaptX
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 14:02, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
=[[:HaptX]]=
:{{la|1=HaptX}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=HaptX}})
Company not shown to meet notability requirements. Nearly all sources are WP:CORPTRIV about startup funding rounds in places like WP:CNET. The {{sfnlink|Perret|Vander Poorten|2018|article=Draft:HaptX}} article comes the closest to establishing notability; however, it's about the product and does not cover the company in any depth. Originally {{diff|HaptX|prev|1287350449|declined as an AfC draft}} for failing to meet WP:NCORP, but editor {{diff|HaptX|1290038739|1287350449|added two more sources since then}} ({{sfnlink|Soper|2021|article=HaptX}}, a funding round notice in GeekWire, and {{sfnlink|Kelly|2022|article=HaptX}}, which covers the company's new product and is in reliable source VentureBeat, but relies too heavily on company press releases and doesn't pass WP:SIRS) and moved to mainspace. Original author has since been blocked for disruptive editing, but this article is not CSD-G5 eligible. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 12:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Technology. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 12:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not seeing significant coverage of the company (or the product, frankly) in independent, reliable, secondary sources. Woodroar (talk) 15:17, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Lots of mentions and announcements but nothing that satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:27, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete.Fails WP:NCORP. Article created by new user who's now blocked for disruptive editing. Article did not pass WP:AFC yet creator still tried to bypass the process by moving the page.- Imcdc Contact 00:49, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Based on my own research, this qualifies as WP:CORPTRIV and fails both WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. It’s also worth pointing out that the article failed the WP:AfC process. Overall, no merit to keeping the article. ZachH007 (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.