Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Skidmore

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Hugh Skidmore]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Hugh Skidmore}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Hugh Skidmore}})

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. A search in google news and British newspaper archives did not yield any decent third party sources. LibStar (talk) 23:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 23:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. He is mentioned briefly in [https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/rockhampton/sport/rocky-youngster-goes-from-keen-spectator-to-competitor/news-story/3d63261a5050339e90e33961bb8f2948 Courier Mail here] and [https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/speedway/hugh-skidmore-set-receive-derby-3664697 this source] may be alright but that's about all I could find, don't believe he meets WP:SPORTSCRIT as the nom says. StewdioMACK (talk) 19:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG (talk) 18:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. Looked at Courier Mail and Gazette Live, and agree that even with their inclusion coverage does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT. I note that participating in a relatively obscure form of motorsport makes it harder to meet the criteria for motorsport signifance, putting the emphasis on meeting general WP:GNG requirements, which I am not satisfied is achieved. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per above, I was also unable to find anything covering the subject that would qualify as significant coverage. Garsh (talk) 01:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete no significant coverages. Xegma(talk) 04:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.